Case law

Worden v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

[NO. 2012-BR-03276] V. … Vaughn v. Everett, 5 Ark. App. 149, 633 S.W.2d 401 (1982).

Katherine McClerkin v. Rogue Construction, LLC

2022 Ark. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 14, 2022

Billingsley v. Benton NWA Props., LLC, 2015 Ark. 291. … McClerkin v.

Pool v. State

29 Ark. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 29, 1989

See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975). In Wong Sun v. … See Brown v. Illinois, supra.

Andrew Bushnell v. Director, Arkansas Department of Commerce, Division of Workforce Services

645 S.W.3d 24 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2022

We affirm Board of Review decisions when they are supported by substantial evidence. Robinson v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 485, 638 S.W.3d 29. … Garrett v. Dir., 2014 Ark. 50, 2014 WL 495124. We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Id.

Nelson v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 25, 2013

We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Rodriguez v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 361; Price v. … Lewis v. Dir., 84 Ark. App. 381, 141 S.W.3d 896 (2004).

Pack v. Little Rock Convention & Visitors Bureau

2011 Ark. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 7, 2011

In Nabholz Construction Corp. v. … HART, MARTIN, HOOFMAN, and BROWN, JJ., dissent. . In Pack I, there was evidence that Pack's mother left him alone while she worked from 5 a.m. to 1 p.m. while he was living with her.

Burch v. Bassett

503 S.W.3d 852 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 5, 2016

We do not conduct a de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. Snyder v. Dir., 81 Ark. App. 262, 101 S.W.3d 270 (2003). … This court affirms the Board of Review’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Garrett v.

Billings v. Director, Employment Security Department

84 Ark. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2003

The findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Walls v. Director, 74 Ark. App. 424 , 49 S.W.3d 670 (2001). … We review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Lovelace v. Director, 78 Ark. App. 127 , 79 S.W.3d 400 (2002).

Ison v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co.

93 Ark. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 11, 2006

Brown, individually and as their son’s parents, and Mrs. … Co. v.

Katiana Cole v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Children

611 S.W.3d 218 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 21, 2020

Griffin v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 635. … DHS, citing Bryant v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 2011 Ark.

Richard Hastings v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2025 Ark. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 5, 2025

Debnam v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 537, at 4–5, 471 S.W.3d 657, 660. See also Garrett v. … The Board notes that the Arkansas Court of Appeals held in 9  Woodunique, Inc., v. Director, 103 Ark.

Earp v. Benton Fire Department

52 Ark. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 14, 1996

As noted earlier, the effective date of the Board’s decision sets the time for filing an appeal. In McCarty v. Board of Trustees, 45 Ark. … We also quoted the following language from North Hills Memorial Gardens v.

Clark v. Director, Employment Security Department

83 Ark. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 29, 2003

In rendering its decision, the Board cited the standard set forth in Nibco, supra, and Kimble v. Director, Arkansas Empl. Sec. Dep’t, 60 Ark. App. 36 , 959 S.W.2d 66 (1997). … See Walls v. Director, Empl. Sec. Dep’t, 74 Ark. App. 424, 426-27 , 49 S.W.3d 670, 672-73 (2001) (reversing Board finding no evidence of intentional violation of written policy regarding absenteeism); B.J.

Millspaugh v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 450 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 28, 2013

E-13-128 TANYA MILLSPAUGH Opinion Delivered August 28, 2013 APPELLANT ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW V. … We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Rodriguez v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 361; Price v.

Rose Care, Inc. v. Ross

91 Ark. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 1, 2005

Aka v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass’n, supra. In Advocat, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Fry v. Director of Labor

16 Ark. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1985

In Mark Smith v. Everett, supra, we stated: As a part of this decision, we further hold that the Board does not have the jurisdiction to accept additional evidence in appeals pending before it. However, in Jones v. … The board affirmed the decision of the referee and did not consider the additional evidence, citing Mark Smith v. Everett, supra.

Stewart v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 23, 2013

E-13-270 DERRICK STEWART Opinion Delivered October 23, 2013 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS V. … We review the findings of the Board in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, reversing only where the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Ballard v. Dir., Ark.

Camp v. Liberatore

1 Ark. App. 300 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 13, 1981

Gregory v. Jones, 212 Ark. 443 , 206 S.W. 2d 18 ; Vaughn v. Chandler, 237 Ark. 214 , 372 S.W. 2d 213 . … Malone v. Mobbs, 102 Ark. 542 , 146 S.W. 143 .

Fryer v. Boyett

64 Ark. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1998

Citing Brown v. Cooper Clinic, P.A., 734 F.2d 1298 (8th Cir. 1984), appellants contend that, because the contracts are silent on this question, no such right existed. Brown v. … In Brown v. Cooper Clinic, the appellant’s salary was not directly tied to his personal billings or collections; thus, his agreement with the clinic was materially different from the contracts involved herein.

Flywheel Energy Production, LLC v. Van Buren County, Arkansas; And Van Buren County Judge, Dale James, in His Official Capacity as Van Buren County Judge

2026 Ark. App. 3 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 7, 2026

(“SEECO”), acquired a road easement and right of way (the “Easement”) from the Hugh and Helen Brown Revocable Trust (the “Brown Trust”). … Hill v. McClintock, 175 Ark. 1059, 1062, 1 S.W.2d 564, 565 (1928) (citing Johnson v. West, 89 Ark. 604, 117 S.W. 770 (1909); McMahan v. Ruble, 135 Ark. 83, 204 S.W. 746 (1918)).