Case law

Kwasi Andrade McKinney v. State of Arkansas

2019 Ark. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 28, 2019

Brown v. State, 2012 Ark. 399, at 4, 424 S.W.3d 288, 291 (citing Ark. Code Jud. Conduct R. 2.2 & 2.3(A) (2012)). … Brown, 2012 Ark. 399, at 5, 424 S.W.3d at 292; see also Beshears v.

Stanley v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

507 S.W.3d 544 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2016

BROWN, Judge Appellants appeal from the circuit court’s termination of their parental rights to T.S., born 3/4/2005, and C.S., born 9/5/2006.1 On appeal, both appellants argue that there was insufficient evidence … It found therein that the children had been subjected to 3 Services provided during the course of the 2013 case included worker visits, random drug screens, foster home, board payments, clothing vouchers

City of Fort Smith v. Moore

269 Ark. 617 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 14, 1980

Appellant cites Rainfiar, Inc. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938); Ayers v. E. F. Johnson Co., 70 N.W. 2d 296 (1955).

Matthew Oseng v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2026 Ark. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 1, 2026

V. … If adequate findings of fact are not made on the issue presented, we remand to the Board for it to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law for us to properly review the case. Rush v. Dir., 2023 Ark.

SSI, INC. v. Cates

2009 Ark. App. 763 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 11, 2009

BROWN, Judge. Ii SSI, Inc. and its insurer, Bituminous Insurance Company, appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding appellee George W. Cates additional medical benefits. … Gansky v. Hi-Tech Engineering, 325 Ark. 163 , 924 S.W.2d 790 (1996).

Mathis v. State

2009 Ark. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 11, 2009

State, 55 Ark.App. 148 , 934 S.W.2d 927 (1996); Brown v. State, 35 Ark.App. 156 , 814 S.W.2d 918 (1991). … Consider Brown . The police approached Brown around 9:30 one morning because he matched the description of a suspect. Brown abandoned the shopping cart he was pushing and fled, but was soon caught.

WEISENFELS v. State

102 Ark. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2008

Citing Middleton v. State, 29 Ark. … Brown v. State, 38 Ark. App. 18 , 827 S.W.2d 174 (1992).

Trigg v. Director

72 Ark. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 20, 2000

On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Hunt v. Director, 57 Ark. App. 152 , 942 S.W.2d 873 (1997). … In Pritchett v. Director of Labor, 5 Ark.

Buchanan v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

91 Ark. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 27, 2005

We affirm the decision of the Board of Review if it is supported by substantial evidence. Billings v. Director, 84 Ark. App. 79 , 133 S.W.3d 399 (2003). … Corp. v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 20 , 702 S.W.2d 421 (1986).

Berry ex rel. Dillard's, Inc. v. Dillard

2011 Ark. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 30, 2011

In Kamen v. … In White v.

Robert Penny v. State of Arkansas

2021 Ark. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 27, 2021

Brown v. State, 326 Ark. 56, 60, 931 S.W.2d 80, 83 (1996). Further, we will not address arguments raised for the first time on appeal. Id., 931 S.W.2d 2 at 83. … See McKinney v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 10, 538 S.W.3d 216. Therefore, we hold that Penny’s sentencing argument is not preserved for appeal. Brown, 326 Ark. at 60, 931 S.W.2d at 83; Mixon v.

Jones v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.1

2014 Ark. App. 717 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 17, 2014

Jones testified that she was currently living with her best friend, Kimberly Brown, and Brown’s mother; prior to that, she had lived with her father’s girlfriend. … Jones said that Brown’s children had been removed from her custody by DHS due to Brown’s continued use of methamphetamine; however, Jones believed that it would be okay for A.J. to live with her at Brown’s house.

Cooper v. State

2015 Ark. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 27, 2015

Her v. State, 2015 Ark. 91, ___ S.W.3d ___. … Leal v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 673.

Weaver v. Director, Employment Security Department

82 Ark. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2003

Weaver argues that the finding of the Board of Review upon which it disqualified her from receiving unemployment benefits was unsupported by substantial evidence. We agree. In Dingmann v. … See Rankin v. Director, 78 Ark.

Little Rock School District v. Judith Hart

2025 Ark. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 5, 2025

Arkansas precedent is clear regarding a school board’s broad authority to determine its policies. See Bentonville Sch. Dist. v. Sitton, 2022 Ark. 80, at 12–13, 643 S.W.3d 763[, 772]. … LRSD argues that absent a finding that the LRSD Community Advisory Board (the Board) abused its discretion, the circuit court could not override the Board. Again, this argument was not raised below.

Emerald Development Co. v. McNeill

82 Ark. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 14, 2003

See Miller v. Jasinski, supra. Emerald relies on Milligan v. … See Brown v. SEECO, Inc., 316 Ark. 336 , 871 S.W.2d 580 (1994). The prospect of irreparable harm or lack of an otherwise adequate remedy at law is at the foundation of the power to issue injunctive relief.

Jennifer Hernandez v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 10, 2021

OF REVIEW V. … On December 3, 2020, the Tribunal conducted a hearing pursuant to Paulino v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 676, 559 S.W.2d 760 (Ark.

Jenkins v. Dale E. & Betty Fogerty Joint Revocable Trust

2011 Ark. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2011

See Rice v. Welch Motor Co., 95 Ark.App. 100 , 234 S.W.3d 327 (2006); Killian v. Hill, 32 Ark.App. 25 , 795 S.W.2d 369 (1990); see also Ward v. … GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., dissent in part.

Tipton v. Aaron

87 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 16, 2004

Newman v. State, 353 Ark. 258 , 106 S.W.3d 438 (2003). Further, a factfinder may not consider evidence that serves no apparent purpose and that is used only to inflame a jury’s passion. Upton v. … It seems ironic that, as we celebrate the fifty-year anniversary of Brown v.

Fennell v. City of Pine Bluff

492 S.W.3d 887 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 18, 2016

Instead, she alleged that Brown had told her that he would promote her if he was promoted. However, it is undisputed that Brown resigned from his position. … Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc’y v. Kolesar, 2014 Ark. 279; Patel v. Patel, 2015 Ark.