Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
611 results
0.58s
United Business Corp. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 83 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 25, 1935
All of its issued capital stock has been held by Smith, except for three qualifying shares. … In our opinion it establishes the very purpose proscribed by the statute.
Cited 7 timesPublished23 B.T.A. 236 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1931
The Bartlett Trust Company was also duly qualified as the executor of the decedent's estate. … Petitioner contends that section 302(g) clearly and unambiguously includes in the gross estate only the amount of insurance receivable by the executor and that the respondent, in taxing these proceeds, extended the application
Cited 9 timesPublishedHotel Patten Co. v. Commissioner
13 B.T.A. 943 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 12, 1928
exceed the par value of the original stock or shares specifically issued therefor, unless the actual cash value of such tangible property at the time paid in is shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner to have been clearly … The petitioners claim that the said lease had a value of at least $100,000 at the time of its *950 assignment, that the figure of $60,000 was merely nominal because Pound owned all of the stock except qualifying shares and
Cited 0 timesPublished3 B.T.A. 348 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 16, 1926
The evidence in support of the facts upon which the taxpayer relies to establish its first contention is clear and convincing. … Properly qualified experts on real estate and other asset values testified as to the fair market values of the properties acquired by purchase and gift at February 1, 1919.
Cited 5 timesPublished33 B.T.A. 1020 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 11, 1936
From them, Bremen appears clearly as the place of domicil. … The fact that his right to possession may have been conditioned upon the bank’s release of the pledge does not qualify his ownership so as to affect his gross estate.
Cited 3 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 1014 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 6, 1934
Not only is it never presumed, but the ordinary preponderance of evidence is not sufficient to establish such a charge. … In my opinion, it is only when the taxpayer denies fraud that the burden of proof to establish it is upon the Commissioner.
Cited 46 timesPublishedEstate of Mead v. Commissioner
41 B.T.A. 424 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 20, 1940
Petitioners are the duly qualified executors of the estate of Giles W. Mead, who died December 4, 1937, a resident of Beverly Hills, California. … The trust instrument established two separate trust funds, designated as "Trust Fund A" and "Trust Fund B."
Cited 4 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 463 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 6, 1938
We are of the opinion that Farr’s case for the reasons stated is clearly distinguishable from the instant case, and that the definition of a “short sale” there set out must be qualified by the condition that it is intended … Since the evidence is insufficient to establish the probable life of the house, we must hold on this point for the respondent. Decision will be entered umder Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 1144 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 11, 1931
The widow and the sons of decedent did not contest the provisions of the will, but accepted the same and duly qualified as executors thereof. … It clearly appears that the greater part of the decedent’s estate represented income and profits from his real estate business.
Cited 2 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 977 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 7, 1937
The record clearly establishes that petitioner had no knowledge of the purchase by Coalesced of the stock of the Pittsburgh Coal Co. until some months after it occurred. … Here the evidence does not establish an improper motive. The sale by petitioner of Pittsburgh Coal Co. stock is clearly demonstrated to have been bona fide and legal in all aspects.
Cited 26 timesPublishedWest Side Tennis Club v. Commissioner
39 B.T.A. 149 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 20, 1939
It was not necessary for an applicant for admission to the tournaments, in order to be in a position to qualify as a spectator, to manifest the same interest in tennis or the normal social and recreational activities of the … We conclude that the petitioner has failed to establish its right to exemption and accordingly sustain the action of the respondent in holding it to be subject to tax.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTall Timber Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 300 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1929
exceed the par value of the original stock or shares specifically issued therefor, unless the actual cash value of such tangible property at the time paid in is shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner to have been clearly … Pack, who qualified as an expert on timber properties, testified that he considered the timber was worth $6 a thousand in December, 1912, and that the other parties likewise recognized that this was the approximate value
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 486 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1932
They are the duly appointed and qualified surviving executors of the will of the said decedent. … Paragraph (b)(2) when read in connection with paragraph (a)(2) clearly contemplates that deductions may be allowed only when they constitute income to the recipients. *1314 ; ; ; .
Cited 6 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 1070 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1934
Crouse, 135 Cal. 14 , in which the Supreme Court of California held that both real and personal property descend directly to the beneficiary named in the will, with a qualified right in the personal representative who holds … Clearly the petitioner had no dominion or control over, and could not have sold, any of the particular assets until there had been a division of the estate among herself and the other legatees *1073 and certain specific assets
Cited 0 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 384 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 10, 1932
The evidence establishes that petitioner rendered personal services to the Alpha School and that at least a part of the income of the school was attributable to his services. … Clearly, those instructors would not have been engaged if petitioner could have conducted the school on the same scale without them.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 227 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 23, 1941
He had an established place of abode or residence in France for a number of years before, during, and after 1936. … Clearly, he never resided there and had no intention to reside there.
Cited 1 timesPublished43 B.T.A. 433 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 28, 1941
. *434 The petition alleges that the petitioners are the duly qualified, appointed, and acting executors of the estate of Charles Schmalstig, who died August 4, 1935, a resident of Cincinnati, Ohio, leaving an estate of approximately … This clearly indicates that the claim for refund was the subject of the letter and the disallowance of such claim — no more and no less — was its object.
Cited 6 timesPublished33 B.T.A. 1081 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 11, 1936
The questions presented and the facts are clearly distinguishable from the instant proceeding. … Whether that service was of a legal or accounting nature, a question upon which the parties disagree, it is admitted that the petitioners’ wives were not qualified along either line nor is it contended that they rendered
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 927 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 14, 1936
Not only is it never presumed, but the ordinary preponderance of evidence is not sufficient to establish such a charge. … establishing fraud, as in M.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMobile Bar Pilots Ass'n v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 12 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 3, 1936
The business of the association was to furnish qualified licensed pilots for the purpose of piloting boats across Mobile Bar and into and out of the harbor of Mobile, Alabama. … We do not think this contention is sound as petitioner, clearly, was not embraced within any of the classes set out in these subsections.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna