Case law

Pacheco v. Director, Employment Security Department & Community Action Program for Central Arkansas

92 Ark. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 29, 2005

Fulgham v. Director, 52 Ark. App. 197 , 918 S.W.2d 186 (1996). … Johnson v. Director, supra (citing Snyder v. Director, 81 Ark. App. 262, 263 , 101 S.W.3d 270, 271 (2003)).

Carl Stewart, Jr. v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

2023 Ark. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 3, 2023

We do not conduct de novo review in appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, 618 S.W.3d 446. … In Carman v. Director, 2023 Ark.

City of Benton v. Powers

269 Ark. 853 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1980

In Chalmers & Son v. … City of Harrison v. Boone County, 238 Ark. 113 , 378 S.W. 2d 665 (1964); Day v. City of Malvern, 195 Ark. 804 , 114 S.W. 2d 459 (1938); Forrest City v. Orgill, 87 Ark. 389 , 112 S.W. 891 (1908). In L. C. Eddy, Inc. v.

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Mississippi County, Inc. v. Kalyan

450 S.W.3d 681 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 10, 2014

See, e.g., Coleman v. Utley, 153 Ark. 233, 240 S.W. 10 (1922). Dr. … He cites Willis v.

Minor Child v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2025

State v. Brown, 2010 Ark. 483. In Peugh v. State, 2025 Ark. … In McBride v. State, 99 Ark.

Johnson v. Director of Labor

10 Ark. App. 24 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1983

Res judicata applies to the decisions of boards and commissions as well as courts. Wells v. Ark. Public Service Comm’n, 272 Ark. 481 , 616 S.W.2d 718 (1981); Mohawk Tire & Rubber Co. v. … In Smith v.

Coatney v. Coatney

2010 Ark. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 17, 2010

v. … Brown, supra. This exception originated with the supreme court’s decision in Layman v.

Joyce Asberry v. Little Rock School District

2025 Ark. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2025

Baker v. Dir., 2017 Ark. App. 593, 534 S.W.3d 742. … See, e.g., Doe v. Baum, 348 Ark. 259, 72 S.W.3d 476 (2002); E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. Harris, 347 Ark. 132, 60 S.W.3d 436 (2001); Barker v. Clark, 343 Ark. 8, 33 S.W.3d 476 (2000); Overton, supra.

Swan v. Stiles

16 Ark. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 25, 1985

Leardis Smith v. Everett, 276 Ark. 430 , 637 S.W.2d 537 (1982); Farmer v. Everett, 8 Ark. App. 23 , 648 S.W.2d 513 (1983). … In addressing that issue, this Court, in Farmer v.

National Baptist Convention U.S.A., Inc. v. Arkansas Employment Security Division

3 Ark. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1981

Mears, County Judge v. Arkansas State Hospital, 265 Ark. 844 , 581 S.W. 2d 339 (1979). … Weston v. State, 258 Ark. 707 , 528 S.W. 2d 412 (1975). The Board of Review, in denying appellant an exemption under Ark. Stat.

Crawford v. Lee County School District

64 Ark. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 11, 1998

Pugh v. Griggs, 327 Ark. 577 , 940 S.W.2d 445 (1997). … In City of Damascus v.

Wills v. Wills

2016 Ark. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 16, 2016

Brown v. Brown, 2012 Ark. 89, at 6–7, 387 S.W.3d 159, 163. We will not reverse the circuit court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., 387 S.W.3d at 163. … HOOFMAN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Osborne Law Firm, by: Ken Osborne, for appellant. Law Offices of Steven H. Kay and Associates, by: Steven H.

Wood v. West Tree Service

70 Ark. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 12, 2000

Brown v. Alabama Electric Co., 60 Ark. App. 138 , 959 S.W.2d 753 (1998); Weaver v. Whitaker Furniture Co., Inc., 55 Ark. App. 400 , 935 S.W.2d 584 (1996). This court has addressed Ark. … In both Brown, supra, and Graham v. Turnage Employment Group, 60 Ark.

Pritchett v. Director of Labor

5 Ark. App. 194 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1982

Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S. W.2d 954 (1978). The board, however, made another finding which we do not affirm. … Whitford v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 222 , 563 S.W.2d 469 (1978); Paulino v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 676 , 599 S.W.2d 760 (Ark. App. 1980).

Tyrone Lever v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2025

See Brown v. … Scaggs v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 142, 596 S.W.3d 562. Moreover, matters such as evaluating a witness’s credibility and resolving inconsistencies in the evidence are issues for the jury and not the court. Brown v.

Little Rock School District v. Ovid Lamb

2025 Ark. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2025

Worsham v. Bassett, 2016 Ark. 146, 489 S.W.3d 162. … Arkansas precedent is clear regarding a school board’s broad authority to determine its policies. See Bentonville Sch. Dist. v. Sitton, 2022 Ark. 80, at 12–13, 643 S.W.3d 763[, 772].

Stroud v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 29, 2014

OF REVIEW V. … We review the decision of the Appeal tribunal as the Board’s decision pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-525, and reverse and remand because the Board’s decision and this appeal are premature.

Carl Stewart, Jr. v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

2023 Ark. App. 248 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 3, 2023

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2021-BR-04863] V. … We do not conduct de novo reviews in appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, 618 S.W.3d 446.

Jones v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2014

Rivas v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 91, at 1–2 (citing Baldor Elec. v. Dir., 71 Ark. App. 166, 168–69, 27 S.W.3d 771, 773 (2000)). … We review the Board’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision, and credibility calls are for the finder of fact. Patterson v. Dir., 2014 Ark. App. 113, at 5.

Dobbins v. Everett

2 Ark. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 2, 1981

Claimant, Graham Dobbins, appeals the decision of the Board of Review of the Employment Security Division denying him unemployment benefits. The Board of Review found that Mr. … See also, Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. v. Appeal Board, 325 A. 2d 374 (Super. Ct. Del. 1974). In the instant case, the claimant took the less severe, embarrassing and traumatic option of resignation rather than discharge.