Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkctapp

5,193 results

1.34s

  • Higgins v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    503 S.W.3d 833 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 28, 2016

    See, e.g., Johnson v. Dir., 2015 Ark. … Higgins also cites to Walls v. Director, 74 Ark. App. 424, 49 S.W.3d 670 (2001), and to Oliver v. Director, 80 Ark.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brantley v. Northwest Arkansas Hospitals, LLC

    435 S.W.3d 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2014

    Smith caused Brantley to fall from the table either by pushing her too hard or by lifting her too high with the roller board. Likewise, the testimony that Wyatt did not see Dr. … State v. Long, 311 Ark. 248 , 844 S.W.2d 302 (1992). . Id. at 252 , 844 S.W.2d at 305 . . Tucker, supra. . Herrington v. Ford Motor Co., 2010 Ark. App. 407 , 376 S.W.3d 476 . . Gray v. Moreland, 2010 Ark.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Loyd

    87 Ark. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2004

    Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993). … Hodges v. Cannon, supra, citing Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fayetteville Express Pipeline, LLC v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

    533 S.W.3d 106 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2017

    Contrary to FEP’s argument, Jim Paws, Inc. v. Equalization Board of Garland County, 289 Ark. 113, 710 S.W.2d 197 (1986), does not require that an adjustment for economic obsolescence be made. … Middleton v. Lockhart, 364 Ark. 32, 216 S.W.3d 98 (2005); Boatmen’s Tr. Co. of Ark. v. Hous. Auth. of N. Little Rock, 346 Ark. 192, 57 S.W.3d 132 (2001); Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435, 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Miller v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCE CORPORATION

    98 Ark. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 28, 2007

    Finally, in Brown v. … See Thomas v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

    2009 Ark. App. 815 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 2, 2009

    Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Linker-Flores v. … Carroll v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 85 Ark. App. 255 , 148 S.W.3d 780 (2004). A parent’s rights may be terminated even though she is in partial compliance with the case plan. Chase v. Ark.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Jackson

    2011 Ark. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2011

    At that time, Herbert Brown was living next door until about 2001. Roberts testified that Brown always asked permission to do anything on the west side of his house. After Mr. … Ridenoure v. Ball, 2011 Ark. App. 63 , 381 S.W.3d 101 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Blanton v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

    575 S.W.3d 186 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2019

    We hold that substantial evidence does not support the Board's finding of misconduct; therefore, we reverse and remand. Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. *188 Martinez v. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber stamp Board decisions. Taylor v. Dir. , Department of Workforce Services , 2018 Ark. App. 442 , 558 S.W.3d 420 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Heard v. State

    2009 Ark. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 27, 2009

    In Davidson v. … It was so held in this Rugless case upon the authority of the case of Brown v. State, 28 Ark. 126 [ (1873) ], in which the facts were as follows.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hubbard v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    460 S.W.3d 294 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 15, 2015

    Spencer v. Director, 2014 Ark. App. 479 , 2014 WL 4635672 . … We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Price v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 205 , 2013 WL 1232103 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Whitmer v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    525 S.W.3d 45 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 7, 2017

    We do not conduct de novo review in appeals from the Board. Cook v. Dir., 2016 Ark. App. 12, at 3–4, 480 S.W.3d 194, 196–97. … Rockin J Ranch, LLC v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 465, at 2, 469 S.W.3d 368, 370. Our function on appeal, however, is not to merely rubber stamp decisions issued by the Board. Id.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Young v. Blytheville School District

    2013 Ark. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 30, 2013

    v. … Doe v. Baum, supra; Brown v. Fountain Hill Sch. Dist., 67 Ark.App. 358 , 1 S.W.3d 27 (1999).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Debnam v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    471 S.W.3d 657 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 30, 2015

    Holmes v. Dir., 2015 Ark. App. 337, 463 S.W.3d 744; Ivy v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 381. … App. 537 v. Stiles, 17 Ark. App. 20, 702 S.W.2d 421 (1986).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jeremy Johnson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

    2023 Ark. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 24, 2023

    Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 205, 575 S.W.3d 186. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark. App. 171, 517 S.W.3d 427.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haley McPherson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Schlotzky's Deli

    640 S.W.3d 653 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2022

    McPherson has now appealed from the Board’s decision. II. Standard of Review Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Robinson v. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Superior Senior Care, Inc. v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Topeka Strickland

    2026 Ark. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 6, 2026

    APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2025-BR-00606] V. … See Owen v. Dir., 2024 Ark. App. 616, 701 S.W.3d 828.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    470 S.W.3d 277 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 2015

    We review the Board’s findings in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Hubbard v. Dir., 2015 Ark. … Spencer v. Dir., 2014 Ark. App. 479, at 1.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Troutman v. Troutman

    482 S.W.3d 365 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 3, 2016

    Hall v. Hall, 2013 Ark. 330, 429 S.W.3d 219; Brown v. Brown, 2014 Ark. App. 455, 440 S.W.3d 361. … Browning v. Browning, 2015 Ark. App. 104, 455 S.W.3d 863; Cowell v. Long, 2013 Ark. App. 311.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    439 S.W.3d 85 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 27, 2014

    Maxfield v. Dir., Ark. Emp’t Sec. … And in Oliver v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brittany Taunton v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

    2023 Ark. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 8, 2023

    In appeals of unemployment-compensation cases, we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. … Code Ann. § 11-10-532(b)(2); see also King v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 182, at 3, 664 S.W.3d 439, 442. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings as to the state benefits.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.