Case law

Dellmarie Dawson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

2023 Ark. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 6, 2023

OF REVIEW V. … Later, Dawson filed an untimely appeal to the Board of Review (Board) from the decision of the Tribunal.

Arkansas Towing & Recovery Board v. A-1 Recovery Towing of North Little Rock

2026 Ark. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 18, 2026

In Oldenberg v. Arkansas State Medical Board, 2013 Ark. … See, e.g., Rogers v. Wood Mfg., 46 Ark.

Rose v. Daniels

269 Ark. 679 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 28, 1980

What constitutes good cause is usually a question of fact within the province of the Board of Review. Harris v. Daniels, supra. … Captain Brown gave his approval for her to ride from Evansville, Indiana, to Helena, Arkansas. The evidence shows that Captain Brown boarded the boat at Memphis, and when the boat got to Helena, Mr.

Collins v. Arkansas Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

430 S.W.3d 213 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 13, 2013

Collins’s claim that she was a victim of sex discrimination, were not made to the Board and thus are not preserved for review. See Ark. Bd. of Exam’rs in Counseling v. … Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Board. Affirmed. WALMSLEY and BROWN, JJ., agree. Larry J. Steele PLC, by: Larry J. Steele, for appellant.

Zepecki v. Arkansas Veterinary Medical Examining Board

430 S.W.3d 803 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 20, 2013

As we previously stated, we review the decision of the Board and not the decision of the circuit court. See Bixler, supra. In Arkansas State Board of Cosmetology v. … Bd. of Registration for Prof'l Geologists v. Ackley, 64 Ark.App. 325 , 984 S.W.2d 67 (1998). Dr. Zepecki relies on our supreme court’s decision in Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v.

In re Gilmore v. Arkansas Board of Registration

381 S.W.3d 860 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 23, 2011

Bd. of Exam’rs v. Carlson, 334 Ark. 614 , 976 S.W.2d 934 (1998). … Agency v. Desiderata, Inc., 331 Ark. 144 , 958 S.W.2d 7 (1998).

Collins v. Arkansas Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

2009 Ark. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 24, 2009

Arkansas Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Reddick, 366 Ark. 89, 92-93 , 233 S.W.3d 639, 642-43 (2006) (citing Ark.Code Ann. § 25-15-212(h) (Repl. 2002)). … Baxter v. Dental Examiners Board, 269 Ark. 67 , 598 S.W.2d 412 (1980); Arkansas State Board of Cosmetology v. Roberts, 28 Ark.App. 249 , 772 S.W.2d 624 (1989). Affirmed. MARSHALL and HENRY, JJ„ agree. 1 .

J. L. Wilson Farms, Inc. v. Wallace

267 Ark. 643 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1979

Appellees were permitted to prove the pilot, Appellant Ned Brown, had not complied with the regulation by obtaining the required Plant Board authorization. … Dunn v. Brimer, 259 Ark. 855 , 537 S.W. 2d 164 . II.

Shatarra Welch v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, and Motel 6

2019 Ark. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 30, 2019

OF REVIEW V. … BROWN, J., dissents. WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge, dissenting.

Teddy Reynolds v. Arkansas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board

2019 Ark. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2019

Dep’t of Corr. v. Bailey, 368 Ark. 518, 247 S.W.3d 851 (2007). … We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the Board. Accordingly, we affirm on this point. V.

Van Curen v. Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board

79 Ark. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 4, 2002

The Board asserts that appellant failed to raise this argument before the Board. We will not decide an argument raised for the first time on appeal. Technical Servs. of Ark., Inc. v. … Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., supra. Appellant argues that the Board’s decision is barred by collateral estoppel.

Charity Tarr, Aprn-Cnp, Dnp v. Arkansas State Board of Nursing

711 S.W.3d 799 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 2, 2025

Brown v. Ark. State Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning, and Refrigeration Licensing Bd., 336 Ark. 34, 40, 984 S.W.2d 402, 405 (1999). … Quoting Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v.

Orintas v. Point Lookout Property Owners Ass'n Board of Directors

476 S.W.3d 174 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 12, 2015

CV-2012-324] V. … In Stoltz v.

Maybelline Co. v. Stiles

10 Ark. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1983

In Brown Jordan v. Dukes, supra, the claimant was denied benefits for alleged misconduct in connection with the work. … See Brown Jordan v. Dukes, supra. See also Mark Smith v. Everett, supra.

Smith v. Everett

6 Ark. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1982

As a part of this decision, we further hold that the Board does not have the jurisdiction to accept additional evidence in appeals pending before it. See Brown Jordan v. … The above provision was quoted in Brown Jordan v.

Kidd v. Clark County Equalization Board

36 Ark. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1991

See also, La Borde v. … And in Swanson v.

Johnson v. State

6 Ark. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 29, 1982

Courts take judicial notice of such rules and regulations of boards and agencies which are adopted pursuant to law. State v. Martin and Lipe, 134 Ark. 420 , 204 S.W. 622 (1918). Seubold v. Ft. … Brown. While it appears that a large part of the evidence was circumstantial, this does not mean that the evidence was not substantial. Rhodes v. State, supra.

Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road PubLic Facility Board

2009 Ark. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 27, 2009

(Roberts), agreed to build and complete a sewer system for appellee Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board (VWR) by April 12, 2005. … V.

Fred Jackson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

2022 Ark. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 2, 2022

OF REVIEW V. … ABRAMSON, Judge Fred Jackson appeals the Arkansas Board of Review’s (the Board’s) decision that was mailed on April 22, 2021.

Robert Ballard v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

625 S.W.3d 249 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 28, 2021

We do not conduct de novo reviews in appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, at 1–2. … Substantial evidence does not support the Board’s conclusion. We reverse and remand for an award of benefits. Reversed and remanded for an award of benefits. VIRDEN and BROWN, JJ., agree.