Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,193 results
1.48s
101 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 19, 2007
Bryant v. Staffmark, Inc., 76 Ark. App. 64, 69 , 61 S.W.3d 856, 860 (2001). And we see no abuse of discretion in the admission of this report before the second hearing. Brown v. Alabama Elec. Co., 60 Ark. … Williams v. Brown’s Sheet Metal/CNA Ins. Co., 81 Ark. App. 459, 462 , 105 S.W.3d 382, 384 (2003). IV.
Cited 3 timesPublished9 Ark. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1983
This is an appeal of an overpayment determination by the Board of Review. … Reddick v. Scott, 217 Ark. 38 , 228 S.W.2d 1008 (1950). Hays v. Batesville Mfg. Co., 251 Ark. 659 , 473 S.W.2d 926 (1971). Remanded.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoothe v. Director, Employment Security Department
59 Ark. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 12, 1997
When the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence, we will reverse. Sadler v. Stiles, 22 Ark. App. 117 , 735 S.W.2d 708 (1987). … Teel v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 766 , 606 S.W.2d 151 (Ark. App. 1980).
Cited 10 timesPublishedSt. Vincent Infirmary v. Arkansas Employment Security Division
271 Ark. 654 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1980
The case at bar is distinguished from Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra. … In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, supra, we affirmed because in that particular case we found substantial evidence to support the result reached by the Board of Review.
Cited 8 timesPublished703 S.W.3d 484 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 20, 2024
In Styles v. Styles, 2024 Ark. … Bowles v. Taylor, 2024 Ark. App. 299, 689 S.W.3d 447. The trial court abuses its discretion when it acts thoughtlessly, improvidently, or without due consideration. Nicholas v. Jones, 2022 Ark.
Cited 1 timesPublishedL.C. Kennedy, Jr. v. State of Arkansas
635 S.W.3d 524 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 27, 2021
Yarberry v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 265. … Id.; see also Harness v. State, 352 Ark. 335, 101 S.W.3d 235 (2003). 9 Affirmed as modified. WHITEAKER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWhite v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department
54 Ark. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1996
George’s Inc. v. Director, 50 Ark. App. 77 , 900 S.W.2d 590 (1995). … The Board rejected that evidence.
Cited 2 timesPublished534 S.W.3d 160 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 1, 2017
Pursuant to Anders v. … T.D. v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 486 , at 2, 2011 WL 3849485 (citing C.H. v. State, 51 Ark. App. 153 , 912 S.W.2d 942 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedB. J. McAdams, Inc. v. Daniels
269 Ark. 693 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1980
Arkansas Section 5(b)(1), qualifying employees from unemployment benefits who have been discharged for misconduct, the Courts follow the definition of misconduct as construed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Boynton Cab Co. v. … The only question before this court on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the Board of Review. Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W. 2d 954 (1978).
Cited 6 timesPublishedHawkins v. City of Prairie Grove
43 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 8, 1993
Wheeler v. City of Arkadelphia, 254 Ark. 533 , 495 S.W.2d 862 (1973). … Wheeler, supra; Brown v. Curtis, 254 Ark. 162 , 492 S.W.2d 235 (1973).
Cited 1 timesPublished48 Ark. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1995
On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529 (c)(1) (1987); Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. … Shipley Baking Co. v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 72 , 703 S.W.2d 465 (1986).
Cited 8 timesPublished20 Ark. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1987
For his second point for reversal, the appellant argues that the jurisdiction of the chancery court terminated upon Julia Kupers’ death, relying on Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 , 238 S.W.2d 482 (1951). … Brown, however, involved a matter of custody. The situation in the case at bar is more similar to that found in McLaughlin v. Todd, Guardian, 201 Ark. 348 , 145 S.W.2d 725 (1940).
Cited 1 timesPublishedJunction City School District v. Alphin
56 Ark. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1997
Helena-West Helena School District v. Davis, 40 Ark. App. 161 , 842 S.W.2d 873 (1992); Murray v. Altheimer-Sherril Public Schools, 294 Ark. 403 , 743 S.W. 2d 403 (1988) (decision under prior law). … Sosebee v. County Line Sch. Dist., 320 Ark. 412 , 897 S.W.2d 556 (1995); City of Ft. Smith v. Driggers, 305 Ark. 409 , 808 S.W.2d 748 (1991).
Cited 5 timesPublished2016 Ark. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 22, 2016
Pursuant to Anders v. … Constance Brown, appellant’s probation officer, testified that Mr. Harper had failed to report as directed on multiple occasions. Ms. Brown stated that Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublished14 Ark. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1985
Stubblefield, Burns & Gaston v. State, 201 Ark. 611 , 146 S.W.2d 688 (1941). … Kelley v. State, 7 Ark. App. 130 , 644 S.W.2d 638 (1983); Mooring v. State, 11 Ark. App. 119 , 666 S.W.2d 720 (1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBlackford v. Arkansas Employment Security Department
55 Ark. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1996
Sadler v. Stiles, 22 Ark. App. 117 , 735 S.W.2d 708 (1987). As we stated in A. Tennenbaum Co. v. Director, 32 Ark. … Vincent Infirmary v. Ark. Emp. Sec.
Cited 5 timesPublished2017 Ark. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 13, 2017
Huey v. Huey, 90 Ark. App. 98, 204 S.W.3d 92 (2005). The definition of income under the guidelines is broadly construed. White v. White, 95 Ark. App. 274, 282, 236 S.W.3d 540, 546 (2006). … Brown v. Brown, 76 Ark. App. 494, 68 S.W.3d 316 (2002); Stepp v. Gray, 58 Ark. App. 229, 947 S.W.2d 798 (1997). One-time income such as an inheritance or the cashing in of a certificate of deposit can be income.
Cited 1 timesPublished8 Ark. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 11, 1983
In Hodges v. Everett, 2 Ark. … This Court is required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the decision reached by the Board, and to affirm the decision of the Board if it is supported by substantial evidence. Harris v.
Cited 1 timesPublished431 S.W.3d 369 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 18, 2013
TEMCO Const., LLC v. Gann, 2013 Ark. 202, ___ S.W.3d ___; Smith v. Thomas, 373 Ark. 427, 284 S.W.3d 476 (2008). … WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree. Mary Thomason, for appellant. Harrell, Lindsey & Carr, P.A., by: Christina S. Carr, for appellees. 9
Cited 5 timesPublished2012 Ark. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 12, 2012
Brown v. … Hudson v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna