Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,193 results
1.34s
Higgins v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
503 S.W.3d 833 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 28, 2016
See, e.g., Johnson v. Dir., 2015 Ark. … Higgins also cites to Walls v. Director, 74 Ark. App. 424, 49 S.W.3d 670 (2001), and to Oliver v. Director, 80 Ark.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBrantley v. Northwest Arkansas Hospitals, LLC
435 S.W.3d 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2014
Smith caused Brantley to fall from the table either by pushing her too hard or by lifting her too high with the roller board. Likewise, the testimony that Wyatt did not see Dr. … State v. Long, 311 Ark. 248 , 844 S.W.2d 302 (1992). . Id. at 252 , 844 S.W.2d at 305 . . Tucker, supra. . Herrington v. Ford Motor Co., 2010 Ark. App. 407 , 376 S.W.3d 476 . . Gray v. Moreland, 2010 Ark.
Cited 3 timesPublished87 Ark. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2004
Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993). … Hodges v. Cannon, supra, citing Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedFayetteville Express Pipeline, LLC v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
533 S.W.3d 106 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2017
Contrary to FEP’s argument, Jim Paws, Inc. v. Equalization Board of Garland County, 289 Ark. 113, 710 S.W.2d 197 (1986), does not require that an adjustment for economic obsolescence be made. … Middleton v. Lockhart, 364 Ark. 32, 216 S.W.3d 98 (2005); Boatmen’s Tr. Co. of Ark. v. Hous. Auth. of N. Little Rock, 346 Ark. 192, 57 S.W.3d 132 (2001); Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435, 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997).
Cited 4 timesPublishedMiller v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCE CORPORATION
98 Ark. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 28, 2007
Finally, in Brown v. … See Thomas v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDavis v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
2009 Ark. App. 815 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 2, 2009
Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Linker-Flores v. … Carroll v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 85 Ark. App. 255 , 148 S.W.3d 780 (2004). A parent’s rights may be terminated even though she is in partial compliance with the case plan. Chase v. Ark.
Cited 13 timesPublished2011 Ark. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2011
At that time, Herbert Brown was living next door until about 2001. Roberts testified that Brown always asked permission to do anything on the west side of his house. After Mr. … Ridenoure v. Ball, 2011 Ark. App. 63 , 381 S.W.3d 101 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedBlanton v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.
575 S.W.3d 186 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2019
We hold that substantial evidence does not support the Board's finding of misconduct; therefore, we reverse and remand. Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. *188 Martinez v. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber stamp Board decisions. Taylor v. Dir. , Department of Workforce Services , 2018 Ark. App. 442 , 558 S.W.3d 420 .
Cited 23 timesPublished2009 Ark. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 27, 2009
In Davidson v. … It was so held in this Rugless case upon the authority of the case of Brown v. State, 28 Ark. 126 [ (1873) ], in which the facts were as follows.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHubbard v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
460 S.W.3d 294 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 15, 2015
Spencer v. Director, 2014 Ark. App. 479 , 2014 WL 4635672 . … We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Price v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 205 , 2013 WL 1232103 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedWhitmer v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
525 S.W.3d 45 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 7, 2017
We do not conduct de novo review in appeals from the Board. Cook v. Dir., 2016 Ark. App. 12, at 3–4, 480 S.W.3d 194, 196–97. … Rockin J Ranch, LLC v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 465, at 2, 469 S.W.3d 368, 370. Our function on appeal, however, is not to merely rubber stamp decisions issued by the Board. Id.
Cited 5 timesPublishedYoung v. Blytheville School District
2013 Ark. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 30, 2013
v. … Doe v. Baum, supra; Brown v. Fountain Hill Sch. Dist., 67 Ark.App. 358 , 1 S.W.3d 27 (1999).
Cited 8 timesPublishedDebnam v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
471 S.W.3d 657 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 30, 2015
Holmes v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 337, 463 S.W.3d 744; Ivy v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 381. … App. 537 v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 20, 702 S.W.2d 421 (1986).
Cited 4 timesPublishedJeremy Johnson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services
2023 Ark. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 24, 2023
Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 205, 575 S.W.3d 186. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark. App. 171, 517 S.W.3d 427.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHaley McPherson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Schlotzky's Deli
640 S.W.3d 653 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2022
McPherson has now appealed from the Board’s decision. II. Standard of Review Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Robinson v. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSuperior Senior Care, Inc. v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Topeka Strickland
2026 Ark. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 6, 2026
APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2025-BR-00606] V. … See Owen v. Dir., 2024 Ark. App. 616, 701 S.W.3d 828.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
470 S.W.3d 277 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 2015
We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Hubbard v. Dir., 2015 Ark. … Spencer v. Dir., 2014 Ark. App. 479, at 1.
Cited 4 timesPublished482 S.W.3d 365 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 3, 2016
Hall v. Hall, 2013 Ark. 330, 429 S.W.3d 219; Brown v. Brown, 2014 Ark. App. 455, 440 S.W.3d 361. … Browning v. Browning, 2015 Ark. App. 104, 455 S.W.3d 863; Cowell v. Long, 2013 Ark. App. 311.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJones v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
439 S.W.3d 85 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 27, 2014
Maxfield v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. … And in Oliver v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrittany Taunton v. Director, Division of Workforce Services
2023 Ark. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 8, 2023
In appeals of unemployment-compensation cases, we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. … Code Ann. § 11-10-532(b)(2); see also King v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 182, at 3, 664 S.W.3d 439, 442. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings as to the state benefits.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna