Case law

Weinstein v. Director, Arkansas Department of Workforce Services

2013 Ark. App. 374 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 5, 2013

We affirm the Board’s decision to deny benefits. The Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Ark.Code Ann. § 11-10-529(c)(1) (Repl.2012); Perry v. … West v. Dir., 94 Ark.App. 381, 383 , 231 S.W.3d 96, 98 (2006).

ULANDA DIGBY-BRANCH v. WESTSIDE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SCOTT J. GAUNTT, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE WESTSIDE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICt

2023 Ark. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 15, 2023

No. 25 v. Steele, 347 Ark. 193, 198, 61 S.W.3d 801, 803–04 (2001). … Wood v. Lathrop, 249 Ark. 376, 379, 459 S.W.2d 808, 809–10 (1970); Deltic Timber Corp. v. Newland, 2010 Ark. App. 276, 374 S.W.3d 261.

Clifton Services, Inc. v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, Employer Contributions Unit

445 S.W.3d 538 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 22, 2014

The appellate courts will affirm the decision of the Board of Review if it is supported by substantial evidence. Mamo Transp., Inc. v. … Stepherson v. Dir., 49 Ark. App. 52, 895 S.W.2d 950 (1995); Am. Transp. Corp. v. Dir., 39 Ark. App. 104, 840 S.W.2d 198 (1992); Morris v. Everett, 7 Ark.

Fleming v. DIRECTOR. ARK. EMP. SEC. DEPT.

73 Ark. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 14, 2001

Code Ann. § ll-10-514(a), is Nibco, Inc. v. Metcalf, 1 Ark. … See also McKissick v. Rolle, 61 Ark. App. 266, 269 , 966 S.W.2d 921, 923-924 (1998); Rollins v. Director, 58 Ark. App. 58, 61 , 945 S.W.2d 410, 411 (1997).

Lewis v. State

2009 Ark. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 24, 2009

They heard a board break and saw him jump over the privacy fence. Neither officer attempted to pursue the man beyond the backyard. … Rodriguez v. State, 372 Ark. 335 , 276 S.W.3d 208 (2008) (citing Morris v. State, 358 Ark. 455 , 193 S.W.3d 243 (2004); Pugh v. State, 351 Ark. 5 , 89 S.W.3d 909 (2002)).

Barb's 3-D Demo Service v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

69 Ark. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 22, 2000

On appeal, the findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Steinert v. Director, 64 Ark. App. 122 , 979 S.W.2d 908 (1998); Network Design Eng’g, Inc. v. … Steinert v. Director, supra. We review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deduci-dle therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Steinert v. Director, supra; Network Design Eng’g, Inc. v.

Kathy Hicks v. Director, Division of Workforce Services And John Cage Enterprises

2023 Ark. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 6, 2023

OF REVIEW V. … The Board affirmed the Tribunal’s decision. Hicks’s appeal from the Board’s decision is also handed down today. Hicks v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 371 (Hicks I).

Niece v. Director, Employment Security Department

67 Ark. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1999

The credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony are matters to be resolved by the Board of Review. Anderson v. Director, 59 Ark. App. 266 , 957 S.W.2d 712 (1997). … Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. App. 218 , 856 S.W.2d 636 (1993). The Board relied on the case of George’s Inc. v. Director, 50 Ark.

Cheryl Pillow v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

684 S.W.3d 302 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 7, 2024

[NO. 2022-BR-01683] V. … Rossini v. Dir., 81 Ark.

Daniel Thomas v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 7, 2025

In Steward v. State, 2022 Ark. … Varnell v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 191, at 6, ___ S.W.3d ___, ___.

W.C. Lee Construction v. Stiles

13 Ark. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1985

Whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings is a question of law. Cooney v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 930 , 606 S.W.2d 615 (Ark. App. 1980). … Brewer v. Everett, 3 Ark. App. 59 , 621 S.W.2d 883 (1981). In Willis Johnson Co., v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 795 , 601 S.W.2d 890 (Ark.

Hiner v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

61 Ark. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1998

As Judge George Howard wrote in Wacaster v. … Based on our established position that arguments raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered, we decline to reverse the Board of Review on that ground. See Hooks v. Pratte, 53 Ark.

Bradford v. Director, Employment Security Department

83 Ark. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 5, 2003

We affirm the decision of the Board of Review. The findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Walls v. Director, 74 Ark. App. 424 , 49 S.W.3d 670 (2001). … We affirm the decision of the Board of Review. In Osterhout v. Everett, 6 Ark.

Greenberg v. Director, Employment Security Department

53 Ark. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 22, 1996

George’s, Inc. v. Director, 50 Ark. App. 77 , 900 S.W.2d 590 (1995). There is an element of intent associated with a determination of misconduct. Id. In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 795 , 601 S.W.2d 890 (Ark. … Sadler v. Stiles, 22 Ark. App. 117 , 735 S.W.2d 708 (1987). However, we are not at liberty to ignore our responsibility to determine whether the standard of review has been met. Riceland Foods, Inc. v. Director, 38 Ark.

Nelson v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 25, 2013

We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Rodriguez v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 361; Price v. … Lewis v. Dir., 84 Ark. App. 381, 141 S.W.3d 896 (2004).

Bennett v. Director

73 Ark. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 18, 2001

This court’s jurisdiction is derived from the appeal, and we may not render any judgment that the Board of Review could not have rendered. See Markham v. Evans, 239 Ark. 1154 , 397 S.W.2d 365 (1965). … Baldor Electric Co. v. Arkansas Employment Sec. Dep’t, 71 Ark. App. 166 , 27 S.W.3d 771 (2000).

Stephanie Morgan v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

684 S.W.3d 309 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 7, 2024

We affirm the decision of the Board of Review if it is supported by substantial evidence. Billings v. Dir., 84 Ark. App. 79, 133 S.W.3d 399 (2003). … Buchanan v. Dir. 91 Ark. App. 35, 37, 207 S.W.3d 567, 569 (2005). In Hefton v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 857, 606 S.W.2d 379 (Ark.

ULANDA DIGBY-BRANCH v. WESTSIDE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5 AND SCOTT J. GAUNTT, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE WESTSIDE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICt

2023 Ark. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 15, 2023

No. 25 v. Steele, 347 Ark. 193, 198, 61 S.W.3d 801, 803–04 (2001). … Wood v. Lathrop, 249 Ark. 376, 379, 459 S.W.2d 808, 809–10 (1970); Deltic Timber Corp. v. Newland, 2010 Ark. App. 276, 374 S.W.3d 261.

Tyler v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

532 S.W.3d 618 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2017

In appeals of unemployment-compensation cases, we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Coker v. Dir., 99 Ark. … However, that is not to say that our function on appeal is merely to ratify whatever decision is made by the Board. Boothe v. Dir., 59 Ark. App. 169, 954 S.W.2d 946 (1997).

Wright v. Viele

429 S.W.3d 314 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 4, 2013

Dunaway; Verelle Dipert; Dan Dipert; Billie Jean Brown; Charles Hewitt; Griffin Moore; E.F. Evers; General Crude Oil Co.; W.A. Brown; Brown Foundation, Inc.; Stephanie H. Darnell; Timothy Hewett; G.C.O. … Brown; Brown Foundation, Inc.; Stephanie H. Darnell; and Timothy Hewett. 3  Cite as 2013 Ark. App.