Case law

Hodges v. Everett

2 Ark. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1981

The decision of the Board of Review is reversed. … Stagecoach Motel v. Krause, 267 Ark. 1093 , 593 S.W. 2d 495 (1980).

Tommy Conder and Conder Cattle Company, LLC v. Janet Conder and Chad Conder

2024 Ark. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2024

Parkerson v. Brown, 2010 Ark. App. 505, at 5, 379 S.W.3d 485, 488. The question here is not necessarily about the legitimacy of the appellants’ alleged interests but rather when they chose to assert it. … See, e.g., Kelly v. Est. of Edwards, 2009 Ark. 78, 312 S.W.3d 316; Ballard v. Garrett, 349 Ark. 371, 78 S.W.3d 73 (2002). Affirmed. KLAPPENBACH and BROWN, JJ., agree. Brett D.

McWilliams v. Schmidt

76 Ark. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 5, 2001

That all pertinent facts and papers, including deeds and surveys, regarding ownership of the disputed property were disclosed to High [sic] Brown. … Schmidt, Johnny Melvin Schmidt, Edward Gangluff, Margaret Gangluff, David Gangluff and myself by Hugh Brown, attorney of record. 5.

Gatewood v. Little Rock Public Schools

2 Ark. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1981

Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58 , 576 S.W. 2d 705 . … In Weston v. State, supra, the court stated: Rule 9 does not exist as a snare for unwitting litigants or for those who appear before the Court, pro se.

Clark v. Director, Employment Security Department

58 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1997

On appeal, the Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Rucker v. Director, 52 Ark. App. 126 , 915 S.W.2d 315 (1996). … As we pointed out in Perry v. Gaddy, 48 Ark.

Swinford v. State

85 Ark. App. 326 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 10, 2004

Brown v. State, 82 Ark.App. 61 , 110 S.W.3d 293 (2003). In King v. … The appellant, Henderson, and his accomplice, Brown, were arrested.

Jefferson-Lincoln County Circuit Court v. Director, Department of Workforce Services Employer Contributions Unit

469 S.W.3d 817 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 2015

OF REVIEW APPELLANT [No. 2014-EC-22] V. … Code Ann. § 11-10-308 (d).1 On appeal, the findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Barb’s 3-D Demo Serv. v. Dir., 69 Ark.

Nirvana Med Spa v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2024 Ark. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 1, 2024

OF REVIEW V. … IHOP #1914 v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 102.

Canada v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

528 S.W.3d 874 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 27, 2017

Brown v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2015 Ark. App. 725, at 4, 478 S.W.3d 272, 275. Credibility determinations are left to the fact-finder. Henson v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2014 Ark. … WHITEAKER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Tabitha McNulty, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant. Jerald A.

Rigsby v. State

577 S.W.3d 453 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 22, 2019

Brown v. State , 2018 Ark. App. 367 , 553 S.W.3d 787 . Pursuant to Anders , we are required to determine whether the case is wholly frivolous after a full examination of all the proceedings. T.S. v. State , 2017 Ark. … Virden and Brown, JJ., agree.

Martin v. State

46 Ark. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1994

Rhodes v. State, 276 Ark. 203 , 634 S.W.2d 107 (1982). … Brown v. State, 316 Ark. 724 , 875 S.W.2d 828 (1994), and see Brown v. State, 315 Ark. 466 , 869 S.W.2d 9 (1994). For these reasons, we do not address the sufficiency argument on appeal.

Hargrove v. Hargrove

453 S.W.3d 683 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 28, 2015

See Wright v. Wright, 29 Ark. App. 20, 779 S.W.2d 183 (1989). … See, e.g., Jones v. Jones, 2014 Ark. 96, 432 S.W.3d 36; Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333, 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008); Farrell v. Farrell, 365 Ark. 465, 231 S.W.3d 619 (2006); Box v. Box, 312 Ark. 550, 851 S.W.2d 437 (1993).

Hopkins v. Stiles

10 Ark. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 1983

The Supreme Court of Nebraska in Gilbert v. … Board of Review v.

City of Fayetteville v. Daniels

1 Ark. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1981

In Harris v. … Our only concern on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the findings of the Board of Review. Allied Telephone Company v. Rhodes, 248 Ark. 677 , 454 S.W. 2d 93 (1970); Clark v.

Morrow Cash Heating & Air, Inc. v. Jackson

96 Ark. App. 105 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 13, 2006

Ragar v. Brown, 332 Ark. 214 , 964 S.W.2d 372 (1998). … Moix-McNutt v. Brown 348 Ark. 518, 523 , 74 S.W.3d 612, 614 (2002).

Boen v. State

2009 Ark. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 1, 2009

Boen’s lawyer has filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k)(1). … E.g., Brady v. State, 346 Ark. 298, 302 , 57 S.W.3d 691, 694 (2001); Brown v. State, 85 Ark.App. 382, 393-94 , 155 S.W.3d 22, 29 (2004). Boen’s attorney missed two adverse rulings.

Pulaski County Special School District; Charles McNulty, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Pulaski County Special School District and Custodian of Certain Records; And Valerie Bailey, in Her Official Capacity as Public Information Specialist v. Russell R. Racop

2026 Ark. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 8, 2026

State Police v. Wren, 2 2016 Ark. 188, 491 S.W.3d 124; Pulaski Cnty. v. Ark. Democrat-Gazette, Inc., 370 Ark. 435, 260 S.W.3d 718 (2007); Young v. … See Hyman v. Sadler, 2018 Ark. App. 82, 539 S.W.3d 642; Thomas v. Hall, 2012 Ark. 66, 399 S.W.3d 387; Stilley v. McBride, 332 Ark. 306, 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998).

Gikonyo v. State

102 Ark. App. 223 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2008

Brown v. State, 60 Ark. App. 215 , 991 S.W.2d 137 (1999). Once an expert is qualified, any lack of foundation for the expert’s opinion goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility. See, e.g., Sera v. … Dowty v. State, 363 Ark. 1 , 210 S.W.3d 850 (2005); Standridge v.

Postoak v. Bassett

547 S.W.3d 100 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 7, 2018

Moody v. Dir. , 2014 Ark. App. 137 , at 6, 432 S.W.3d 157 , 160. … On appeal, we review the findings of the Board and affirm if they are supported by substantial evidence. Bergman v. Dir. , 2010 Ark. App. 729 , at 5, 379 S.W.3d 625 , 628.

Cusack v. Williams

103 Ark. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2008

Cusack’s actions constituted misconduct in connection with his work was a fact question for the Board to answer. Terravista Landscape v. Williams, 88 Ark. App. 57, 64 , 194 S.W.3d 800, 804 (2004). … Rucker v. Price, 52 Ark. App. 126, 130 , 915 S.W.2d 315, 317 (1996).