Case law

Margaret E. Nalley v. Michael Adams

625 S.W.3d 336 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 14, 2021

It did not happen in 2012 when the supreme court decided another case that is often cited in this area of the law, Brown v. Brown, 2012 Ark. 89, 387 S.W.3d 159. … (citing Hollandsworth v. Knyzewski, 353 Ark. 470, 109 S.W.3d 653 (2003); Brown v. Brown, 2012 Ark. 89, 387 S.W.3d 159). I respectfully disagree with Dent’s statement of the law given the timing of the mother’s move.

Crystal Watson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And, Peco Foods, Inc.

2024 Ark. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2024

V. … Furthermore, Daubert v.

Jennifer Hernandez v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 10, 2021

OF REVIEW V. … On December 3, 2020, the Tribunal conducted a hearing pursuant to Paulino v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 676, 559 S.W.2d 760 (Ark.

Lambert v. State

34 Ark. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 15, 1991

See Alabama v. White, supra; see also Willett v. State, 298 Ark. 588 , 769 S.W.2d 744 (1989); Nottingham v. State, 29 Ark. App. 95 , 778 S.W.2d 629 (1989). The Court in Alabama v. … If Alabama v.

Aaron C. Keeney and Laura J. Keeney v. David McQueen and Tina McQueen

2021 Ark. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 27, 2021

See, e.g., Bayird v. Floyd, 2009 Ark. 455, 344 S.W.3d 80. … See, e.g., Gentry v. Robinson, 2009 Ark. 634, 361 S.W.3d 788.

Lovelace v. Director, Employment SEC. Dept.

78 Ark. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 26, 2002

On appeal, the findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Walls v. Director, Employment Sec. Dep’t, 74 Ark. App. 424 , 49 S.W.3d 670 (2001). … See Allen v. Kizer, 294 Ark. 1 , 740 S.W.2d 137 (1987); DeClerk v. Tribble, 276 Ark. 316 , 637 S.W.2d 526 (1982). In Peterson v.

State Treasurer, Second Injury Fund v. Coleman

16 Ark. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1985

Bragg v. Evans-St. Clair, Inc., 15 Ark. App. 53 , 688 S.W.2d 956 (1985); Terrell v. Austin Bridge Co., 10 Ark. App. 1 , 660 S.W.2d 941 (1983). … We have previously held in Craighead Memorial Hospital v. Honeycutt, 5 Ark. App. 90 , 633 S.W.2d 53 (1982), and Harrison Furniture v. Chrobak, 2 Ark.

Estes v. Walters

269 Ark. 891 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1980

In Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass’n Board v. … See: Public Citizens, et al., v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, et al., 565 F. 2d 708 (1977); McDowell v. Schlesinger (DC MO) 404 F. Supp. 221 . In Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass’n Board v.

Brooks v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

62 Ark. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 6, 1998

Hiner v. Director, 61 Ark. App. 139 , 965 S.W.2d 785 , (1998); Rodriguez v. Director, 59 Ark. App. 8 , 952 S.W.2d 186 (1997). … This court reviews the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in a light most favorable to the Board of Review’s findings. Rucker v. Director, 52 Ark. App. 126 , 915 S.W.2d 315 (1996).

Tilson v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

91 Ark. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 18, 2005

On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Trigg v. Director, 72 Ark. App. 266 , 34 S.W.3d 783 (2000); Hunt v. Director, 57 Ark. … We distinguish this case from Trigg v.

Howell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Serv. & Minor Children

545 S.W.3d 218 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 14, 2018

Wilburn v. Keenan Cos. , 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989) ; *221 Edmonson v. Farris , 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). The same reasoning applies to service requirements imposed by court rules. … Halliman v. Stiles , 250 Ark. 249 , 464 S.W.2d 573 (1971) ; Edmonson , [ supra ]. Actual knowledge of a proceeding does not validate defective process. Tucker v. Johnson , 275 Ark. 61 , 628 S.W.2d 281 (1982). Carruth v.

Caldwell v. Blytheville, Arkansas School District, No. Five

23 Ark. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1988

A school board’s action in this regard is arbitrary and capricious only if the board’s decision is not supportable on any rational basis. Leola, supra; Lee v. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968); (2) whether the protected activity was a substantial or motivating factor in the actions taken against the employee, Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Phillip Harrison v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Creative Co-Op, Inc.

2021 Ark. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 10, 2021

Coker v. Dir., 99 Ark. App. 455, 262 S.W.3d 175 (2007). The findings of fact made by the Board are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. Id. … Reasons for late filing involve factual issues to be determined by the Board and not this court on appeal. Johnsen v. Dir., 2012 Ark. App. 634, at 1–2.

Grace Drilling Co. v. Director of Labor

31 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 2, 1990

In an appeal of an employment security case, findings of fact by the Board of Review are deemed conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Edwards v. Stiles, 23 Ark. App. 96 , 743 S.W.2d 12 (1988). … Exson v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 177 , 656 S.W.2d 711 (1983). See also Feagin v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 59 , 652 S.W.2d 839 (1983).

Kristin Caldwell v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 294 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 2, 2021

OF REVIEW V. … On October 21, 2020, the Tribunal conducted a Paulino hearing to determine whether the untimely filing of the appeal was due to circumstances outside 1 Paulino v.

Clark v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

469 S.W.3d 808 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 2015

Appellant timely appealed to the Board. … Holmes v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 337, 463 S.W.3d 744; Ivy v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 381.

Emerald Development Co. v. McNeill

82 Ark. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 14, 2003

See Miller v. Jasinski, supra. Emerald relies on Milligan v. … See Brown v. SEECO, Inc., 316 Ark. 336 , 871 S.W.2d 580 (1994). The prospect of irreparable harm or lack of an otherwise adequate remedy at law is at the foundation of the power to issue injunctive relief.

Rankin v. Director, Employment Security Department

82 Ark. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2003

On July 3, 2002, this court handed down Rankin v. Director, 78 Ark. … Linder v. Linder, 348 Ark. 322 , 72 S.W.3d 841 (2002).

Rankin v. Director

78 Ark. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 3, 2002

The Board of Review affirmed and adopted the decision of the Appeal Tribunal. We will affirm the decision of the Board of Review if it is supported by substantial evidence. Hiner v. Director, 61 Ark. … The question is whether the Board could reasonably reach its decision upon the evidence before it. Rodriguez v. Director, 59 Ark. App. 8 , 952 S.W.2d 186 (1997). In Dingmann v.

West v. Director

94 Ark. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2006

Nibco, Inc. v. Metcalf, 1 Ark. App. 114 , 613 S.W.2d 612 (1981). … Brooks v. Director, 62 Ark. App. 85 , 966 S.W.2d 941 (1998).