Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.44s
Furniture Exhibition Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 1279 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 24, 1931
A. 696; Golden Cycle Corporation v. Commissioner, 18 B. T. A. 118; affd., 51 Fed. (2d) 927. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule SO.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Casket Co. v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 1141 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1929
Co., 169 Fed. 628 ; Frackelton v. United States, 57 Ct. Cls. 587; Belmont-Smokeless Coal Co. v. United States Board of Tax Appeals, 277 Fed. 727 ; Covey v. Williamson, 286 Fed. 459 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the petitioner.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 271 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 19, 1937
The Board said: “Commonly, permanent improvements placed upon leased property by the lessee result immediately in income to the lessor. See Miller v. Gearin (C. C. A.), 258 Fed. 225 ; Cryan v. Wardell, supra. … It is true that in Miller v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWoodward Iron Co. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 1050 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 30, 1931
That with respect to the years 1921 and 1922 the Board has no jurisdiction for the reason that the notice of deficiency upon which the appeal was based In United States v. Kirby Lumber Co., 284 U. … Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U. S. 359, 364 . The stipulated facts of the instant case do not distinguish it from United States v. Kirby Lumber Co., supra, which controls the issue here.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMuskegon Motor Specialties Co. v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 551 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1941
Nelson Co. v. Helvering, 296 U. S. 374 ; Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co., 296 U. S. 378 ; Miller v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 6th Cir.), 84 Fed. (2d) 415. … Nelson Co. v. Helvering, supra. And that is all the provision requires.
Cited 1 timesPublished43 B.T.A. 809 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1941
A question similar to this in principle was involved in the Grmsden case as determined by the Board, but it was not included in the subject of review by the Circuit Court which affirmed the Board’s decision in Gransden & … Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 550 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1935
In Miles v. … In Helvering v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity Baking Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 593 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 7, 1928
We are satisfied from the evidence that the Board has jurisdiction of this case. … In the recent case of Art Metal Works v. Commissioner, 9 B. T. A. 491, we held, overruling Reliance Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 7 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 256 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 12, 1937
Witthaus v. Schack, 105 N. Y. 332 , 11 N. E. 649 ; Crawford v. Woods, 191 N. Y. S. 786; Stokes v. Stokes, 196 N. Y. S. 184. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 335 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 19, 1929
It is unnecessary to pass upon these contentions for the reason that under the decision of the Supreme Court in Nichols v. Coolidge. 274 U. S. 531 , and the decisions of the Board in Edward H. Alsop, 7 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered vmxLer Rule 50. Arundell dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 804 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1937
Burnet v. Thompson Oil & Gas Co., 283 U. S. 301, 304 . Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U. S. 103 ; Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U. S. 1, 23, 24 . Helvering v. Independent Life Insurance Co., 292 U. … A. 1251; and Hutton v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 459, affirming 12 B. T. A. 265. In Hutton v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJamison Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner (Na)
24 B.T.A. 554 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 2, 1931
A. 1322; La-Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 377 . See also A. C. F. Gasoline Co., 6 B. T. A. 1337; Pacific Coast Redwood Co., 5 B. T. A. 423. … A. 875; Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co., 267 U. S. 364 ; Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co., 242 U. S. 503 ; and United States v. Biwabik Mining Co., 247 U. S. 116 .
Modified by Hutchinson Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 24 B.T.A. 973 (1931)Cited 7 timesPublished19 B.T.A. 111 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1930
show that *122 the Board does not have jurisdiction. … American Auto Trimming Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 473 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 29, 1933
Hadley v. Commissioner, 36 Fed. (2d) 543, affirming 6 B.T.A. 1031 . The other shareholders have not complained and must therefore, in this proceeding, be deemed to have ratified. In the case of Hugh H. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMartin Hotel Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 826 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 15, 1930
United States Refining Co. v. Trinidad, 222 Fed. 1006 ; Hamilton v. Home Insurance Co., 137 U. S. 370 ; Jefferson Fire Ins. Co. v. Bierce, 183 Fed. 588 ; Mitchell v. Dougherty, 90 Fed. 639 . … This conclusion is not in conflict with the decision in the case of United States v. John Barth Co., 279 U. S. 370 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedEmployes' Ben. Asso. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 1166 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1929
EMPLOYES' BENEFIT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Employes' Ben. Asso. v. Commissioner Docket No. 12421. … FUNDS - Section V. 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChicago Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 916 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 24, 1930
City of Lincoln v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R. Co., 93 Nebr. 263; 140 N. W. 147 . We are of the opinion that the cost of the flood wall was a capital expenditure. … Keviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Bule 50, Marquette concurs in the result only.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBalkan Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
36 B.T.A. 1183 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 22, 1937
In Krausz v. … Kahle v. Commissioner, 43 Fed. (2d) 61; certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 892 . Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent. Leech concurs solely on the authority of Krausz v. United States, 14 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 1081 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 29, 1927
Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. S. 110 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 dags’ notice, wider Bule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBurroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 101 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 9, 1929
Justice Holmes in United States v. Sullivan, 274 U. S. 259 , seem particularly pertinent. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna