Case law

Victoria Allen, Tina Pankey, and Donald Long v. Jesse Allen

2021 Ark. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 26, 2021

The sole Arkansas case analyzing sections 9-10-201 and 9-10-202 is Brown v. Brown, 83 Ark. App. 217, 125 S.W.3d 840 (2003). … Brown, supra.

West v. Director

94 Ark. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2006

Nibco, Inc. v. Metcalf, 1 Ark. App. 114 , 613 S.W.2d 612 (1981). … Brooks v. Director, 62 Ark. App. 85 , 966 S.W.2d 941 (1998).

(In Re Estate of Reinkoester, Deceased) James Bennett Reinkoester v. Stephanie Reinkoester

2023 Ark. App. 517 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 8, 2023

Hargett v. Hargett, 226 Ark. 929, 932, 295 S.W.2d 307, 309 (1956); see also Blair v. Bradley, 238 Ark. 191, 379 S.W.2d 5 (1964). … Holliman v. Johnson, 2016 Ark. App. 39, at 8, 480 S.W.3d 903, 908. Accordingly, we affirm. Affirmed. MURPHY and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Harris v. City of Fort Smith

86 Ark. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 14, 2004

Accord Arkansas Gazette Co. v. Pickens, 258 Ark. 69 , 522 S.W.2d 350 (1975). … In Rehab Hospital Services Corp. v.

Jori Enterprises, LLC v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

474 S.W.3d 910 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 4, 2015

OF REVIEW V. … Also, the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony are matters to be resolved by the Board. Johnson v. Dir., 84 Ark.

Adams v. State

26 Ark. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1988

In Baxter v. … See Terry v. Ohio, supra.

Hamby v. Everett

4 Ark. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1982

The Board of Review made the following finding regarding appellant’s misconduct: The Board of Review finds that the claimant was discharged for misconduct in connection with the work. … . § 81-1107 (d); Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W. 2d 954 (1978); Stagecoach Motel v. Krause, 267 Ark. 1093 , 593 S.W. 2d 495 (1980). In Stagecoach Motel v.

Garrett v. Director, Employment Security Department

58 Ark. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1997

Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. App. 218 , 856 S.W.2d 636 (1993). … We do not conduct a de novo review of the evidence in an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review. Cowan v. Director, 56 Ark. App. 17 , 936 S.W.2d 766 (1997).

Richards v. Daniels

1 Ark. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 13, 1981

In Parker v. … Barton & Company v.

Olsen v. East End School District

84 Ark. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 28, 2004

Kelly v. Kelly, 341 Ark. 596 , 19 S.W.3d 1 (2000). … See, e.g., Doe v. Baum, 348 Ark. 259 , 72 S.W.3d 476 (2002); E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. Harris, 347 Ark. 132 , 60 S.W.3d 436 (2001); Barker v. Clark, 343 Ark. 8 , 33 S.W.3d 476 (2000).

Watkins v. Dudgeon

270 Ark. 516 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1980

Brown v. Brown, 233 Ark. 422 , 345 S.W. 2d 27 (1961); McCall v. McCall, 205 Ark. 1123 , 172 S.W. 2d 677 (1943). This he failed to do, and Ark. Star. Ann. § 56-207 applies. … Pender v. McKee, supra; Brown v. Fleming, 266 Ark. 814 , 586 S.W. 2d 8 (1979). Like the court below, we recognize the heavy burden which the law places upon one wishing to adopt a child against the consent of a parent.

Owens v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

55 Ark. App. 255 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 18, 1996

Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. App. 218 , 856 S.W.2d 636 (1993). Good cause has been defined as a cause that would reasonably impel the average able-bodied, qualified worker to give up his or her employment. Id. … On appeal, the findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529 (c)(l) (Repl. 1996); Feagin v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 59 , 652 S.W.2d 839 (1983).

Rainbolt v. Everett

6 Ark. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 6, 1982

In the first case, Rainbolt v. Everett, 3 Ark. … See, Ferguson v. Green, 266 Ark. 556 , 587 S.W.2d 18 (1979); Ouachita Hospital v. Marshall, 2 Ark. App. 273 , 621 S. W.2d 7 (1981). On remand, the Board was restricted to the three issues which we said remained open.

McDaniel v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

103 Ark. App. 231 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 1, 2008

We affirm the decision of the Board of Review if it is supported by substantial evidence. Coker v. Director, 99 Ark. App. 455 , 262 S.W.3d 175 (2007). … See Edwards v. Metro Title Co., 133 S.W.2d 411 (Fla. 1961). Utica Mutual Insurance Co., et al v. Pioda, 90 Ga. App. 593 , 83 S.E.2d 627 (1954). Ross, 266 Ark. at 1059 , 599 S.W.2d at 391-92 .

Sanders v. Dir.

2016 Ark. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 24, 2016

App. 115 Barnard v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 143, at 2 (quoting Valentine v. Director, 2012 Ark. App. 612, at 3). … Gunter v. Director, 82 Ark. App. 346, 107 S.W.3d 902 (2003). Here, the only issue presented is the sufficiency of the evidence.

Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div.

10 Ark. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 7, 1983

Carder v. Hemstock, 5 Ark. App. 115 , 633 S.W.2d 384 (1982). … In Syder v.

Chili's of Jonesboro, Inc. v. State Alcohol Beverage Control Division

75 Ark. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 17, 2001

. & Admin. v. Samuhel, 51 Ark. App. 76 , 909 S.W.2d 656 (1995). … Determining whether the Board’s decision was arbitrary or capricious involves a limited inquiry into whether it acted with willful and unreasoning disregard of the facts and circumstances of the case. Fontana v.

City of McCrory, Arkansas v. Wilson

644 S.W.3d 823 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2022

BROWN, Judge This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment alleging statutory immunity pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 21-9-301.1 We reverse. 1 (Supp … –Civ. 2(a). 4 Gentry v. Robinson, 2009 Ark. 634, 361 S.W.3d 788. 5 Id. See City of Farmington v.

Magee v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

75 Ark. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2001

E.g., Fleming v. Director, 73 Ark. App. 86, 88 , 40 S.W.3d 820, 822 (2001). Because we conclude the Board’s decision could not reasonably be reached based upon the evidence before it, we reverse and remand. I. … As explained by our supreme court in Reddick v.

Perry v. Gaddy

48 Ark. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1995

On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529 (c)(1) (1987); Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. … Shipley Baking Co. v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 72 , 703 S.W.2d 465 (1986).