Case law

Wright v. Viele

429 S.W.3d 314 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 4, 2013

Dunaway; Verelle Dipert; Dan Dipert; Billie Jean Brown; Charles Hewitt; Griffin Moore; E.F. Evers; General Crude Oil Co.; W.A. Brown; Brown Foundation, Inc.; Stephanie H. Darnell; Timothy Hewett; G.C.O. … Brown; Brown Foundation, Inc.; Stephanie H. Darnell; and Timothy Hewett. 3  Cite as 2013 Ark. App.

Barber v. Director, Employment Security Department

67 Ark. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1999

Jackson v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 714 , 600 S.W.2d 427 (1980); and see Hiner v. Director, supra. … While there is some authority for reversal when the basis of denial is changed for the first time at the Board of Review level, Linscott v. Director, 9 Ark.

Cook v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

480 S.W.3d 194 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 13, 2016

OF REVIEW V. … We do not conduct de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. Rockin J Ranch, LLC v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, 2015 Ark. App. 465, 469 S.W.3d 368.

Snyder v. Snyder

13 Ark. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1985

Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 (1881). The appellant contends that requiring the estate to pay the balance of the mortgage, in essence, is requiring Mr. Snyder to pay “a specific sum of money as alimony.” … The appellant cites Birnstill v.

Proctor v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2013

Price v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 205, at 2. … Beck v. Dir., 65 Ark. App. 8, 987 S.W.2d 733 (1999). We affirm the Board’s denial of benefits.

Baldor Electric Co. v. Arkansas Employment Security Department

71 Ark. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 11, 2000

Corp. v. Daniels, 1 Ark. App. 6 , 611 S.W.2d 794 (1981). We review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. See Feagin v. Everett, 9 Ark. … See Arlington Hotel v. Employment Sec. Div., 3 Ark. App. 281 , 625 S.W.2d 551 (1981). Given these standards, we must affirm the decision of the Board of Review.

Law Offices of Cook v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

431 S.W.3d 337 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2013

We do not conduct a de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. Snyder v. Director, 81 Ark. App. 262, 101 S.W.3d 270 (2003). … When the Board affirms and adopts the decision of the Appeal Tribunal, the Appeal Tribunal decision becomes the decision of the Board for purposes of appellate review. Ferren v. Director, 59 Ark.

Arlington Hotel v. Employment Security Division

3 Ark. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1981

Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W. 2d 954 (1978). … Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 795 , 601 S.W. 2d 890 (Ark. App. 1980); Brewer v. Everett, Director, supra.

Wade v. State

2014 Ark. App. 2 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 8, 2014

The two men who committed the robbery were described in detail during a subsequent interview; one man was described as wearing a brown jacket and a brown ball cap with two chrome-colored metal spikes on each side, while … In South Dakota v.

A. Tenenbaum Co. v. Director of Labor

32 Ark. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1990

Citing Feagin v. Everett, 9 Ark. … Dillaha Fruit Co. v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 51 , 652 S.W.2d 643 (1983).

Shipley Baking Co. v. Stiles

17 Ark. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1986

Dillaha Fruit Co. v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 51 , 652 S.W.2d 643 (1983); Nibco, Inc. v. Metcalf, 1 Ark. App. 114 , 613 S.W.2d 612 (1981). … On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are deemed conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Feagin v. Everett, 9 Ark. App. 59 , 652 S.W.2d 839 (1983).

Amanda Sharum v. Director, Arkansas Department of Commerce, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 3, 2021

Opinion Delivered November 3, 2021 AMANDA SHARUM APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS V. … On 14 December 2020, the Board received Sharum’s untimely appeal of the Tribunal’s decision. According to the Board, Sharum’s appeal was filed on December 14 but was due no later than December 7.

Law Offices of Craig L. Cook v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 486 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2013

Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 COOK APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW V. … See Moody v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 350. Rebriefing ordered. WHITEAKER and VAUGHT, JJ., agree. The Law Offices of Craig L. Cook, by: Trella A. Sparks and Craig L. Cook, for appellant.

Kimble v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

60 Ark. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1997

Calvin v. Director, 31 Ark. App. 74 , 787 S.W.2d 701 (1990). We review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Perdrix-Wang v. … See, e.g.y Schappe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 392 A.2d 353 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978).

Charles Fred Martin v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, and Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Inc.

2021 Ark. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2021

The Board affirmed the Tribunal’s decision of an eighteen-week disqualification without any explanation. The Board repeats the contradictory finding of the Tribunal. … See Worsham v. Dir., 2016 Ark. 146, 489 S.W.3d 162. The basic rule of statutory construction to which all other interpretive guides defer is to give effect to the intent of the drafting body. Id.

Steffy v. City of Fort Smith

545 S.W.3d 804 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 7, 2018

Ross v. State , 347 Ark. 334 , 64 S.W.3d 272 (2002) ; Vickers v. State , 313 Ark. 64 , 852 S.W.2d 787 (1993). … Hixson and Brown, JJ., dissent.

Jones v. Director of Labor

8 Ark. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 25, 1983

We remand to the board because it considered evidence that was not before the tribunal, contrary to our holding in Mark Smith v. Everett, 6 Ark. … Aaron v. Everett, 6 Ark. App. 424 , 644 S.W.2d 301 (1982).

ARK. BD. OF REGIS. OF GEOLOGISTS v. Ackley

984 S.W.2d 67 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1998

984 S.W.2d 67 (1998) 64 Ark.App. 325 ARKANSAS BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS, Appellant, v. Richard ACKLEY, Appellee. No. CA 98-585. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. … Moore v. King, 328 Ark. 639, 643 , 945 S.W.2d 358, 360 (1997).

Linscott v. Director of Labor

9 Ark. App. 103 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1983

The Pennsylvania Board of Review in Libonate v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation, 426 A.2d 247 (Pa. Commw. … In a line of Oregon cases, Publishers Paper Co. v. Morgan, 498 P.2d 798 (Or. Ct. App. 1972), Kuraspediani v. Employment Division, 590 P.2d 294 (Or. Ct. App. 1979), and Swezey v. Employment Division, 615 P.2d 1103 (Or.

Law Offices of Craig L. Cook v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 486 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2013

Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 COOK APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW V. … See Moody v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 350. Rebriefing ordered. WHITEAKER and VAUGHT, JJ., agree. The Law Offices of Craig L. Cook, by: Trella A. Sparks and Craig L. Cook, for appellant.