Case law

Young v. Everett

6 Ark. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 3, 1982

The telephone conversation between the employer and the Agency employee was hearsay, and does not constitute substantial evidence to support the decision of the Board. In Smith v. … The same conclusion was reached in Bockman v. Arkansas State Medical Board, 229 Ark. 143 , 313 S.W.2d 826 (1958), relied upon in Smith v.

Ramsey v. Everett

7 Ark. App. 120 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 12, 1983

In Mark Smith v. … We reversed the Board and remanded for a hearing consistent with Leardis Smith v.

Stroud v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 29, 2014

OF REVIEW V. … We review the decision of the Appeal tribunal as the Board’s decision pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-525, and reverse and remand because the Board’s decision and this appeal are premature.

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Mississippi County, Inc. v. Kalyan

450 S.W.3d 681 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 10, 2014

See, e.g., Coleman v. Utley, 153 Ark. 233, 240 S.W. 10 (1922). Dr. … He cites Willis v.

Thompson v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 14, 2014

Owens v. Director, 55 Ark. App. 255, 935 S.W.2d 285 (1996). What is “good cause” is dependent upon a consideration of all the facts and circumstances in each case. Magee v. Director, 75 Ark. … Valentine v. Dir., Dep’t of Workforce Servs., 2012 Ark. App. 612, at 2 (citing Snyder v. Dir., Dep’t of Workforce Servs., 81 Ark. App. 262, 263, 101 S.W.3d 270, 271 (2003)).

Corben Rane Hinton v. State of Arkansas

2026 Ark. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 20, 2026

For the reasons discussed in Hinton v. State, 2026 Ark. … MURPHY and BROWN, JJ., agree. Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant. One brief only. 2

Tyrone Lever v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2025

See Brown v. … Scaggs v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 142, 596 S.W.3d 562. Moreover, matters such as evaluating a witness’s credibility and resolving inconsistencies in the evidence are issues for the jury and not the court. Brown v.

Aleasia Mason v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2024 Ark. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 6, 2024

V. … While our role in these cases is limited, we are not here to merely ratify the decision of the Board. Langston v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 601, at 3.

Jones v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2014

Rivas v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 91, at 1–2 (citing Baldor Elec. v. Dir., 71 Ark. App. 166, 168–69, 27 S.W.3d 771, 773 (2000)). … We review the Board’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision, and credibility calls are for the finder of fact. Patterson v. Dir., 2014 Ark. App. 113, at 5.

Superior Senior Care, Inc. v. Director

73 Ark. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 2, 2001

Code Ann. § 11-10-210 (Supp. 1999) and Barb’s 3-D Demo Serv. v. Director, 69 Ark. App. 350 , 13 S.W.3d 206 (2000). … There was no appeal of the employer-coverage issues before the Board, and the Board made no determination as to the employer-coverage issues; therefore, the Board properly refused to consider the proffered evidence.

Gass v. State

17 Ark. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1986

Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973); United States v. West, 557 F.2d 151 (8th Cir. 1977). In Brown, the appellant was accused of criminal conspiracy to transport stolen goods in interstate commerce. … Brown, 411 U.S. at 229 .

Antonio Bailey v. State of Arkansas

615 S.W.3d 763 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 27, 2021

Brown v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 198, at 6, 595 S.W.3d 456, 460. Self-defense is “largely a matter of the defendant’s intent and is generally a fact question for the jury.” Kauffeld v. State, 2017 Ark. … Brown, 2020 Ark. App. 198, at 6, 595 S.W.3d at 460.

Eifling v. Southbend, Inc.

500 S.W.3d 756 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 19, 2016

Whitecotton v. Owen, 2016 Ark. App. 120, at 1, 487 S.W.3d 380, 382. … Reynolds v. GFM, LLC, 2013 Ark. App. 484, 429 S.W.3d 336.

Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist. v. Tenner

2013 Ark. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

Ctr. v. Chrisman, 2012 Ark. App. 475. … Jim Walter Homes v. Beard, 82 Ark. App. 607, 120 S.W.3d 160 (2003). Stated differently, an employer takes an employee as it finds her. Hickman v. Kellogg, Brown & Root, 372 Ark. 501, 277 S.W.3d 591 (2008).

Nucor Steel. v. Dir.

2016 Ark. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 7, 2016

ABRAMSON, Judge Appellant Nucor Steel (“Nucor”), a corporation, appeals from the Arkansas Board of Review’s March 10, 2016 decision, reversing the Appeal Tribunal and finding that the claimant, Keith Ledbetter, … Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co., 370 Ark. 477, 261 S.W.3d 454 (2007).

Thomas John Kennedy of Arkansas v. Ausbrooks

482 S.W.3d 335 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 3, 2016

See also Hamilton v. Allen, 100 Ark. … ABRAMSON and BROWN, JJ., agree. Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C., by: Benjamin D. Jackson, for appellants.

Vicki Harder v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2024 Ark. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 27, 2024

Standard of Review Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 205, 575 S.W.3d 186. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark.

Beck v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

65 Ark. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 13, 1999

On appeal, this court reviews the findings of fact of the Board of Review in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, only reversing where the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. McKissick v. … Kimble v. Director, 60 Ark. App. 36 , 959 S.W.2d 66 (1997).

Shane Perry v. Brandie Perry

594 S.W.3d 126 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 29, 2020

Langston v. Brown, 2016 Ark. App. 535, at 10, 506 S.W.3d 261, 268. … Kelly v. Kelly, 2011 Ark. 259, at 5–6, 381 S.W.3d 817, 822–23.

Miller v. Miller

70 Ark. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 19, 2000

See McCune v. Brown, 8 Ark. App. 51 , 648 S.W.2d 811 (1983). The chancery court in this case was not wholly incompetent to hear the tort claim. … See Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Prod. Co., 320 Ark. 298 , 896 S.W.2d 867 (1995); State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 48 Ark. App. 136 , 892 S.W.2d 519 (1995).