Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Richardson v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 875 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 27, 1927

    Petitioner’s claim for the loss on account of the obsolescence of good will is disallowed under the decision of the court in Red Wing Malting Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 1358 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 8, 1929

    This was the position taken by the Board in Transatlantic Clock & Watch Co., *1367 supra, and also by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered wnder Rule 50.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Amigo Coal Co. v. Commissioner

    8 B.T.A. 598 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1927

    V. Greene Co., 5 B. T. A. 442; Hirst & Begley Linseed Co., 4 B. T. A. 1160. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richards & Hirschfeld, Inc. v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 1295 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 24, 1931

    United States v. Anderson et al., 269 U. S. 422 . In Reid Ice Cream Corporation, 24 B. T. … The tax liability of the Contractors Company is subject to adjustment under the opinion of the Board in the correlated proceeding in Docket No. 21715. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered imder Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Edwards Drilling Co. v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 341 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1937

    Workman v. Commissioner, supra, and McPherson v. Commissioner, supra. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Bule 50. SEC. 24. ITEMS NOT DEDÜCTIBLE.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Stern v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 444 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 27, 1928

    See Fitchie v. Brown, 211 U. S. 321 . This duty is one imposed upon the trustee and is to be discharged by him in the exercise of powers conferred by the will. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent. Phillips concurs in the result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.

    6 B.T.A. 1045 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 26, 1927

    Whatever merit this argument may have had prior to the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1926, it is clear that under the provisions of section 283(f) of that act the Board now has jurisdiction of the appeal. … Facts substantially similar to those which obtain in the case at bar were before the court in Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. S. 346.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • De Paoli v. Commissioner

    8 B.T.A. 294 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 24, 1927

    United States v. Mitchell, 271 U. S. 9 ; 5 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 6008; Henry Reubel, 1 B. T. A. 676; Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 2 B. T. A. 892. … As to 1922, no deficiency has been determined by the respondent, and the Board is without jurisdiction of that year. Cornelius Cotton Mills, 4 B. T. A. 255.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cahn v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 783 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 27, 1935

    United *787 States v. White Dental Mfg. Co., 274 U. S. 398 ; Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co., 275 U. S. 243 ; Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U. S. 333 ; Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for Che Respondent. Seawell dissents.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 1354 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 11, 1929

    Hill v. Grissom, 299 Fed. 641 ; Isabella N. Skinker et al., 13 B. T. A. 846. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the respondent. Phillips, GeeeN, and ÁRUNDell dissent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Medalie v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 1284 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 26, 1934

    Since the hearing in the instant case the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reversed the Board’s decision in the Murphy case, and pro tanto the Rand decision as well. In the opinion in Commissioner v. … Lucas v. Reed, 281 U.S. 699 , 50 S.Ct. 352 , 74 L. Ed. 1125 ; Lucas v. Howard, 280 U.S. 526 , 50 S.Ct. 87 , 74 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Balzereit v. Commissioner

    46 B.T.A. 959 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 14, 1942

    Freuler v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 35 . We conclude that the decrees of the Orphans’ Court upon which petitioners rely have become final and are binding upon this Board. Freuler v. Helvering, 291 U. … Compare Freuler v. Helvering, 291 US. 35, 54 S. Ct. 308 , 78 L Ed. 634; Hubbell v. Helvering , (C. C. A.) 70 F (2d) 668. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered, for the petitioners. TURNER dissents. SEC. 162.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Neustadter v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 839 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 13, 1929

    This view is in accord with the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in United States v. … This portion of the opinion of the District Court was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Rodenbough, v. United States, 25 Fed. (2d) 13.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Old Colony Railroad v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 1025 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1927

    Baldwin Locomotive Works v. McCoach, 221 Fed. 59 ; 1 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 450; Chicago & Alton Railroad Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cls. 41; 3 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 3385. … See also Corn Exchange Bank v. Commissioner, 6 B. T. A. 158. The same principles which governed those cases would appear to govern the decision here.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • P. J. Clancy & Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 855 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1928

    CLANCY & CO., INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. P. J. Clancy & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 9172. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 855 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3433 ; June 27, 1928 , Promulgated *3433 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lakeland Grocery Co. v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 289 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 13, 1937

    A. 424; affd., sub nom Walter v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Independent Brick Co. v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 862 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 27, 1928

    United States v. White Dental Manufacturing Co. of Pennsylvania, 270 U. S. 398 ; Paul N. Myers, 7 B. T. A. 1072. … A. 952, and in Auburn & Alton Coal Co. v. United States, 61 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moody v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 987 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 15, 1940

    DeLappe v. Commissioner , 113 Fed. (2d) 48. The court in its opinion expressed the view that its own decision in Newman v. … The Board concluded that it was, relying upon Newman v. Commissioner (C. C. A. 5th, 1935) 76 F. (2d) 449, cert. denied, 296 U. S. 600 , and refusing to follow Lang v. Commissioner, (1938) 304 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gus Sun Booking Exchange Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 1197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 12, 1928

    upon these issues of fact will result in this Board holding petitioner to be a personal service corporation under the 1918 Act.” … We agree with the United States District Court in the case of Gus Sun Booking Exchange v. Deane, supra, that the United Booking Offices was not a stockholder.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tilles v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 545 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 16, 1938

    Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465 . … Judgment will be entered v/nder Bule 50.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.