Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.71s
New York Zinc Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 9 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1932
At that date three veins of ore on the Brown and White tracts had been worked — Brown No. 1 and No. 2, 350 and 100 feet, respectively; the White vein, 150 feet — and drifting had been done at various levels to these depths … It is in the light of all of their views that the duty is upon the Board to consider the facts in evidence and find the ultimate fact of value; and thus we find no preponderance of the evidence to justify, let alone compel
Cited 1 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 1400 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 24, 1929
Co. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 227 , 29 S. Ct. 252 , 53 L. Ed. 480 . And see Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. … See Vane v. Newcombe, 132 U. S. 220 .
Cited 1 timesPublished6 B.T.A. 323 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 26, 1927
The record is convincing that the leases, whether those acquired by the Mohawk Oil Co. from it predecessor partnership, Brown and Dyer, or those acquired under assignment from Brown and Bernstein, had no substantial value … The question before the Board is, Did Bernstein and his wife acquire, in the year 1919, any gain out of these transactions?
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorgia Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 1153 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 18, 1933
BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors. JOSEPH E. BOSTON, President. … BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 B.T.A. 828 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 19, 1931
WILLIAM GAHAGEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Gahagen v. Commissioner Docket No. 28514. … the petitioner and Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGantz Tank Co. v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 212 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1929
On motion of the respondent, duly granted, the hearing on the case was limited to the issues specified in sections (a) and (b) of Rule 62 of the Board’s rules of practice. … Browning, supra; Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co., 16 B. T. A. 41. Further proceedings will be had under Rule 62 (c) and (d).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUncasville Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 920 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 12, 1930
S. 110 ; Bogle & Co. v. Commissioner, 26 Fed. (2d) 771; Balaban & Katz Corporation v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 807; Woodside Cotton Mills, 13 B. T. A. 266; Pittsburgh Hotels Co., 15 B. T. A. 587. … Brown, 18 B. T. A. 859. The respondent’s determinations as to value on March 1, 1913, profit, and depreciation and obsolescence are sustained.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUncasville Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 920 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 12, 1930
S. 110 ; Bogle & Co. v. Commissioner, 26 Fed. (2d) 771; Balaban & Katz Corporation v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 807; Woodside Cotton Mills, 13 B. T. A. 266; Pittsburgh Hotels Co., 15 B. T. A. 587. … Brown, 18 B. T. A. 859. The respondent’s determinations as to value on March 1, 1913, profit, and depreciation and obsolescence are sustained.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWelz & Zeuveck, Inc. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 1416 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 16, 1928
In Brown v. Spofford, 95 U. … Keviewed by the Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 813 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1931
Miller v. Gearin, 258 Fed. 225 ; certiorari denied, 250 U. S. 667 ; Cryan v. Wardell, 263 Fed. 248 . … Brown, 4 B. T. A. 1129; Shelby D. Scott, 9 B. T. A. 1219; Joseph L. B. Alexander, 13 B. T. A. 1169; James M. Butler, 19 B. T. A. 718. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished45 B.T.A. 1056 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 18, 1941
Bergan v. Commissioner, 80 Fed. (2d) 89; Leach v. Commissioner, 50 Fed. (2d) 371; Inland Products Co. v. Blair, 31 Fed. (2d) 867; Bohemian Breweries, Inc. v. United States, 27 Fed. Supp. 588; Joseph V. Horn, 23 B. T. … Brown, supra. [10 B. T. A. 1122); and see Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co., 15 B. T. A. 1401.
Cited 1 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 644 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 11, 1933
Brown, Trustee, supra, and Margaret B. … Brown, Trustee, supra, and Margaret B. Sparrow et al., Trustees, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCentral United Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 588 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 27, 1935
A. 354; affd., 77 Fed. (2d) 119; Russell-Miller Milling Co. v. Helvering, 69 Fed. (2d) 392; affd., 27 B. T. A. 405. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered u/nder Bule 50. Moeeis dissents. … Brown, 10 B. T. A. 1122. In the latter case the Board quoted with approval from Producers Fuel Co., 1 B. T.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWhitehouse Leather Prods. Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 714 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 19, 1928
Under the decisions of the Board in Fred T. Ley & Co., 9 B. T. A. 749, and M. Brown & Co., 9 B. T. A. 753, assessment and collection of the deficiency determined is barred by the statute of limitations.
Cited 1 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 861 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 28, 1935
Brown Coal & Coke Co., infra, the Board held that even if not legally organized to carry on business with the public under the laws of the State of Kentucky, the record warranted the conclusion that the corporation was an … Brown Coal & Coke Co., supra, the Board stated that “ The evidence indicates that E. L.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBaird Machine Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 801 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1930
See Rule 30 of the Board’s rules of practice. The Board will not sustain this petitioner in its contention here; there is no real issue. … Brown, 9 B. T. A. 521, 18 B. T. A. 859. Also see Alameda Investment Co. v. McLaughlin, 33 Fed. (2d) 120. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 3 timesPublished13 B.T.A. 726 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 2, 1928
Brown, owned one-half of the accounts receivable of the partnership and that on dissolution petitioner purchased his interest therein, paying therefor their face value. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFibre Container Co. v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 575 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 12, 1927
FIBRE CONTAINER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Fibre Container Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 7475. … Brown, sister-in-law of Carrie J. Brown. Mary B. Harter, sister-in-law of Carrie J. Brown. Elizabeth A. Harter, sister-in-law of Carrie J. Brown. Agnes R. Dougherty, wife of Gerald A. Dougherty.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 949 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 22, 1932
The Board denied the respondent’s motion and accepted jurisdiction of the appeal. (See Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, 282 U. S. 283 .) … Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. S. 346 ; Russell v. United States, 278 U. S. 181 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeystone Coal & Mining Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 295 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1928
Brown & Co. v. Commissioner, 9 B. T. A. 753. … However, it has been decided by the United States Supreme Court in Heiner v. Colonial Trust Co., 275 U. S. 232 , that such income is taxable. Terrell Co. v. Commissioner, 9 B. T. A. 1131.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna