Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkctapp

5,193 results

0.66s

  • Fulgham v. Director, Employment Security Department

    52 Ark. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1996

    On appeal, the findings of fact of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. George’s Inc. v. Director, 50 Ark. App. 77 , 900 S.W.2d 590 (1995). … The facts of this case are parallel to those in Hodges v. Everett, Director, 2 Ark.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Beavers v. Arkansas Board of Examiners in Counseling

    2013 Ark. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2013

    See, e.g., Hamilton v. Ark. Pollution Control & Ecology Comm’n, 333 Ark. 370 , 969 S.W.2d 653 (1998); Soc. Work Licensing Bd. v. Moncebaiz, 332 Ark. 67 , 962 S.W.2d 797 (1998); Wright v. Ark. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. McKinley

    104 Ark. App. 105 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2008

    [Updegraff v. Attorney General, 298 Mich. 48 , 998 N.W. 400 , 401 (1941).]’ In the New York case of Wooddard v. … UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. Charter Hospital of Little Rock, Inc., 297 Ark. 8 , 759 S.W.2d 204 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Blytheville School District Ex Rel. Board of Directors

    516 S.W.3d 785 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2017

    See, e.g., Hankins v. City of Pine Bluff, 217 Ark. 226, 229 S.W.2d 231 (1950) (quoting Woodward v. … v. Greenwood Sch. Dist., 203 Ark. 935, 159 S.W.2d 721 (1942).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lisa Langston v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    680 S.W.3d 493 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 13, 2023

    OF REVIEW V. … BROWN, Judge Appellant, Lisa Langston (Langston), appeals from an order issued on August 11, 2022, by the Arkansas Board of Review (the Board) requiring her to repay $1,860 in overpaid unemployment benefits in

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    517 S.W.3d 427 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 15, 2017

    We review the Board’s finding in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Price v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 205 , 2013 WL 1232103 . … Spencer v. Dir., 2014 Ark. App. 479 , 2014 WL 4635672 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • McCorkle Farms, Inc. v. Thompson

    79 Ark. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 18, 2002

    Brown testified that he considered his tracts of land to be comparable and testified as to his yield in 1992, which was 966 pounds per acre. … We agree that use of the conclusion of the Plant Board report meets this definition. At common law, a judgment from another case would not be admitted. Nipper v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Dillinger v. Dir.

    596 S.W.3d 62 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 26, 2020

    We do not conduct de novo reviews in appeals from the Board. West v. Dir., 94 Ark. App. 381, 231 S.W.3d 96 (2006). … We therefore reverse the Board’s decision and remand the case for an award of benefits. Reversed and remanded. GLADWIN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Betty Dillinger, pro se appellant.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Heather King v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    2023 Ark. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 29, 2023

    BROWN, Judge This is an unbriefed unemployment benefits case. … Our recent decision in Carman v. Director, 2023 Ark.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cheryl Pillow v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

    2022 Ark. App. 341 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 21, 2022

    OF REVIEW V. … Lawrence v. Everett, 9 Ark.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Ozark School District No. 14

    2 Ark. App. 112 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1981

    See Johnson v. Robins, 223 Ark. 150 , 264 S.W. 2d 640 (1954). All necessary parties have not been brought into court. … See Laman v. Martin, 235 Ark. 938 , 362 S.W. 2d 711 (1962). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Cooper, J., dissents.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. McIlroy Bank and Trust

    2 Ark. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1981

    The appellants are Ben Hunt, Jeanne Hunt, George Brown and Coweta Brown, all of whom were doing business at S.B.H. Farms. … Irvin v. Brown Paper Mills Company, 52 F. Supp. 43 (D. C.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Powhatan Cemetery, Inc. v. Colbert

    104 Ark. App. 290 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 4, 2009

    The case of Slade v. Gammill, 226 Ark. 244 , 289 S.W.2d 176 (1956), is helpful on this point. Slade v. Gammill involved an 1848 deed in which Warner Brown conveyed property to three trustees of a cemetery. … Again, in Vaughan v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kesterson v. Kesterson

    21 Ark. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1987

    Divorce from bed and board is a statutory remedy and is based on the same grounds as those specified for an absolute divorce. Lytle v. Lytle, 266 Ark. 124 , 583 S.W.2d 1 (1979). … Brown v. Brown, 233 Ark. 422 , 345 S.W.2d 27 (1961). Since child custody actions are derivative of divorce or separate maintenance, Robins v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of Architects

    79 Ark. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 25, 2002

    App. 2001); Manchin v. Browning, 170 W.Va. 779 , 296 S.E.2d 909 (1982). … Attorney General v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm’n, supra; Manchin v. Browning, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powhatan Cemetery Ass'n v. Phillips

    90 Ark. App. 424 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 6, 2005

    The case of Slade v. Gammill, 226 Ark. 244 , 289 S.W.2d 176 (1956), is helpful on this point. Slade v. Gammill involved an 1848 deed in which Warner Brown conveyed property to three trustees of a cemetery. … Again, in Vaughan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ahrend v. Director, Employment Security Division

    55 Ark. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1996

    Applying the substantial evidence standard of review as we must to the Board’s decision, we cannot say the Board erred on this point. Perdrix-Wang v. Director, 42 Ark. App. 218 , 856 S.W.2d 636 (1993). … Brown v. Director, 54 Ark. App. 205 , 924 S.W.2d 492 (1996).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dana Brehm v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    2022 Ark. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2022

    See Harris v. Dir., 2014 Ark. … Accordingly, we remand to the Board for further findings. 3 Remanded. BARRETT and BROWN, JJ., agree. Dana Brehm, pro se appellant. Cynthia L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Dukes

    269 Ark. 581 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 7, 1980

    After the hearing, based upon which the referee held for the appellant, Brown Jordan, Dukes appealed to the board of review and sent to the board a statement signed by Walker saying he had given no fireworks to Dukes. … Service Comm’n v. Continental Tel. Co., 262 Ark. 821 , 561 S.W. 2d 645 (1978). The error in considering evidence of which a party had no notice is, of course, far more egregious.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Harding Logistics Inc. v. Director

    2026 Ark. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 20, 2026

    Opinion Delivered May 20, 2026 APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT BOARD OF REVIEW V. … Spa v. Dir., 2024 Ark. App. 284 (citing IHOP #1914 v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 102 (holding that corporations must be represented by licensed attorneys)). 2 Id. 3 Super 8 Motel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.