Case law

Simpson v. Simpson

2013 Ark. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

PR-10-131] APPELLANT HONORABLE PAMELA V. … BROWN, Judge Appellant Timothy Roger Simpson, as the personal representative of the Estate of Edith Laverne Simpson, deceased, appeals the September 5, 2012 order of the Craighead Circuit Court setting aside

Scott Dewayne Brookshire v. State of Arkansas

633 S.W.3d 782 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 1, 2021

See Brown v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 403, 500 S.W.3d 781; Webb v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 257, 460 S.W.3d 820. IV. … Brown v. State, 2010 Ark. 420, 378 S.W.3d 66. If a sentence is within the limits set by the legislature, the appellate court is not at liberty to reduce it. Williams v.

Dendy v. State

93 Ark. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2005

See id.; State v. Brown, 356 Ark. 460 , 156 S.W.3d 722 (2004). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975).

Morris v. Medin

43 Ark. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1993

This appeal concerns the process to be used in the election of the Board of Directors of the Bella Vista Property Owners Association (POA). … The appellants argue that this issue was previously litigated in Buck v. Medin, No.

Tate v. State, opinion

2015 Ark. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 11, 2015

King v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 81, 432 S.W.3d 127. … The Arkansas Supreme Court held in State v. Brown that homeowners must not only give consent to search, they must be informed of their right to refuse consent to search. 356 Ark. 460, 156 S.W.3d 722 (2004).

Wilson v. Wilson

492 S.W.3d 534 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 11, 2016

See Brown v. Brown, 2016 Ark. App. 172. … Powell v. Powell, 82 Ark.

Sheets v. Dollarway School District

82 Ark. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 18, 2003

Dist. v. Strain, 288 Ark. 507 , 707 S.W.2d 306 (1986). … Appellant testified that he did not request a hearing before the board after receiving that letter because the board had already decided not to renew his contract. In Western Grove Sch. Dist. v.

Roy Videl Graham v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 15, 2020

Brown v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 325. To revoke a probationary sentence, the State has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a condition of the probationary sentence was violated. Id. at 4. … Brown v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 367, 553 S.W.3d 787. Pursuant to Anders, supra, we are required to determine whether the case is wholly frivolous after a full examination of all the proceedings. T.S. v.

Jones v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

570 S.W.3d 471 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 16, 2019

See McPherson v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. , 2013 Ark. App. 238 , 2013 WL 1682633 . … Glover and Brown, JJ., agree. Jones's date of birth is August 6, 1992.

Cox v. State

2017 Ark. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 1, 2017

BROWN, Judge Appellant Andrew Cox pled guilty to battery in the first degree in August 2014, and he was sentenced to three years’ probation. … Cox v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 387.  Cite as 2017 Ark.

Lagios v. Goldman

463 S.W.3d 726 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 20, 2015

Swaffar v. Swaffar, 309 Ark. 73 , 827 S.W.2d 140 (1992). However, case law has also held that substantial compliance is sufficient. Martin v. Martin, 316 Ark. 765 , 875 S.W.2d 819 (1994); Reid v. Frazee, 72 Ark. … Brown, J., agrees. . We remanded to settle and supplement the record and ordered rebriefing in Lagios v. Goldman, 2014 Ark. App. 640 , 2014 WL 5849229 .

Haywood v. Everett

5 Ark. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 26, 1982

In Loftin v. Daniels, 268 Ark. 611 , 594 S.W.2d 578 (Ark. App. 1980), the claimants were also employees of a Headstart Program and were laid off without pay for the summer recess. … The decision of the Board of Review is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Board of Review to determine whether the claimants are otherwise eligible for unemployment benefits. Glaze, J., would award benefits.

Vega v. State

521 S.W.3d 507 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2017

Stewart v. State, 88 Ark. App. 110, 195 S.W.3d 385 (2004). … KLAPPENBACH and BROWN, JJ., agree. The Burns Law Firm, PLLC, by: Jack D. Burns and Meagan Burns, for appellant.

Hobbs v. State

2013 Ark. App. 567 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 9, 2013

CR-2009-67] V. HONORABLE DAVID G. … Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904 (1994).

William Durden v. City of Van Buren

635 S.W.3d 342 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2021

Crockett v. … GLADWIN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Wallace, Martin, Duke, and Russell, PLLC, by: Valerie L. Goudie, for appellant. Harrington, Miller, Kieklak, Eichmann & Brown, P.A., by: Thomas N. Kieklak and R.

Blalock v. Blalock

2013 Ark. App. 659 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 6, 2013

Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333, 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008). I. … Harvey v. Harvey, 295 Ark. 102, 747 S.W.2d 89 (1988).

William Angel, Patricia Belk, Dorothy Brown, Robert Brown, Anthony Buggs, Jean Carter, Alberta Cartwright, Eugene Cartwright, Frances Louise Crawford, Beatrice Eaton, Queen Ester Ross, Pearlie Franklin, Rosetta Fuller, Verna Hickey, Barbara Marshall, Shamekia Marshall, Nathaniel Martin, Linda Sanders, Bobby Lee Smith, Felisa Stokes, Kattie Mae Taylor, Fannie Lee Washington, Martha Washington, Gloria Webster, and Claude Wilborn v. Helena Renaissance 1, L.P. Pioneer Property Management, Inc. Gail Wade And Cornelius Borum

669 S.W.3d 594 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 24, 2023

CV-20-628 WILLIAM ANGEL, PATRICIA BELK, Opinion Delivered May 24, 2023 DOROTHY BROWN, ROBERT BROWN, ANTHONY BUGGS, JEAN APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS CARTER, ALBERTA CARTWRIGHT, … and Pearlie Franklin Brown.

T.S. v. State

2017 Ark. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 21, 2017

Pursuant to Anders v. … Wells v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 151, at 3. Rebriefing ordered; motion to withdraw denied. HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree. Ebony Gulley, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

Sanders v. Daniels

269 Ark. 672 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 28, 1980

In Harris v. … As there is substantial evidence to support the findings and decision of the Board of Review we must affirm. Harris v. Daniels, supra.

Missouri v. Director, Employment Security Department & Lamb & Associates

84 Ark. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 10, 2003

The Board found that appellant should be denied benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § ll-10-513(a). The Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Bradford v. … Even when there is evidence upon which the Board might have reached a different decision, the scope of judicial review is limited to a determination of whether the Board could reasonably reach its decision upon the evidence