Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkctapp

5,193 results

0.95s

  • Zepecki v. Arkansas Veterinary Medical Examining Board

    2010 Ark. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 24, 2010

    Arkansas Bd. of Exam’rs v. … In Arkansas State Board of Nursing v. Morrison, 88 Ark.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    6 Ark. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 24, 1982

    The decision of the Board was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Dallas County. … The remoteness of the area is an issue in this case as it was in Copeland v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 4 Ark. App. 143 , 628 S.W.2d 588 (1982).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kasinger v. East End School District ex rel. Board of Directors

    2011 Ark. App. 595 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 5, 2011

    Russell v. Watson Chapel Sch. Dist., 2009 Ark. 79 , 318 S.W.3d 1 ; Moffitt v. Batesville Sch. Dist., 278 Ark. 77 , 643 S.W.2d 557 (1982); Olsen v. East End Sch. Dist., 84 Ark. App. 439 , 143 S.W.3d 576 (2004). … Barnett v. Mountain View Sch. Dist., 2010 Ark. App. 333 , 374 S.W.3d 851 (citing Hagans v. Haines, 64 Ark. App. 158 , 984 S.W.2d 41 (1998)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    534 S.W.3d 754 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 8, 2017

    BOARD OF REVIEW V. … McAteer v. Dir., 2016 Ark. App. 52, at 4, 481 S.W.3d 776, 779; Nibco v. Metcalf, 1 Ark. App. 114, 613 S.W.2d 612 (1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Danny Clark v. Arkansas State Board of Health

    699 S.W.3d 732 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2024

    We do not conduct de novo reviews on appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, at 1, 618 S.W.3d 446, 448. … State Police Comm’n v. Smith, 338 Ark. 354, 994 S.W.2d 456 (1999), we find that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of the Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.

    2013 Ark. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

    BROWN and KAREN Opinion Delivered October 9, 2013 BROWN APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. … Welsher v. Mercy Health Sys., 2012 Ark. App. 394. The burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material fact is upon the moving party. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Everett

    4 Ark. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1982

    In Bockman v. … There is no constitutional objection to this method of proof in administrative hearings, and the Board was not bound by strict rules of evidence. Bockman v. Arkansas State Medical Board, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chandler v. Arkansas Appraisers Licensing & Certification Board

    92 Ark. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 5, 2005

    Nesterenko v. Arkansas Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 76 Ark. App. 561, 566 , 69 S.W.3d 459, 461 (2002). Here, the Board does not set out the facts supporting its conclusion that Chandler violated the Standards. … Hays v. Batesville Mfg. Co., 251 Ark. 659 , 473 S.W.2d 926 (1971); Reddick v. Scott, 217 Ark. 38 , 228 S.W.2d 1008 (1950); Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Hicks, 19 Ark. App. 212 , 718 S.W.2d 488 (1986); Lawrence v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Hawkins

    69 Ark. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2000

    I concur with the majority’s determination with respect to the Board’s findings of fact that appellant is not a licensed architect, that he offered to provide architectural/engineering design services, and that he made a … The record also does not support the Board’s findings that appellant used the tide of architector made an offer to practice architecture.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Emily Best v. Arkansas State Board of Nursing

    2026 Ark. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 14, 2026

    Buhr v. Ark. State Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 261 Ark. 319, 547 S.W.2d 762 (1977). … She also cites and relies on Collie v. Arkansas State Medical Board, 370 Ark. 180, 258 S.W.3d 367 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phipps v. Storey

    269 Ark. 888 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1980

    Schieffler and David Solomon, attorneys for the heirs and executrix of the Broom estate, sending a copy of an assignment by which the lease had been transferred by Phipps to Phipps and Brown, Inc., a corporation. … In Keating v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Bolen v. Washington County Zoning Board of Adjustments

    2011 Ark. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2011

    In PH, LLC v. City of Conway, our supreme court held that zoning decisions by city boards are legislative in nature and a person is not entitled to a de novo circuit court review or a jury trial. … GRUBER and BROWN, JJ„ agree.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Chandler v. Arkansas Appraiser Licensing & Certification Board

    101 Ark. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 12, 2007

    It is the Board that determines the weight to be given to the evidence. McQuay v. Arkansas State Bd. of Architects, 337 Ark. 339 , 989 S.W.2d 499 (1999). … Instead, the focus should be on the Board’s conclusion that Chandler violated the Standards or other Board rules and regulations. See Tomerlin v. Nickolich, 342 Ark. 325 , 27 S.W.3d 746 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hester v. Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board

    2011 Ark. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 25, 2011

    There was substantial evidence before the Board from which the Board could conclude that Hester had knowledge of and authorized V-J.’s actions. … See Collie v. Ark. State Med. Bd., 870 Ark. 180 , 258 S.W.3d 367 (2007); Baxter v. Ark. State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs, 269 Ark. 67 , 598 S.W.2d 412 (1980).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Fort Smith v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Martin Bosco

    704 S.W.3d 143 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2024

    The City also contends that Brewer v. Everett and Leckenby Co., 3 Ark. App. 59, 621 S.W.2d 883 (1981), and Brown Jordan v. Dukes, 269 Ark. 581, 600 S.W.2d 21 (Ark. … Hampton v. Dir., 2023 Ark.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dunn-Wright v. Arkansas State Board of Education

    457 S.W.3d 667 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 4, 2015

    Based on our review, we affirm the State Board’s decision. Review of administrative agency decisions, both by the circuit court and appellate court, are limited in scope. C.C.B. v. Ark. … See Franklin v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 319 Ark. 468, 892 S.W.2d 262 (1995). After Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dellmarie Dawson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    2023 Ark. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 6, 2023

    OF REVIEW V. … Later, Dawson filed an untimely appeal to the Board of Review (Board) from the decision of the Tribunal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bonnie Monk v. Union County Industrial Board

    689 S.W.3d 104 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 1, 2024

    E.g., Bell v. Bell, 2023 Ark. App. 246, 666 S.W.3d 874; see also Glover v. Glover, 2020 Ark. App. 89, 595 S.W.3d 54. … Solis v. State, 371 Ark. 590, 269 S.W.3d 352 (2007); Tharp v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Durkee v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    11 Ark. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1984

    Appellant filed an application with the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board which was denied by the Board’s Director. … Appellant appealed the Board’s order to the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Second Division, which affirmed the Board’s action. We reverse and remand. The circuit court’s decision is clearly erroneous. Ark. Stat.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beavers v. Vaughn

    41 Ark. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1993

    Jones v. Jones, 26 Ark. App. 1 , 759 S.W.2d 42 (1988); Harrison v. Bradford, 9 Ark. App. 156 , 655 S.W.2d 466 (1983). … Jones v. Jones, supra; Cox v. Cox, 17 Ark. App. 95 -A, 705 S.W.2d 902 (1986) (supp. op. on reh’gdenied).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.