Case law

McGough v. Pine Bluff School District

79 Ark. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2002

Bond v. Lavaca Sch. Dist., 347 Ark. 300 , 64 S.W.3d 249 (2001). … McCutchen v. Patton, 340 Ark. 371 , 10 S.W.3d 439 (2000). The question in the case at bar is one of law. The basic rule of statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the General Assembly. Turnbough v.

Barnard v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

What constitutes good cause is ordinarily a question of fact for the Board to determine from the particular circumstances of each case. Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. … On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ramirez v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 453, at 2.

Barnard v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

What constitutes good cause is ordinarily a question of fact for the Board to determine from the particular circumstances of each case. Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. … On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ramirez v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 453, at 2.

T.S. v. State

534 S.W.3d 160 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 1, 2017

Pursuant to Anders v. … T.D. v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 486 , at 2, 2011 WL 3849485 (citing C.H. v. State, 51 Ark. App. 153 , 912 S.W.2d 942 (1995)).

Dickerson v. State

24 Ark. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 30, 1988

Except for the case of State v. Brown, supra, the only authority cited by appellant is a case note in 38 Ark. L. Rev. 688 (1985), discussing the State v. Brown case. That note cites People v. … Also, in the case of Southern v.

Barnes v. Barnes

2010 Ark. App. 821 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2010

Lofton v. Lofton, 23 Ark. App. 203 , 745 S.W.2d 635 (1988). Bill cites McKay v. McKay, 340 Ark. 171 , 8 S.W.3d 525 (2000) and Cole v. Cole, 53 Ark. … In support of this argument, she cites Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333 , 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008), and Farrell, supra.

Lawrence v. Everett

9 Ark. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1983

This is an appeal of an overpayment determination by the Board of Review. … Reddick v. Scott, 217 Ark. 38 , 228 S.W.2d 1008 (1950). Hays v. Batesville Mfg. Co., 251 Ark. 659 , 473 S.W.2d 926 (1971). Remanded.

Harper v. State

2016 Ark. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 22, 2016

Pursuant to Anders v. … Constance Brown, appellant’s probation officer, testified that Mr. Harper had failed to report as directed on multiple occasions. Ms. Brown stated that Mr.

Wilson v. Wilson

431 S.W.3d 369 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 18, 2013

TEMCO Const., LLC v. Gann, 2013 Ark. 202, ___ S.W.3d ___; Smith v. Thomas, 373 Ark. 427, 284 S.W.3d 476 (2008). … WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree. Mary Thomason, for appellant. Harrell, Lindsey & Carr, P.A., by: Christina S. Carr, for appellees. 9

St. Vincent Infirmary v. Arkansas Employment Security Division

271 Ark. 654 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1980

The case at bar is distinguished from Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra. … In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra, we affirmed because in that particular case we found substantial evidence to support the result reached by the Board of Review.

Dare v. Frost Dissent final

2017 Ark. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 13, 2017

Huey v. Huey, 90 Ark. App. 98, 204 S.W.3d 92 (2005). The definition of income under the guidelines is broadly construed. White v. White, 95 Ark. App. 274, 282, 236 S.W.3d 540, 546 (2006). … Brown v. Brown, 76 Ark. App. 494, 68 S.W.3d 316 (2002); Stepp v. Gray, 58 Ark. App. 229, 947 S.W.2d 798 (1997). One-time income such as an inheritance or the cashing in of a certificate of deposit can be income.

Tate v. Laboratory Corp. of American Holdings

102 Ark. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 28, 2008

Morrow Cash Heating & Air, Inc. v. Jackson, 96 Ark. App. 105 , 239 S.W.3d 8 (2006) (citing Ragar v. Brown, 332 Ark. 214 , 964 S.W.2d 372 (1998)). However, appellant urges this court to follow the analysis in State v. … v.

Meeks v. State

55 Ark. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 11, 1996

Danzie v. State, 326 Ark. 34 , 930 S.W.2d 310 (1996). … See Jordan v. State, 323 Ark. 628 , 917 S.W.2d 164 (1996); McVay v. State, 312 Ark. 73 , 847 S.W.2d 28 (1993); Yedrysek v. State, 293 Ark. 541 , 739 S.W.2d 672 (1987).

Kupers v. Kupers

20 Ark. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1987

For his second point for reversal, the appellant argues that the jurisdiction of the chancery court terminated upon Julia Kupers’ death, relying on Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 , 238 S.W.2d 482 (1951). … Brown, however, involved a matter of custody. The situation in the case at bar is more similar to that found in McLaughlin v. Todd, Guardian, 201 Ark. 348 , 145 S.W.2d 725 (1940).

Matthew Webster v. Andrea Webster

689 S.W.3d 133 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 15, 2024

Brown v. Towell, 2021 Ark. 60, at 6, 619 S.W.3d 17, 20. The standard of review for the grant of a motion to dismiss is whether the circuit court abused its discretion. Dockery v. … Id.; see also Robertson v. Daniel, 2013 Ark. App. 160. In the Rule 12(b)(6) context, we treat only the facts alleged in the complaint as true but not a plaintiff’s theories or speculation. Brown, supra.

Stephney v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2013

Maxfield v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 84 Ark. App. 48, 129 S.W.3d 298 (2003). We will affirm a decision of the Board of Review if  Cite as 2013 Ark. … App. 554 it is supported by substantial evidence, and our review is limited to whether the Board could reasonably reach its decision based on the evidence before it. Peterson v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 90 Ark.

Stephney v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2013

Maxfield v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 84 Ark. App. 48, 129 S.W.3d 298 (2003). We will affirm a decision of the Board of Review if  Cite as 2013 Ark. … App. 554 it is supported by substantial evidence, and our review is limited to whether the Board could reasonably reach its decision based on the evidence before it. Peterson v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 90 Ark.

Arkansas State Bd. of Cosmetology v. Roberts

28 Ark. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 28, 1989

App. 111 , 680 S.W.2d 718 (1984); Green v. Carder, 282 Ark. 239 , 667 S.W.2d 660 (1984). In Garner v. Foundation Life Insurance Co. of Arkansas, 17 Ark. … This was the holding of the Arkansas Supreme Court in Baxter v. Dental Examiners Board, 269 Ark. 67 , 598 S.W.2d 412 (1980) and in Arkansas Board of Pharmacy v. Patrick, 243 Ark. 967 , 423 S.W.2d 265 (1968).

Pine Bluff Warehouse v. Berry

51 Ark. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1995

Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993). … Crockett & Brown, P.A., v. Wilson, supra; Fisher v. Jones, 311 Ark. 450 , 844 S.W.2d 954 (1993).

Oliver v. DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT.

80 Ark. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 2002

Kimble v. Director, Ark. Empl. Sec. Dep't, 60 Ark. App. 36 , 959 S.W.2d 66 (1997). … Corp. v. Daniels, Dir., 1 Ark.App. 6 , 611 S.W.2d 794 (1981), or excessive due to other personal activities, see Jeffreys v. Everett, Dir., 6 Ark.App. 265 , 640 S.W.2d 465 (1982).