Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Louis W. Gunby, Inc. v. Commissioner
41 B.T.A. 884 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 18, 1940
Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co., 287 U. S. 415 ; Higgins v. Smith, 308 U. S. 473 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will loe entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTaylor Secur., Inc. v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 696 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 17, 1939
Carmen V. Green, 11 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered wider Bule 50. Aettndell, Smith, and Black dissent.
Cited 19 timesPublishedPittsburgh & Lake Erie R.R. v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 259 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 1, 1933
Co. case, particularly in view of the possible effect of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422 ; Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. … Co. v. Commissioner, 284 U.S. 552 . * * * See also Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Commissioner , 52 Fed. (2d) 372, 377.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWestern Acceptance Corp. v. Commissioner
46 B.T.A. 828 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 1, 1942
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co., supra; Coast Finance Corporation v. Powers, 209 Pac. 614 (Oreg.); Martin v. McAvoy, 228 Pac. 694 (Wash.). … Co. v. Commissioner, 284 U. S. 552 ; Deputy v. duPont, 308 U. S. 488 .
Cited 0 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 93 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 16, 1932
Something of their methods of operation during the eleven years is shown by one of the petitioners in his testimony before the Board. … Willis v. Commissioner, 58 Fed. (2d) 121; Little Four Oil & Cas Co. v. Lewellyn, 35 Fed. (2d) 149. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLomita Gasoline Co. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 385 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1935
The case was remanded to this Board and on reconsideration this Board held ( 30 B.T.A. 568 ) that there was no evidence before it to prove that the royalties paid by the Signal Gasoline Corporation were less than the fair … See Signal Gasoline Corporation v. Commissioner, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 731 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 10, 1930
A. v. Davis, 264 U. S. 47 ; Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531 ; May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238 . … Saltonstall v. Saltonstall, 276 U. S. 260 ; Chase National Bank v. United States, 278 U. S. 327 ; Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co., 278 U. S. 339 .
Cited 6 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 515 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1929
S. 107 ; Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co., 242 U. S. 503 .] … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. Steknhagen and Muedock concur in the result.
Cited 8 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 926 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 25, 1934
of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Atkins v. … On December 11, 1933, the Supreme Court of the United States rendered its opinion in Helvering v.
Cited 1 timesPublished21 B.T.A. 1248 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 19, 1931
A. 1269; Phillips v. Commissioner, 42 Fed. (2d) 177; Routzahn v. Tyroler, 36 Fed. (2d) 208. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the petitioner.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlendinning, McLeish & Co. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 518 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 28, 1931
Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, 278 U. S. 282 ; Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U. S. 101 ; Avery v. Commissioner, 22 Fed. (2d) 6. … Iieviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChemung Canal Trust Co. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 230 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1934
Bank, 1 B.T.A. 460 , is directly in point and controls the issue presented unless the Board has recanted since the National Bank of South Carolina v. Lucas, 36 Fed. (2d) 1013. … The Board has consistently adhered to the principle enunciated in Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank, supra, and as recently as Escanaba & Lake Superior R.R.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 976 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1929
Hatch v. United States, 34 Fed. (2d) 426. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent. Green and ARUndell dissent on the second point.
Cited 15 timesPublished1 B.T.A. 1048 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 27, 1925
The taxpayer has a right, under section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1924, to appeal to this Board from the assessment of the deficiency. … Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorgia Stevedoring Co. v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 611 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 29, 1939
The deficiency notice was mailed June 30, 1938, and petition was filed with the Board on September 28, 1938. … Dixie Manufacturing Co. v. Ricks, 153 Ga. 364 ; 112 S. E. 370 ; Huey v. National Bank of Fitzgerald, 177 Ga. 64 ; 169 S. E. 491 ; Manufacturing Lumbermen's Underwriters v. South Georgia Railway Co., 196 S. E. 244 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
15 B.T.A. 475 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 19, 1929
To the same effect was- the decision of the Board in Edwin J. Schoettle Co., 13 B. T. A. 950. *479 In the proceeding at bar the functions of the treasurer were being exercised by the persons who signed the return. … Russell v. United States, 279 U. S. 836 . Reviewed by the Board. . Judgment of no deficiency will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 0 timesPublished15 B.T.A. 839 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 13, 1929
This view is in accord with the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in United States v. … This portion of the opinion of the District Court was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Rodenbough, v. United States, 25 Fed. (2d) 13.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 771 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 29, 1927
The Board has found the value of the land to be $7.50. … The Board at this time will not attempt to pass on the situation as to the rights of the widow in the State of Nebraska.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppeal of Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.
1 B.T.A. 1150 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 20, 1925
The Board decided, however, in the Appeal of Winthrop Ames, 1 B. T. … S. 98 , and McCaughn v. Luding ton, 268 U. S. 106 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrea Canon Oil Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 1134 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 20, 1934
The Commissioner denied such claims and the question finally came to the Board. … Upon appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, that tribunal, in Signal Gasoline Corp. v. Commissioner, 66 Fed. (2d) 886, reversed this Board upon the authority of Palmer v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna