Case law

Henderson v. GlobalLab Solutions, Inc.

310 F.R.D. 400 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 26, 2015

Co, Inc. v. … Slatton v. Martin K. Eby Const.

Day

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 12, 2026

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). … P. 41(b); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986). “At the same time, however, ‘dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) is a drastic sanction which should be exercised sparingly.’” Id. (quoting Pardee v.

Day

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 12, 2026

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). … P. 41(b); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986). “At the same time, however, ‘dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) is a drastic sanction which should be exercised sparingly.’” Id. (quoting Pardee v.

Smith v. Mitchell

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 10, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

Karr v. Townsend

606 F. Supp. 1121 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 1, 1985

Bd. of Regents v. Roth, supra; Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Connell v. … In Wellner v. Minnesota State Junior College Board, 487 F.2d 153 (8th Cir.1973), the court was faced with a similar situation.

Wagner v. Hawkins

634 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 28, 1986

Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), and Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

Robert Scott Miller v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 7, 2026

Brown v. Colvin, 825 F. 3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016). Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but it is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner’s decision. … Craig Brown, an ophthalmologist, on March 25, 2024, for an optic nerve/vascular consult. (Tr. 924-928).

Coffelt v. Omaha School District

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 11, 2018

Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). … In McCook v.

McLouth v. General Telephone Co. of the Southwest

164 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 26, 1958

Peek v. Henderson, 208 Ark. 238 , 185 S.W.2d 704 , and Stair v. … In Laser v.

Cole v. Williams

624 F. Supp. 712 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 4, 1985

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Simblest v. … That seemed to be the law in the eighth circuit until 1972, Bates v. Hensley, 414 F.2d 1006 (1969). However, in Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v.

Bothwell v. Sieger

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jul 1, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). Furthermore, a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is otherwise specified. FED. R. CIV. … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

Brewer

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Nov 20, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). … P. 41(b); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986). “At the same time, however, ‘dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) is a drastic sanction which should be exercised sparingly.’” Id. (quoting Pardee v.

Kruel v. John Doe

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 8, 2024

at 539-40; see also Brown-El v. … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty, Ok. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan. R.

33 F. 900 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 2, 1888

Brown v. Beatty, 69 Amer. Dec. 389; Moale v. City of Baltimore, 61 Amer. Dec. 278; Alexander v. Mayor, 46 Amer. Dec. 630. The right of eminent domain is a right distinguished from, and paramount to, ultimate ownership. … Railroad Co., 23 Wall. 108 ; Brown v. Beatty, 69 Amer. Dec. 392; Railroad Co. v. Applegate, 33 Amer. Dec. 497. It was held in Secombe v.

ANTHONY CHARLES KNAPP v. BARBARA O’GUIN

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Dec 23, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). Furthermore, a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is otherwise specified. Fed R. Civ. … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

White

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 23, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). Furthermore, a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is otherwise specified. FED. R. CIV. … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

Cross v. Miller

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 24, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). Furthermore, a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is otherwise specified. Fed. R. Civ. … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

Ellison

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Nov 20, 2025

Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). Furthermore, a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is otherwise specified. FED. R. CIV. … P. 41(b); Brown, 806 F.2d at 803.

United States v. Jepsen

131 F. Supp. 2d 1076 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 17, 2000

Crain v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 920 F.2d 1402 , 1405-06 (8th Cir.1990). Discussion As we noted above, both sides seek summary judgment on count one. Defendants also seek summary judgment on count two. 1. … Brown v. Charlestowne Group, Ltd., 221 Ill.App.3d 44 , 163 Ill.Dec. 677 , 581 N.E.2d 831, 832 (1991). *1086 Interest under the note was to be paid yearly. It is undisputed no payments of any Mnd were made on the note.

Boyd v. Culpepper

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 16, 2019

See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating a district court has the power to dismiss an action based on “the plaintiff’s failure to comply with any court order”). … Accordingly, the claims for unlawful arrest against Defendants McBrayer, Singleton, Clark, Morris, Brown, and Hughes should be dismissed without prejudice. See Schafer v.