Case law

Aaron C. Keeney and Laura J. Keeney v. David McQueen and Tina McQueen

2021 Ark. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 27, 2021

See, e.g., Bayird v. Floyd, 2009 Ark. 455, 344 S.W.3d 80. … See, e.g., Gentry v. Robinson, 2009 Ark. 634, 361 S.W.3d 788.

Williams v. Director

79 Ark. App. 407 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 13, 2002

In Baker v. Director, 39 Ark. … In Grigsby v. Everett, 8 Ark.

Howell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Serv. & Minor Children

545 S.W.3d 218 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 14, 2018

Wilburn v. Keenan Cos. , 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989) ; *221 Edmonson v. Farris , 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). The same reasoning applies to service requirements imposed by court rules. … Halliman v. Stiles , 250 Ark. 249 , 464 S.W.2d 573 (1971) ; Edmonson , [ supra ]. Actual knowledge of a proceeding does not validate defective process. Tucker v. Johnson , 275 Ark. 61 , 628 S.W.2d 281 (1982). Carruth v.

Lybyer v. Springdale Sch. Dist.

568 S.W.3d 805 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 13, 2019

See Superior Indus. v. Thomaston , 72 Ark. App. 7 , 32 S.W.3d 52 (2000), and Tyson Poultry, Inc. v. Narvaiz , 2012 Ark. 118 , 388 S.W.3d 16 . … Hixson and Brown, JJ., agree. Arkansas law permits the Commission to adopt the ALJ's opinion. Gunter v. Bill's Super Foods, Inc. , 2018 Ark. App. 134 , at 4, 544 S.W.3d 571 , 573.

ARK. BD. OF REGIS. OF GEOLOGISTS v. Ackley

984 S.W.2d 67 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1998

984 S.W.2d 67 (1998) 64 Ark.App. 325 ARKANSAS BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS, Appellant, v. Richard ACKLEY, Appellee. No. CA 98-585. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. … Moore v. King, 328 Ark. 639, 643 , 945 S.W.2d 358, 360 (1997).

Mark Meredith v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2026 Ark. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 11, 2026

Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 205, 575 S.W.3d 186. … Further, as to Meredith’s assertion that the Board misinterpreted his testimony concerning the number of times he referred a friend, we defer credibility determinations to the Board as the finder of fact. Keener v.

Allen v. State

2015 Ark. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 21, 2015

to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. … Allen v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 415. 4 Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1). 5 Id. 6 Brown v. State, 85 Ark. App. 382, 155 S.W.3d 22 (2004). 7 Campbell v.

State Treasurer, Second Injury Fund v. Coleman

16 Ark. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1985

Bragg v. Evans-St. Clair, Inc., 15 Ark. App. 53 , 688 S.W.2d 956 (1985); Terrell v. Austin Bridge Co., 10 Ark. App. 1 , 660 S.W.2d 941 (1983). … We have previously held in Craighead Memorial Hospital v. Honeycutt, 5 Ark. App. 90 , 633 S.W.2d 53 (1982), and Harrison Furniture v. Chrobak, 2 Ark.

Brooks v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

62 Ark. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 6, 1998

Hiner v. Director, 61 Ark. App. 139 , 965 S.W.2d 785 , (1998); Rodriguez v. Director, 59 Ark. App. 8 , 952 S.W.2d 186 (1997). … This court reviews the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in a light most favorable to the Board of Review’s findings. Rucker v. Director, 52 Ark. App. 126 , 915 S.W.2d 315 (1996).

Robert F. Boerner v. Celina Richard

2025 Ark. App. 217 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 9, 2025

See One 1979 Brown Ford Pickup Truck v. … Last, citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.

Tilson v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

91 Ark. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 18, 2005

On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Trigg v. Director, 72 Ark. App. 266 , 34 S.W.3d 783 (2000); Hunt v. Director, 57 Ark. … We distinguish this case from Trigg v.

Daniel Carman v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Dewayne Higgins Trucking Co., Inc.

700 S.W.3d 212 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2024

We do not conduct de novo reviews in appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, at 1, 618 S.W.3d 446, 448. … Collie v. Ark. State Med.

Phillip Harrison v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Creative Co-Op, Inc.

2021 Ark. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 10, 2021

Coker v. Dir., 99 Ark. App. 455, 262 S.W.3d 175 (2007). The findings of fact made by the Board are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. Id. … Reasons for late filing involve factual issues to be determined by the Board and not this court on appeal. Johnsen v. Dir., 2012 Ark. App. 634, at 1–2.

Davis v. Davis

48 Ark. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1995

Brown v. Cole, 27 Ark. App. 213, 215 , 768 S.W.2d 549 (1989). In order to establish that a deed absolute on its face is in fact a mortgage, the evidence must be clear, unequivocal, and convincing, Brown v. Cole, 27 Ark. … Brown v. Cole, 27 Ark. App. at 216 . The chancellor held that any thought that the deed was anything other than a mortgage is “ridiculous,” and we cannot say this holding is clearly erroneous.

Roberson v. Director of Labor

28 Ark. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 30, 1989

Wacaster v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 190 , 603 S.W.2d 907 (Ark. App. 1979). While the term “good cause” may be difficult to define, it means a justifiable reason for not accepting a particular job. Id. … Smith v. Everett, 6 Ark. App. 337 , 642 S.W.2d 320 (1982). Affirmed. Corbin, C.J., and Jennings, J., agree.

Edwards v. Stiles

23 Ark. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1988

Neither the Appeal Tribunal nor the Board of Review, however, are bound by common law or statutory rules of evidence. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1107(d)(4) (Supp. 1985); Bockman v. … Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W.2d 954 (1978). We find, upon reviewing the record, that the Board was reasonably able to reach its results from the evidence presented to it.

Rankin v. Director, Employment Security Department

82 Ark. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2003

On July 3, 2002, this court handed down Rankin v. Director, 78 Ark. … Linder v. Linder, 348 Ark. 322 , 72 S.W.3d 841 (2002).

Rivera v. Dir.

560 S.W.3d 797 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2018

Our court does not conduct a de novo review in appeals from the Board. Snyder v. Dir. , 81 Ark. App. 262 , 101 S.W.3d 270 (2003). … Instead, we review the Board's findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Price v. Dir. , 2013 Ark.

Proctor v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2013

Price v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 205, at 2. … Beck v. Dir., 65 Ark. App. 8, 987 S.W.2d 733 (1999). We affirm the Board’s denial of benefits.

Baker v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department

39 Ark. App. 5 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 24, 1992

Olson v. Everett, 8 Ark. App. 230 , 650 S.W.2d 247 (1983). Determining whether a claimant had been guilty of misconduct on account of dishonesty is a question of fact for the Board of Review to determine. Id. … The credibility of witnesses and the drawing of inferences from the testimony is for the Board of Review, not this court. W.C. Lee Construction Co. v. Stiles, 13 Ark. App. 303 , 683 S.W.2d 616 (1985).