Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkctapp

5,193 results

1.48s

  • Steak House v. Weigel

    101 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 19, 2007

    Bryant v. Staffmark, Inc., 76 Ark. App. 64, 69 , 61 S.W.3d 856, 860 (2001). And we see no abuse of discretion in the admission of this report before the second hearing. Brown v. Alabama Elec. Co., 60 Ark. … Williams v. Brown’s Sheet Metal/CNA Ins. Co., 81 Ark. App. 459, 462 , 105 S.W.3d 382, 384 (2003). IV.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. Everett

    9 Ark. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1983

    This is an appeal of an overpayment determination by the Board of Review. … Reddick v. Scott, 217 Ark. 38 , 228 S.W.2d 1008 (1950). Hays v. Batesville Mfg. Co., 251 Ark. 659 , 473 S.W.2d 926 (1971). Remanded.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Boothe v. Director, Employment Security Department

    59 Ark. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 12, 1997

    When the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence, we will reverse. Sadler v. Stiles, 22 Ark. App. 117 , 735 S.W.2d 708 (1987). … Teel v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 766 , 606 S.W.2d 151 (Ark. App. 1980).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • St. Vincent Infirmary v. Arkansas Employment Security Division

    271 Ark. 654 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1980

    The case at bar is distinguished from Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra. … In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra, we affirmed because in that particular case we found substantial evidence to support the result reached by the Board of Review.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Angela Styles v. James Styles

    703 S.W.3d 484 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 20, 2024

    In Styles v. Styles, 2024 Ark. … Bowles v. Taylor, 2024 Ark. App. 299, 689 S.W.3d 447. The trial court abuses its discretion when it acts thoughtlessly, improvidently, or without due consideration. Nicholas v. Jones, 2022 Ark.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • L.C. Kennedy, Jr. v. State of Arkansas

    635 S.W.3d 524 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 27, 2021

    Yarberry v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 265. … Id.; see also Harness v. State, 352 Ark. 335, 101 S.W.3d 235 (2003). 9 Affirmed as modified. WHITEAKER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • White v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

    54 Ark. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1996

    George’s Inc. v. Director, 50 Ark. App. 77 , 900 S.W.2d 590 (1995). … The Board rejected that evidence.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • T.S. v. State

    534 S.W.3d 160 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 1, 2017

    Pursuant to Anders v. … T.D. v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 486 , at 2, 2011 WL 3849485 (citing C.H. v. State, 51 Ark. App. 153 , 912 S.W.2d 942 (1995)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. Daniels

    269 Ark. 693 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1980

    Arkansas Section 5(b)(1), qualifying employees from unemployment benefits who have been discharged for misconduct, the Courts follow the definition of misconduct as construed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Boynton Cab Co. v. … The only question before this court on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the Board of Review. Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W. 2d 954 (1978).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. City of Prairie Grove

    43 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 8, 1993

    Wheeler v. City of Arkadelphia, 254 Ark. 533 , 495 S.W.2d 862 (1973). … Wheeler, supra; Brown v. Curtis, 254 Ark. 162 , 492 S.W.2d 235 (1973).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Gaddy

    48 Ark. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1995

    On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529 (c)(1) (1987); Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. … Shipley Baking Co. v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 72 , 703 S.W.2d 465 (1986).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kupers v. Kupers

    20 Ark. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1987

    For his second point for reversal, the appellant argues that the jurisdiction of the chancery court terminated upon Julia Kupers’ death, relying on Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 , 238 S.W.2d 482 (1951). … Brown, however, involved a matter of custody. The situation in the case at bar is more similar to that found in McLaughlin v. Todd, Guardian, 201 Ark. 348 , 145 S.W.2d 725 (1940).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Junction City School District v. Alphin

    56 Ark. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1997

    Helena-West Helena School District v. Davis, 40 Ark. App. 161 , 842 S.W.2d 873 (1992); Murray v. Altheimer-Sherril Public Schools, 294 Ark. 403 , 743 S.W. 2d 403 (1988) (decision under prior law). … Sosebee v. County Line Sch. Dist., 320 Ark. 412 , 897 S.W.2d 556 (1995); City of Ft. Smith v. Driggers, 305 Ark. 409 , 808 S.W.2d 748 (1991).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Harper v. State

    2016 Ark. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 22, 2016

    Pursuant to Anders v. … Constance Brown, appellant’s probation officer, testified that Mr. Harper had failed to report as directed on multiple occasions. Ms. Brown stated that Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. State

    14 Ark. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1985

    Stubblefield, Burns & Gaston v. State, 201 Ark. 611 , 146 S.W.2d 688 (1941). … Kelley v. State, 7 Ark. App. 130 , 644 S.W.2d 638 (1983); Mooring v. State, 11 Ark. App. 119 , 666 S.W.2d 720 (1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blackford v. Arkansas Employment Security Department

    55 Ark. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1996

    Sadler v. Stiles, 22 Ark. App. 117 , 735 S.W.2d 708 (1987). As we stated in A. Tennenbaum Co. v. Director, 32 Ark. … Vincent Infirmary v. Ark. Emp. Sec.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dare v. Frost Dissent final

    2017 Ark. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 13, 2017

    Huey v. Huey, 90 Ark. App. 98, 204 S.W.3d 92 (2005). The definition of income under the guidelines is broadly construed. White v. White, 95 Ark. App. 274, 282, 236 S.W.3d 540, 546 (2006). … Brown v. Brown, 76 Ark. App. 494, 68 S.W.3d 316 (2002); Stepp v. Gray, 58 Ark. App. 229, 947 S.W.2d 798 (1997). One-time income such as an inheritance or the cashing in of a certificate of deposit can be income.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lakeside School v. Harrington

    8 Ark. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 11, 1983

    In Hodges v. Everett, 2 Ark. … This Court is required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the decision reached by the Board, and to affirm the decision of the Board if it is supported by substantial evidence. Harris v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Wilson

    431 S.W.3d 369 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 18, 2013

    TEMCO Const., LLC v. Gann, 2013 Ark. 202, ___ S.W.3d ___; Smith v. Thomas, 373 Ark. 427, 284 S.W.3d 476 (2008). … WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree. Mary Thomason, for appellant. Harrell, Lindsey & Carr, P.A., by: Christina S. Carr, for appellees. 9

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. State

    2012 Ark. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 12, 2012

    Brown v. … Hudson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.