Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.27s
41 B.T.A. 935 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1940
United States v. Sullivan, 274 U. S. 259 . … A., 1st Cir.); Saenger, Inc. v. Commissioner, 84 Fed. (2d) 23 (C. C. A., 5th Cir.).
Cited 6 timesPublishedFirst Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 876 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 16, 1937
He relies upon Board of Commissioners v. Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank, 123 N. E. 130 (Indiana, 1919). … This was, in our opinion, a valid consideration for the contract, which further distinguishes the instant proceeding from Board of Commissioners v. Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank.
Cited 13 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 660 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 5, 1931
S. 862 ; affirming the Board’s decision in Taylor Oil & Gas Co., 15 B. T. A. 609. … On the authority of Taylor Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner, supra, we affirm the action of the Commissioner on this issue. Cf. Southern Ice & Fuel Co., 10 B. T. A. 1213; James Duggan, 18 B. T. A. 608; George M.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 248 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1931
Dalmas v. Philipsburg & Susguehanna Valley Railroad, Co., 254 Pa. 9 ; 98 Atl. 796 : Punxsatawny Borough v. Phillips Gas & Oil Co., 238 Pa. 23 ; 85 Atl. 1003 ; Petry v. Harwood Electric Co., 280 Pa. 142 ; 124 Atl. 302 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment of no deficiency will he entered.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLiberty National Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 510 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 16, 1929
To hold otherwise would be to extend the purposes and effects of affiliation for income-tax purposes by implication and this is not within the power of the Commissioner or of the Board. … Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 ; Benziger v. United States, 192 U. S. 38 ; Shwab v. Doyle, 248 U. S. 529 ; and United States v. Anderson, 263 U. S. 179, 187 . Reviewed by the Board.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 981 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 1, 1934
By orders entered on August 10, 1933, the Chairman of the Board directed that “ the orders of Division No. 4, entered July 12, 1933,” be reviewed by the Board. … McWilliams v. Excelsior Coal Co., 298 Fed. 844 .
Modified by Buzard v. Helvering, 77 F.2d 391 (1935)Cited 3 timesPublishedBank of America Nat'l Asso. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 1273 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 29, 1930
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF JAMES HALE BATES, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bank of America Nat'l Asso. v. Commissioner Docket No. 40078. … Brown, Esq., for the petitioner. Harold Allen, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHighway Trailer Co. v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 792 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 1, 1933
The Board, in its opinion, stated: The statute [sec. 234 (a) (4) Bev. … In Lucas v.
Cited 5 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 65 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 15, 1932
But the Board held to the contrary and denied taxpayer’s contention. The Garrieron case was before the Board again in 20 B. T. … . *70 The latter case was affirmed in Cameron v. Commissioner, 56 Fed. (2d) 1021.
Cited 6 timesPublished48 Ohio Law. Abs. 103 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 1, 1947
See Zangerle, Aud. v The Standard Oil Company of Ohio, 144 Oh St, 506; The Standard Oil Company v Zangerle, Auditor, 144 Oh St, 523. … See Cincinnati et al v Davis, 58 Oh St 225, 234; Industrial Commission v Vail, 110 Oh St 304; State ex rel Podley v Industrial Commission, 127 Oh St 583; State ex rel. v Atkinson, 138 Oh St, 157, 162.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGodfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 366 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 28, 1939
In United States v. Anderson, 269 U. … Decision will he entered v/nder Bule BO.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 81 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 7, 1932
See Thiry v. Banner Window Glass Co., 81 W. Va. 39 ; 93 S. E. 958 ; Baker v. Smith, 41 R. I. 17; 102 Atl. 721 ; Kahn v. Colonial Fuel Corporation, 198 N. Y. S. 596. … Gilbert Paper Co. v. Prankard, 198 N. Y. S. 25; Cox v. Leahy, 204 N. Y. S. 741.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOhio-Clover Leaf Dairy Co. v. Commissioner
13 B.T.A. 1320 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1928
In support of its contention the petitioner calls our attention to the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, in the case of Wiener v. … Ostheimer, supra, the Board said: In order that an item may be accrued, however, a liability must actually be incurred in the taxable year. Schuster & Co., v. Williams, 283 Fed. 115 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedHavana Elec. Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 782 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 14, 1936
The Board stated? … Reviewed by the Board. Judgments will loe entered wider Rule 50. Leech dissents.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCalifornia Brewing Asso. v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 721 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 26, 1941
Commissioner v. Forest Glen Creamery Co., 98 Fed. (2d) 968. … Maffit v. Becker, 65 Fed. (2d) 880; White v. United States, 22 Fed. Supp. 821; Beverly Wall Paper Co. v. Commissioner, 98 Fed. (2d) 211. 3.
Cited 14 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 857 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 13, 1934
I am also of the opinion that the Board’s decision in this case is contrary to Rose v. Twist Co. of Georgia, 28 Fed. (2d) 767; Taplin v. Commissioner, 41 Fed. (2d) 454; Durkee v. … Welch, 49 Fed. (2d) 339; and Commissioner v. Van Vorst, 59 Fed. (2d) 677.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 B.T.A. 1371 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1927
The Commissioner relies on the case of Noel v. Parrott (C. C. A., Fourth Circuit), 15 Fed. (2d) 669, sustaining the United States Board of Tax Appeals in the Appeal of John H. Parrott, 1 B. T. … A. 50, but in the opinion of the Board the facts in these cases are not similar to those in the instant case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreenfield Bros. Clothing Co. v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 9 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 8, 1927
In the case of Davidson & Case Lumber Co. v. … In Chattanooga Savings Bank v.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 458 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 17, 1939
.); Helvering v. Stifel, 75 Fed. (2d) 583, affirming memorandum opinion of the Board; Olive Hume Oliver, 30 B. T. A. 1381; aff'd., 78 Fed. (2d) 561 (C. C. A., 3d Cir.); Commissioner v. … It was said in Helvering v. Stifel, supra, that “there is no practicable way of determining the cost of the shares received in exchange” other than that adopted by the Board in the Von Gwnten case.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 B.T.A. 152 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1930
of Tax Appeals, or (2) if an appeal has been filed, then by the number of days between the date of the mailing of such notice and the date of the final decision by the Board. … Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna