Case law

Daniels v. Commercial Union Insurance

5 Ark. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 26, 1982

Corp. v. … Summerville, 205 Ark. 463 , 169 S.W.2d 579 (1943); Blankinship Logging Co. v. Brown, 212 Ark. 871 , 208 S.W.2d 778 (1948); O’Meara v. Beasley, supra. As was stated by the court in Blankinship Logging Co. v.

William Durden v. City of Van Buren

635 S.W.3d 342 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2021

Crockett v. … GLADWIN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Wallace, Martin, Duke, and Russell, PLLC, by: Valerie L. Goudie, for appellant. Harrington, Miller, Kieklak, Eichmann & Brown, P.A., by: Thomas N. Kieklak and R.

Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas

2023 Ark. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 12, 2023

Perez v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 561, at 1–2; Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 4(a)); see also Lacy v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 509. … VIRDEN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Erin W. Lewis, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 2

William Angel, Patricia Belk, Dorothy Brown, Robert Brown, Anthony Buggs, Jean Carter, Alberta Cartwright, Eugene Cartwright, Frances Louise Crawford, Beatrice Eaton, Queen Ester Ross, Pearlie Franklin, Rosetta Fuller, Verna Hickey, Barbara Marshall, Shamekia Marshall, Nathaniel Martin, Linda Sanders, Bobby Lee Smith, Felisa Stokes, Kattie Mae Taylor, Fannie Lee Washington, Martha Washington, Gloria Webster, and Claude Wilborn v. Helena Renaissance 1, L.P. Pioneer Property Management, Inc. Gail Wade And Cornelius Borum

669 S.W.3d 594 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 24, 2023

CV-20-628 WILLIAM ANGEL, PATRICIA BELK, Opinion Delivered May 24, 2023 DOROTHY BROWN, ROBERT BROWN, ANTHONY BUGGS, JEAN APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS CARTER, ALBERTA CARTWRIGHT, … and Pearlie Franklin Brown.

Terry v. Director of Labor

3 Ark. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1981

The Board of Review affirmed that decision. We reverse. 1 Appellant was employed by Feather-Lite Manufacturing Company for over 14 years prior to his separation on September 26, 1980. … We believe the case of Jackson v. Daniels, 267 Ark. 685 , 590 S.W. 2d 63 (1979) to be controlling.

Janice Johnson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

645 S.W.3d 352 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 11, 2022

OF REVIEW [NO. 2021-BR-00809] V. … We do not conduct de novo reviews in appeals from the Board. Keener v. Dir., 2021 Ark. App. 88, 618 S.W.3d 446.

Barber v. State

2010 Ark. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2010

In Wilson v. … Barber cites Wong Sun v.

Stacy Anthony Mitchell v. State of Arkansas

653 S.W.3d 550 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 26, 2022

Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 308, 65 S.W.3d 394 (2001). Moreover, expert medical testimony is not required to prove serious physical injury. Johnson v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 71, 510 S.W.3d 298. … ABRAMSON and BROWN, JJ., agree. James Law Firm, by: William O. “Bill” James, Jr., and Scott J. Kadien, for appellant.

Haywood v. Everett

5 Ark. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 26, 1982

In Loftin v. Daniels, 268 Ark. 611 , 594 S.W.2d 578 (Ark. App. 1980), the claimants were also employees of a Headstart Program and were laid off without pay for the summer recess. … The decision of the Board of Review is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Board of Review to determine whether the claimants are otherwise eligible for unemployment benefits. Glaze, J., would award benefits.

Caffey v. State

43 Ark. App. 160 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1993

Mosley v. State, 22 Ark. App. 29 , 732 S.W.2d 861 (1987). Substantial compliance with these regulations is sufficient, Goode v. … Smith v. State, 243 Ark. 12 , 418 S.W.2d 627 (1967); Jones v. City of Forrest City, 239 Ark. 211 , 388 S.W.2d 386 (1965).

Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & Organ

58 Ark. App. 194 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1997

Further, our recent opinion in Baysinger v. Air Systems, Inc., 55 Ark. … Henson v. Fleet Mortg. Co., 319 Ark. 491 , 892 S.W.2d 250 (1995).

Rachel Hourston v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

2022 Ark. App. 141 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 30, 2022

Hourston argues that there was not substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision. We disagree and affirm. Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. McPherson v. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark. App. 171, 517 S.W.3d 427.

Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 9, 2020

See Dees v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 85. … HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree. Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant. One brief only. 2

Ian Baylee Moytoy v. State of Arkansas

2021 Ark. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 14, 2021

See Webb v. … Brown v. State, 2015 Ark. 97, at 2. The verification requirement for a postconviction petition is of substantive importance to prevent perjury. Id.

Progressive Eldercare Svcs.-Saline, Inc. v. Garrett

2016 Ark. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 2, 2016

For the reasons stated in Progressive Eldercare Services-Saline, Inc. v. Cauffiel, 2016 Ark. App. 523, ___ S.W.3d ___, handed down today, we affirm. Affirmed. … GRUBER, VAUGHT, HIXSON, and BROWN, JJ., agree. HARRISON, J., concurs. BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge, concurring.

Ketcher v. Mayor of North Little Rock

2 Ark. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 1981

When the Board of Improvement created by the North Little Rock City Council proceeds to ascertain the needs of the District and the City Council then appoints members of the Board of Assessment, the-Board of Assessment can … In Lester v. Walker et al, 177 Ark. 1097 , 9 S.W. 2d 323 (1928), it was held that when land is dedicated, “the revocation may be accompanied by an affirmative act in recalling it, or by abandonment ...” In Mebane v.

Matthew Forrest v. Allyssa Thomlinson

2024 Ark. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 14, 2024

Because the adoption decision is reversed in Forrest v. Fleming, 2024 Ark. … ABRAMSON, VIRDEN, GLADWIN, and BROWN, JJ., agree. HARRISON, C.J., and KLAPPENBACH, GRUBER, and THYER, JJ., dissent. BRANDON J. HARRISON, Chief Judge, dissenting. Because I dissent in Forrest v.

Christopher S. Holloway v. Tori D. Holloway

2019 Ark. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2019

–Civ. 4(b)(2). 3 Kelly v. Kelly, 2014 Ark. 543, 453 S.W.3d 655. 4 McKay v. McKay, 340 Ark. 171, 8 S.W.3d 525 (2000). 5 Jones v. … App. 269, 139 S.W.3d 150 (2003). 9 Browning v. Browning, 2015 Ark.

Paula Pendarvis v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2022 Ark. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 19, 2022

OF REVIEW V. … Because Pendarvis has now received from the Board the relief she originally requested in her appeal to this court, her appeal is moot. See Honeycutt v. Foster, 371 Ark. 545, 268 S.W.3d 875 (2007).

Missouri v. Director, Employment Security Department & Lamb & Associates

84 Ark. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 10, 2003

The Board found that appellant should be denied benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § ll-10-513(a). The Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Bradford v. … Even when there is evidence upon which the Board might have reached a different decision, the scope of judicial review is limited to a determination of whether the Board could reasonably reach its decision upon the evidence