Case law

Gray v. University of Arkansas

658 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 20, 1987

Textron, Inc., 600 F.2d 1003 (1st Cir.1979), and Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106 (1st Cir.1979)). … See Taylor v. Teletype Corp., 648 F.2d 1129 , 1135 n. 14 (8th Cir.1981), and Craik v. The Minnesota State University Board, 731 F.2d 465, 472 (8th Cir.1984).

O'Neal v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

588 F. Supp. 1274 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jul 16, 1984

Brown, this time complaining of pain in his neck and shoulders. Dr. Brown prescribed Norflex, Tanderil, and Fiorinal # 2, and instructed him to return if his condition was not better in ten days. … Because the Secretary may not terminate benefits simply upon a reappraisal of the evidence from a prior determination, Smith v.

Bushmiaer v. United States

131 F. Supp. 589 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 27, 1955

In Cheatham v. … The Board’s duty under the act of 1924 was to hear, consider, and decide whether deficiencies reported by the Commissioner were right.” In Phillips v.

Mid-America Truck & Equipment, Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.

519 F. Supp. 461 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jul 15, 1981

Edwards v. *464 Johnson, 227 Ark. 345, 298 S.W.2d 336 (1957). See also Vanderboom v. Sexton, 460 F.2d 362 (8th Cir. 1972). … Its claims for lost profits, not allowed in a fraud action under New York law, Foster v.

Taylor Ex Rel. ANB Financial, N.A v. ANB Bancshares, Inc.

682 F. Supp. 2d 970 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Dec 15, 2009

(citing Bueford, 991 F.2d at 485 ); Henderson v. Bank of New England, 986 F.2d 319 (9th Cir.1993); Office and Professional Employees Int’l Union Local 2 v. FDIC, 962 F.2d 63 (D.C.Cir.1992); Meliezer v. … Reierson v. RTC, 16 F.3d 889, 891-92 (8th Cir.1994) (citation omitted). In RTC Mortgage Trust v.

Cummins v. Celebrezze

222 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 10, 1963

Not until I went back there then did I find out that my boss was Brown and Rudd, had destroyed all medical records and examinations because we had to take a physical before we went to work for Brown and Rudd. … See Park v. Celebrezze, (W.D.Ark.1963) 214 F.Supp. 153 .

United States v. Article of Device Consisting of 2 Devices, More or Less, Labeled in Part: "Lindquist Chronosonic Ultrasound Model 401B Serial 9845 (or 9846)"

255 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jun 27, 1966

In Barsky v. … In Dent v.

Labarge, Inc. v. UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INC.

751 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Nov 9, 1990

See e.g., Coakley & Williams, Inc. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp., 706 F.2d 456 (4th Cir.1983); Standard Alliance Indus., Inc. v. … See e.g., Jones v.

Pearson v. Gardner

267 F. Supp. 498 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 5, 1967

Thompson v. Social Security Board, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 154 F.2d 204 ; United States v. LaLone, 9 Cir., 152 F.2d 43 ; Social Security Board v. Warren, 8 Cir., 142 F.2d 974 ; Walker v. … South v. Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir., 131 F.2d 748 ; United States v. Willard Tablet Co., 7 Cir., 141 F.2d 141 [ 152 A.L.R. 1194 ].

Welch v. Breckenridge

284 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 7, 1968

In Reigel v. … Hod Carriers, etc. v. Mason Tenders, etc. (2 Cir. 1961), 291 F.2d 496 . Durkin v. Murray (D.C.D.C.1950), 90 F.Supp. 367 , on page 368, approved and followed Fish v.

Mackey v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

168 F. Supp. 3d 1162 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 7, 2016

Owen’s characterization of the Nursing Board employee’s interpretation, or contacted the Nursing Board itself for clarification. Instead, it chose to do neither. Based on the Nursing Board employee’s interpretation, Ms. … See Hillery v. Metro. Life Ins.

Steel v. Alma Public School District

162 F. Supp. 2d 1083 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 22, 2001

See Kinman v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist, 171 F.3d 607 , 610-11 (8th Cir.1999). As Title IX and Title VI are parallel to each other and operate in the same manner, see Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent Sch. … See Smith v. Metropolitan Sch. Dist. Perry Township, 128 F.3d 1014 , 1020-21 & n. 2 (7th Cir.1997).

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Miller Levee Dist. No. 2

197 F. 815 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jul 10, 1912

Railway Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Appanoose County, Iowa, 182 Fed. 291 , 104 C. C. A. 573 , 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1117. … Railway Company v. Drainage Commissioners, supra. The plaintiff relies on the case of Cairo, V. & C. R. Co. v. Brevoort Railway Co. (C. C.) 62 Fed. 129 , 25 L. R. A. 527, and Wright v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 175 Fed. 845 .

J. H. Phipps Lumber Co. v. Omaha Hardwood Lumber Co.

40 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Sep 5, 1941

In Pierce v. … Co., supra; Anderson-Tully Co. v. Gillett Lbr. Co., supra; Pierce v. Fioretti, supra.

Ford v. Gardner

279 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 19, 1968

Brown in 1966. He testified that he wears a back brace now except when he lies down; that Dr. Brown wanted to operate but that Dr. … Aaron v. Fleming, D.C., 168 F.Supp. 291; Corn v. Flemming, D.C., 184 F.Supp. 490 ; Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. N. L. R. B., 305 U.S. 197, at pg. 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, at pg. 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 .

United States v. ARTICLE CONSISTING OF 2 DEVICES, ETC.

255 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jun 27, 1966

In Barsky v. … In Dent v.

Reeves v. Mabry

480 F. Supp. 529 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 24, 1979

The State called Paul Brown, the Sebastian County Circuit Clerk, who testified. Mr. Brown brought three files from his office. … Cox v.

Johnson v. City Council of Green Forest, Ark.

545 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 25, 1982

Bishop v. Wood, supra; Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Williams v. Day, 553 F.2d 1160 (8th Cir. 1977); Kyles v. Eastern Nebraska Human Services, 632 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1980); and Brouillette v. … See Buhr v. Buffalo Public School District No. 38, 509 F.2d 1196, 1199 (8th Cir. 1974); . Wellner v. Minnesota State Junior College Board, 487 F.2d 153 (8th Cir. 1973). Cf. Horowitz v.

Camden v. Harris

109 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 12, 1953

In Brown v. Cleveland Tractor Co., 265 Mich. 475 , 251 N.W. 557 , and, again, in Flynn v. … Brown v. Cleveland Tractor Co., 265 Mich. 475 , 251 N.W. 557 ; Morrow v. Asher, D.C., 55 F.2d 365 ; Day v. Bush, 18 La.App. 682 , 139 So. 42 .’ ” At the time the decision in Kerr, Administrator v.

State v. Central Surety & Insurance

102 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jan 31, 1952

In doing so, the court stated, 341 U.S. at page 99, 71 S.Ct at page 578: “It is common practice, as we noted in Labor Board v. … The result is as plain as if the rack, the wheel, and the thumb screw —the ancient methods of securing evidence by torture, Brown v.