Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkctapp

5,193 results

2.16s

  • Dragan Vicentic, Individually and as a Member, Director, and Officer of Green Springs Medical, LLC v. Bruce Simpson

    2021 Ark. App. 106 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2021

    AS A MEMBER, DIRECTOR, AND OFFICER OF APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND GREEN SPRINGS MEDICAL, LLC COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANT [NO. 26CV-19-1211] V. … BROWN, Judge Appellant Dragan Vicentic, individually and as a member, director, and officer of Green Springs Medical, LLC, brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the Garland

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • South Arkansas Developmental Center for Children & Families v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

    99 Ark. App. 260 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 13, 2007

    Appellant appealed the Appeal Tribunal’s decisions to the Board of Review. The Board affirmed the Appeal Tribunal’s denial of appellant’s request to reopen, as well as the grant of unemployment benefits to Parker. … The well-settled standard of review in unemployment cases was set forth in Baldor Electric Co. v. Ark. Employment Sec. Dep’t, 71 Ark.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hanna v. State

    2009 Ark. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 2, 2009

    See Reese v. State, 26 Ark.App. 42 , 759 S.W.2d 576 (1988); Brown v. State, 10 Ark.App. 387 , 664 S.W.2d 507 (1984). … Stinnett v. State, 63 Ark.App. 72 , 973 S.W.2d 826 (1998). The Arkansas Rules of Evidence are not strictly applied in revocation hearings. Tipton v. State, 47 Ark.App. 187 , 887 S.W.2d 540 (1994).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Eubanks v. Daniels

    267 Ark. 888 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 12, 1979

    Haun v. Daniels, Director of Labor, 266 Ark. 146 (Ct. App. 1979); Terry Dairy Products Company, Inc. v. Cash, Commissioner of Labor, 224 Ark. 576 , 275 S.W. 2d 12 (1955). … The decision of the Board of Review is AFFIRMED. Howard and Newbern, JJ., dissent. David Newbern, Judge.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stephanie Byrams v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child

    2025 Ark. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2025

    Ussery v. Ark. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2022 Ark. … The three-week supervised visitation in Byrams’s home caused MC to regress “across the board.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael Bull v. State of Arkansas

    2025 Ark. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 7, 2025

    Rhoades v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 730, 379 S.W.3d 659. Evidence that is insufficient for a criminal conviction may be sufficient for a probation or suspended-sentence revocation. Bradley v. … Springs v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 364, 525 S.W.3d 490. Accordingly, we need not address Michael’s other arguments for reversal and affirm. Affirmed. HIXSON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department

    61 Ark. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 25, 1998

    However, there is no need to file such a motion in Employment Security cases; the decision of the Board of Review in this case was affirmed without opinion on March 18, 1998, pursuant to Rule 5-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme … This court does not consider additional evidence filed except as ordered by this court and directed to the Board of Review pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529 (c)(2)(A) (Repl. 1997). See also Fry v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Horton v. Taylor

    2012 Ark. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 12, 2012

    (Stella Mason’s niece), Donald Brown (Rita Brown’s husband), Jim Taylor, Russell Podgorney (a survey- or), Duford, Jeff Magness (who performed dozing work for the Hortons), Leroy Mclnturff (who helped clear the Mason property … See Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ellison, 384 Ark. 357 , 974 S.W.2d 464 (1998); Watkins v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc., 2012 Ark. App. 301 , 420 S.W.3d 477 ; Crum v. Craig, 2010 Ark.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Alyssia Kirby-Snow v. State of Arkansas

    609 S.W.3d 686 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 21, 2020

    See, e.g., London v. … SWITZER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Hancock Law Firm, by: Charles D. Hancock, for appellant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rebecca Nichols v. James Swindoll and Chuck Gibson

    2022 Ark. App. 399 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 5, 2022

    See Nichols v. Swindoll, 2022 Ark. App. 233. … ABRAMSON, WHITEAKER, and BROWN, JJ., agree. HARRISON, C.J., and HIXSON, J., dissent. GRUBER, J., not participating. 3

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cox v. State

    2016 Ark. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 7, 2016

    CR-13-1377-6] V. … BROWN, Judge Appellant Andrew Cox pled guilty to battery in the first degree in August 2014, and he was sentenced to three years’ probation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Spencer Adam Boothe v. State of Arkansas

    598 S.W.3d 546 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 18, 2020

    Buckley v. State, 349 Ark. 53, 76 S.W.3d 825 (2002). … See Cousins v. State, 82 Ark.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Straub v. State

    577 S.W.3d 776 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 29, 2019

    Brown v. State , 2016 Ark. App. 403 , 500 S.W.3d 781 . Also, the State argues that we need not address the merits of Straub's argument because he does not challenge the failure-to-report basis, but we disagree. … Id. at 4, 561 S.W.3d at 746 ; see also Hanna v. State , 2009 Ark. App. 809 , at 5, 372 S.W.3d 375 , 379 (citing Brown v. State , 10 Ark. App. 387 , at 389, 664 S.W.2d 507 , 508 (1984) ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Graham v. Turnage Employment Group

    60 Ark. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1998

    The issues are identical to those raised in Brown v. Alabama Electric Co., 60 Ark. App. 138 , 959 S.W.2d 753 (1998), which we also decide today. We affirm, addressing the issues as appellant presents them. I. … As we said today in Brown v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Joe Morris v. State of Arkansas

    2025 Ark. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 2025

    See Morris v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 365, ___S.W.3d ___. Because the issue on appeal and argument presented here are identical to those presented in the companion case, it is unnecessary to restate them. … WOOD and BROWN, JJ., agree. Dusti Standridge, for appellant. Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: James Hill, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 2

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benjamin Vestal v. State of Arkansas

    2022 Ark. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 26, 2022

    BROWN, Judge This is a consolidated appeal of two separate cases involving appellant Benjamin Vestal. … P. 33.1(c). 7 Taylor v. State, 2022 Ark.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Siloam Springs v. La-De, LLC

    456 S.W.3d 787 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 25, 2015

    City of Little Rock v. Carpenter, 374 Ark. 511, 516–17, 288 S.W.3d 647, 651 (2008) (citing Harris v. … Harrington, Miller, Kieklak, Eichmann & Brown, P.A., by: J. Greg Brown, for appellant.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Benjamin Vestal v. State of Arkansas

    2022 Ark. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 26, 2022

    BROWN, Judge This is a consolidated appeal of two separate cases involving appellant Benjamin Vestal. … P. 33.1(c). 7 Taylor v. State, 2022 Ark.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hollins v. State

    80 Ark. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 29, 2003

    Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 308, 316-17 , 65 S.W.3d 394, 399-400 (2001). In Brown, the court held that a double-jeopardy motion made in the form of a directed-verdict motion was premature. … See Dixon v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Metcalf v. Texarkana School District

    66 Ark. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1999

    The circuit judge held that the Arkansas Supreme Court case of McCaskill v. … See Conway v. State, 62 Ark. App. 125 , 969 S.W.2d 669 (1998); Nelson v. Timberline Intl., Inc., 57 Ark. App. 34 , 942 S.W.2d 260 (1997); Cheshire v. Foam Molding Co., 37 Ark. App. 78 , 822 S.W.2d 412 (1992); Myles v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.