Case law

SSI, INC. v. Cates

2009 Ark. App. 763 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 11, 2009

BROWN, Judge. Ii SSI, Inc. and its insurer, Bituminous Insurance Company, appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding appellee George W. Cates additional medical benefits. … Gansky v. Hi-Tech Engineering, 325 Ark. 163 , 924 S.W.2d 790 (1996).

Cooper v. State

2015 Ark. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 27, 2015

Her v. State, 2015 Ark. 91, ___ S.W.3d ___. … Leal v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 673.

Weaver v. Director, Employment Security Department

82 Ark. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2003

Weaver argues that the finding of the Board of Review upon which it disqualified her from receiving unemployment benefits was unsupported by substantial evidence. We agree. In Dingmann v. … See Rankin v. Director, 78 Ark.

Little Rock School District v. Judith Hart

2025 Ark. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 5, 2025

Arkansas precedent is clear regarding a school board’s broad authority to determine its policies. See Bentonville Sch. Dist. v. Sitton, 2022 Ark. 80, at 12–13, 643 S.W.3d 763[, 772]. … LRSD argues that absent a finding that the LRSD Community Advisory Board (the Board) abused its discretion, the circuit court could not override the Board. Again, this argument was not raised below.

Tipton v. Aaron

87 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 16, 2004

Newman v. State, 353 Ark. 258 , 106 S.W.3d 438 (2003). Further, a factfinder may not consider evidence that serves no apparent purpose and that is used only to inflame a jury’s passion. Upton v. … It seems ironic that, as we celebrate the fifty-year anniversary of Brown v.

Patterson v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 12, 2014

Magee v. Dir., 75 Ark. App. 115, 55 S.W.3d 321 (2001). We review the Board’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision, and credibility calls are for the finder of fact. Id. … App. 74; Bergman v. Dir., 2009 Ark. App. 724; Magee v. Dir., 75 Ark. App. 115, 55 S.W.3d 321 (2001).

Fennell v. City of Pine Bluff

492 S.W.3d 887 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 18, 2016

Instead, she alleged that Brown had told her that he would promote her if he was promoted. However, it is undisputed that Brown resigned from his position. … Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc’y v. Kolesar, 2014 Ark. 279; Patel v. Patel, 2015 Ark.

Lewis v. Director, Employment Security Department

84 Ark. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 21, 2004

We will affirm the Board’s decision on a question of fact if it is supported by substantial evidence. Magee v. Director, 80 Ark. App. 162 , 92 S.W.3d 703 (2002). … Garrett v. Director, 58 Ark. App. 7 , 944 S.W.2d 865 (1997).

Jenkins v. Dale E. & Betty Fogerty Joint Revocable Trust

2011 Ark. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2011

See Rice v. Welch Motor Co., 95 Ark.App. 100 , 234 S.W.3d 327 (2006); Killian v. Hill, 32 Ark.App. 25 , 795 S.W.2d 369 (1990); see also Ward v. … GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., dissent in part.

Stepherson v. Director, Employment Security Department

49 Ark. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1995

American Transportation Corp. v. Director, 39 Ark. App. 104 , 840 S.W.2d 198 (1992). … See Morris v. Everett, Director, 7 Ark. App. 243 , 647 S.W.2d 476 (1983). Appellant testified that a majority of the drivers worked 40 hours a week driving one of her trucks for Fikes.

Terravista Landscape v. Director, Employment Security Department

88 Ark. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 6, 2004

In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 795 , 601 S.W.2d 890 (Ark. … On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Greenberg v. Director, 53 Ark. App. 295 , 922 S.W.2d 5 (1996).

Stacy Bridges v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2023 Ark. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 1, 2023

OF REVIEW V. … Code Ann. § 11-10-524(a)(1) (Supp. 2023). 2 See Paulino v.

Let's Talk Speech Pathology Services, LLC v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

486 S.W.3d 800 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 16, 2016

OF REVIEW APPELLANT [NO. 2014-BR-8 EC] V. … We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Rodriguez v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 361.

Cowan v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department & Forsgren, Inc.

56 Ark. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1997

. § 11-10-529 (c)(1) (Repl. 1996); Perdix- Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. App. 218 , 856 S.W.2d 636 (1993). … See McEwen v. Everett, Director, 6 Ark. App. 32 , 637 S.W.2d 617 (1982); Teel v. Daniels, Director, 270 Ark. 766 , 606 S.W.2d 151 (Ark. App. 1980).

Jacobs v. Collison

505 S.W.3d 254 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 16, 2016

Davis v. Brown, 2011 Ark. App. 789. … Gray v. White River Health Sys., Inc., 2016 Ark. 73, 483 S.W.3d 293; Kyle v. Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C., 2012 Ark. 268. Appeal dismissed. HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Bennett v. Daniels

1 Ark. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1981

Verser decided that his wife might do better if she worked part-time for the Medical Board. Mrs. … Zinmon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 8 Pa. Commw. Ct. 649, 305 A. 2d 380 (1973) and Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors, Fla. App., 334 S. 2d 67 (1976).

Ora Stevens v. Renita Danley

2026 Ark. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 21, 2026

Brown v. Towell, 2021 Ark. 60, at 6, 619 S.W.3d 17, 20. In Arkansas, an employer may terminate an employee for good cause, bad cause, or no reason at all under the employment-at-will doctrine. Hice v. … But see Smith v. Am.

Soto v. State

2013 Ark. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 30, 2013

App. 619 Pursuant to Anders v. … Denson v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 105. The State need only show that the defendant committed one violation to sustain a revocation. Maxwell v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 822.

Womack v. Womack

16 Ark. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1985

Appellee relies on Paulsen v. … Paulsen v. Paulsen, 269 Ark. 523 , 601 S.W.2d 873 (1980). That view was changed in Day v. Day, 281 Ark. 261 , 663 S.W.2d 719 (1984) .... In Marshall v.

Pleasant v. McDaniel

550 S.W.3d 8 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 18, 2018

It is clear that procurers are not regulated by the Board, and appellants have not demonstrated that their deceptive conduct is authorized by the Board. … Victory v. Smith , 2012 Ark. App. 168 , 392 S.W.3d 892 .