Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Pioneer Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 886 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 13, 1942

    Respondent recognizes that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has adopted the latter view and has been followed in this respect by the Board. Seaside Improvement Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Commissioner v. … Notwithstanding the decision to the *893 contrary by the Third Circuit in Commissioner v. Kieselbach, 127 Fed. (2d) 359, we adhered to our former position in David S. Brown, 47 B. T. A. 139, and we continue to do so.

    Modified on other grounds by Estate of Worcester v. Commissioner, 1 T.C.M. 527 (1943)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • REID v. COMMISSIONER

    28 B.T.A. 1217 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 22, 1933

    the other architects to whom the board also assigned specific Avork, and constitute him an officer or employee of a state agency. *1222 The case is so similar to Underwood v. … Brown, 22 B.T.A. 581 ; Charles J. Tobin, 17 B.T.A. 1261 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burke v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 337 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 24, 1931

    While it is the rule that descent and distribution are governed by State law (De Vaughn v. Hutchinson, 165 U. S. 566 ; Randolph v. … The respondent’s claim, made by amended answer, that he erred in accepting separate returns for the period January 1 to December 4, 1925, is denied on authority of Poe v. Seaborn, 282 U. S. 101 . Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • O'Laughlin v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 1327 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 31, 1934

    Carnick, 21 B.T.A. 12 , 24; Altschul Tobacco Co. v. Commissioner (C.C.A., 5th Cir.), 42 Fed. (2d) 609, 610; Reinecke v. … Brown, 18 B.T.A. 859, 867 ; Uncasville Mfg. Co., 19 B.T.A. 920 , 927; Atlantic Casket Co. v. Rose (C.C.A., 5th Cir.), 22 Fed. (2d) 800; Anderson v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Asmussen v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 878 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 16, 1937

    We may also consider the time intervening between the issuance of the stock dividend and its redemption, Hyman v. Helvering, 71 Fed. (2d) 342; Robinson v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pratt, Read & Co. v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 1348 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1931

    The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held, in Commissioner v. Adolph Hirsch & Co., 30 Fed. (2d) 645, that “ the control of the stock owned by the same interest refers to beneficial interest.” … The following decisions of the Board are controlling upon this issue: Good Manufacturing Co., 15 B. T. A. 583; Oriental Real Estate Co., 17 B. T. A. 1220; Browne, McQuaid, Probst, Inc., 17 B. T. A. 1218; John B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Comar Oil Co. v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 688 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 10, 1931

    This Board has decided adversely to the petitioner’s contention, in several proceedings wherein the factual conditions were substantially the same as those now under consideration. Cf. Mrs. J. C. … A. 574; affd., 40 Fed. (2d) 892; Lena Brown et al., 24 B. T. A. 30; S. L. Herold, 17 B. T. A. 933; affd., 42 Fed. (2d) 932.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mathews v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 1133 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 18, 1928

    Co. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735; Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 227 , 29 S. Ct. 252 , 53 L. Ed. 480 . And see Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. … Byers v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1191; Appeal of P. Frank Durkin, 4 B. T. A. 743; and Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Wilson, 138 U. S. 501 . Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clary v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 1142 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 5, 1940

    Samuel V. Woods, 5 B. T. A. 413; J. T. Browning, 16 B. T. A. 485; John Shirley Ward et al., Executors, 22 B. T. A. 352; affd., 58 Fed. (2d) 757; certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 656 ; rehearing denied, Dec. 5, 1932; W. L. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will ~be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lindsay v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 840 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 30, 1936

    New Colonial Ice Co. v. Commissioner, 292 U. S. 435 . Nor is there any basis in the record for approximating such item. See Cohan v. Commissioner , 39 Fed. (2d) 540. The cases of Walter F. Brown, 13 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will T)e entered for the respondent. Smith dissents.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Hartford-Empire Co. v. Commissioner

    26 B.T.A. 134 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 20, 1932

    A. 1307; Berenice Brown, 25 B. T. A. 814. … Marr v. United Stales, 268 U. S. 536 ; Maytag Co., 17 B. T. A. 182; Plumber's Supply Co., 20 B. T. A. 459; Standard Silica Co., 22 B. T. A. 97; Athol Manufacturing Co., 22 B. T.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hutchinson Co. v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 367 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 19, 1928

    Brown & Co., 9 B. T. A. 753; Keystone Coal & Mining Co., 10 B. T. A. 295; Palmetto Coal Co., 11 B. T. A. 154; Whitehouse Leather Products Co., 12 B. T. A. 714; Louisville Veneer Mills, 12 B. T. A. 1352; C. A. … See United States v. Updike, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Louisville Veneer Mills v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 1352 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 16, 1928

    The Board has already considered this question in a number of cases and decided the same adversely to the contention of the respondent. Fred T. Ley & Co., 9 B. T. A. 749; M. Brown & Co., 9 B. T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fawsett v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 908 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1934

    Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 . There have been several cases somewhat close to this on the facts. In Philip C. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 735 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1934

    In making thi,s contention they rely upon United States v. Mellon, 281 Fed. 645 ; United States v. Davison, 9 Fed. (2d) 1022; Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 ; and Jackson v. Commissioner, 51 Fed. (2d) 650. … Brown, 26 B.T.A. 901 ; cf. W. Q. Wright, 10 B.T.A. 806 . Indeed a dividend declared in cash has been held to be in substance a tax-free stock dividend. United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pioneer Auto. Service Co. v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 24, 1937

    A. 13; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , affirming 63 Fed. (2d) 66, affirming 22 B. T. A. 678. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Second Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 750 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 19, 1935

    Burnet v. Houston, 283 U. S. 223 ; Wickwire v. Rein ecke, 275 U. S. 101 ; Stiles v. Commissioner, 69 Fed. (2d) 951; Williams v. Commissioner, 44 Fed. (2d) 467; Green's Advertising Agency v. … Blair, 31 Fed. (2d) 96; Bishoff v. Commissioner, 27 Fed. (2d) 91; Brown v. Commissioner, 22 Fed. (2d) 797; Avery v. Commissioner, 22 Fed. (2d) 6.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Empire State Finance Corp. v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 1322 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 12, 1927

    Jones, Burt Brown Barker, and W. H. Tucker, as voting trustees. … The Board of Directors shall consist of seven members.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 386 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 14, 1928

    BROWN, AND RUFUS C. BURTON, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Townsend v. Commissioner Docket No. 19960. … Matthiessen, Jr., v. United States, 65 Ct.Cls. 484 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Little Rock Tent & Awning Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 1205 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 17, 1931

    The rule was stated by the Board in Primrose Tapestry Co., 20 B. T. … A. 286; Clark Brown Crain Co., 18 B. T. A. 937. In the instant case there is no evidence that there was anything abnormal or unusual in the use of borrowed capital to the amount indicated in our findings of fact.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.