Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.68s
Louisiana Iron & Supply Co. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 1244 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 13, 1941
The only question before the Board, is the right of the petitioner to percentage depletion under section 114 (b) (3). … Commissioner v. Elliott Petroleum Corporation, 82 Fed. (2d) 193. Cf. Thomas v. Perkins, 301 U. S. 655 ; F. H. E. Oil Co., 41 B. T. A. 130, 134; Cook Drilling Co., 38 B. T. A. 291.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGanahl Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 118 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 28, 1930
The deduction claimed v?as allowed by the Commissioner after a field investigation. … A. 932; affd., 41 Fed. (2d) 141; Clark Brown Grain Co., 18 B. T. A. 937; Home Ice Cream & Ice Co., 19 B. T. A. 762, and the cases therein cited.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Envelope Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 84 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 21, 1928
Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co., 267 U. S. 333 . … United States v. Phellis, 257 U. S. 156 .
Cited 0 timesPublished42 B.T.A. 91 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1940
The propriety of the addition of the $6,000 is the only issue for decision by the Board. The Board adopts as its findings of fact the stipulation of the parties. The petitioner and William G. … He concludes that, under the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Fitch, 309 U. S. 149 , the amounts are taxable to the wife, the present petitioner. See also Helvering v. Fuller, 310 U. S. 69 .
Cited 2 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 919 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 21, 1927
Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 . In the case of United States v. … However, I have carefully considered the opinion of the Board, and I am unconvinced of its asserted error. On August 15, 1927, the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWyman Bldg. Trust v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 155 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 18, 1941
The Board makes the following findings from the oral testimony. Louis E. Wyman, a son of Louis A., was an attorney. … Commissioner v. Gibbs-Preyer Trusts, 117 Fed. (2d) 619, affirming 39 B. T. A. 492; Cleveland Trust Co. v. Commissioner , 115 Fed. (2d) 481; certiorari denied, 312 U. S. 704 ; Lewis & Co. v. Commissioner, 301 U. S. 385 .
Cited 1 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 1252 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 20, 1934
Forbes v. Com missioner, 62 Fed. (2d) 571. … In the recent case of Taylor v. Commissioner, 70 Fed. (2d) 619, the court discussed the extent of the burden of proof resting upon the taxpayer in proceedings before this Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 521 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 3, 1939
Hill v. Commis sioner., 38 Fed. (2d) 165; Pope v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 420. The distinction between the transaction at bar and the cases just cited by us is obvious and clear. … A. 715; and Federal court cases, Chisholm v. Commissioner, 79 Fed. (2d) 14; and Helvering v. Walbridge, supra. In our opinion, none of the cases so cited support the contentions petitioners here mate.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIllinois Merchants Trust Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 818 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1928
This Board, and the courts, have frequently had occasion to consider and interpret the clause, “made in contemplation of death.” Thus, in Philip T. Starck, Executor, 3 B. T. … The same holding has been announced in Shwab v. Doyle, 269 Fed. 321 ; Meyer v. United States, 60 Ct. Cls., 474; Spreckels v. State, 30 Cal. App. 363 ; State v. Pabst, 139 Wis. 561 ; Rea v. Heiner, 6 Fed. (2d) 389.
Cited 1 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 362 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 9, 1935
The taxpayer is also cognizant of the decision of this Board in Annie C. Atwood, v. Commissioner, 29 B. T. … Brandeis, supra, and the other cases relied upon by the Board of Tax Appeals. Cf. Brooks v. United States, 6 Fed. Supp. 844; Connell v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 B.T.A. 67 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 15, 1925
Auerbach v. Commissioner Docket No. 1976. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 67 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2561 ; June 15, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 4, 1925 . *2561 1. … Taxpayer asks the Board to include now said additional sum of $1,345 as a part of the investment in said building. FINDINGS OF FACT.
Cited 2 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 1001 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 27, 1937
The petitioners rely strongly upon Farmers & Merchants Bank of Catlettsburg v. Commissioner, 59 Fed. (2d) 912, reversing the Board at 20 B. T. A. 622. … In Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey v. Commissioner, 79 Fed. (2d) 697, reversing the Board at 29 B. T.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNewaygo Portland Cement Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 1097 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 6, 1933
On authority of Lucas v. … Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United States, 286 U. S. 290 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedHarvey Friction Spring Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 309 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1928
The court in Matteson Co. v. … Kaufman, Limited, v.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 603 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 8, 1927
Kent v. Commissioner, 6 B. T. A. 614, the Board held that the petitioner should report as income for 1923, dividends declared and payable in 1923, .but not received by him until 1924. … Richter & Co. v. Light, 97 Conn. 364 ; 116 Atl. 600 ; Hyams v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co., 82 N. J. Eq. 507; 89 Atl. 37 (aff'd. 83 N. J. Eq. 705; 92 Atl. 588 ); Thairlwall v.
Cited 2 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 1279 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 28, 1941
He contends that Higgins v. … We think petitioner’s activities outside his farming operations did not constitute a trade or business carried on by him, under the authority of Higgins v. Commissioner, supra; City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 B.T.A. 147 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 20, 1940
The Board adopts as its findings of fact the facts as stipulated by the parties. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Rule 50. HaRbon concurs only in the result. Arundell dissents. The ease of Commissioner v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCapital Estates, Inc. v. Commissioner
46 B.T.A. 986 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 17, 1942
Gibbons v. Mahon, 136 U. S. 549 ; Long v. Rike, 50 Fed. (2d) 124. The shareholders’ resolution was merely hortatory. … In Houston Street Corporation v. Commissioner, 84 Fed. (2d) 821, it was held that the Board has jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency in income tax for which a withholding agent is in the first instance liable.
Cited 1 timesPublishedStromberg Electric Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 1170 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 3, 1927
Board, 14 Fed. (2d) 459, is applicable here. … Herein the instant case differs from the case of United States v. Board, supra, which was relied on by the *1180 petitioner.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCitizens Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 758 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 20, 1935
See Peyton Du-Pont Securities Co. v. Commissioner, 66 Fed. (2d) 718 (C. C. A., 2d Cir.); Fairless v. Commissioner, 67 Fed. (2d) 475 (C. C. A., 6th Cir.). … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the respondent. Teammell dissents. This amount is $10,000 cost less $500 written off in 1930 by a national bank examiner. SEC. 23. DEDUCTIONS FROM GROSS INCOME.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna