Case law

Ontaria Jackson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

683 S.W.3d 218 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 24, 2024

Standard of Review Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 205, 575 S.W.3d 186. … However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark.

Alexander v. Walnut Fork Design

267 Ark. 1130 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 23, 1980

On the contrary, we find substantial evidence to support the decision of the Board of Review and, accordingly, must affirm its holding on appeal. Terry Dairy Products Company, Inc. v. … From the facts before us, we must affirm the decision of the Board of Review.

Crenshaw v. Arkansas Warehouse, Inc.

2010 Ark. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 22, 2010

In Gann v. … Compare Browning v. Browning, 319 Ark. 205 , 890 S.W.2d 273 (1995). For these reasons, I concur.

Livingston v. State

2017 Ark. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 18, 2017

See Wright v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 300, at 1–2; Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904 (1994). … GLOVER and BROWN, JJ., agree. N. Mark Kappenbach, for appellant. No response. 2

Ashlock v. State

64 Ark. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1998

Johnson v. State, 325 Ark. 197 , 926 S.W.2d 837 (1996). Here, Ashlock argues that Officer Brown’s testimony was prohibited by Rule 404 and that an admonition was insufficient. … In Johnson v.

Teague v. Dir.

577 S.W.3d 457 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 22, 2019

The Board affirmed and adopted the Appeal Tribunal's decision; therefore, the Appeal Tribunal decision becomes the decision of the Board for purposes of appellate review. Law Offices of Craig L. Cook v. Dir., 2013 Ark. … Board decisions are upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. Blanton v. Dir. , 2019 Ark. App. 205 .

Peterson v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

90 Ark. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 16, 2005

The Board of Review affirmed. … We agree, and therefore we reverse and dismiss the Board’s decision. On appeal, the Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Trigg v. Dir. Emp. Sec. Dep’t, 72 Ark.

Skomp v. State

2010 Ark. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 5, 2010

He had taken possession of the evidence that Chapman had obtained, which Hil-dreth described as a one-foot long wooden board and a brown leather belt with no buckle. … Kelley v. State, 103 Ark. App. 110 , 286 S.W.3d 746 (2008).

Caldwell v. State

2009 Ark. App. 526 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 1, 2009

See also Eads v. State, 74 Ark.App. 363 , 47 S.W.3d 918 (2001). It is imperative that counsel follow the appropriate procedure when filing a motion to withdraw as counsel. Brown v. … GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Grant v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 23, 2014

Smith v. Director, 2013 Ark. App. 360. … Whether an employee’s actions constitute misconduct in connection with the work sufficient to deny unemployment benefits is a question of fact for the Board. Johnson v. Director, 84 Ark.

Lentz Carrier Co., LLC v. Smith

2017 Ark. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2017

G501602, G505365] V. … HIXSON and BROWN, JJ., agree. Mayton, Newkirk & Jones, by: David C. Jones, for appellants Lentz Carrier Co., LLC, and Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. Hart Law Firm, LLP, by: Neal L.

Jackson v. State

47 Ark. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 19, 1994

Brown testified that she analyzed one tablet she received from Officer Gann and found it to be a controlled substance. … Brown v. State, 35 Ark. App. 156 , 814 S.W.2d 918 (1991). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we find there is sufficient evidence to support the appellant’s conviction.

Blackwell v. Brown's Moving & Storage, Inc.

502 S.W.3d 534 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 28, 2016

HONORABLE MARY SPENCER BROWN’S MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. … Farrell v. Farrell, 359 Ark. 1, 193 S.W.3d 734 (2004). It is abundantly clear that the June 19 order is not final for appellate purposes.

Craig v. Craig

2010 Ark. App. 718 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 27, 2010

See Brown v. Brown, 76 Ark.App. 494 , 68 S.W.3d 316 (2002); Weir v. Phillips, 75 Ark.App. 208 , 55 S.W.3d 804 (2001). … See Davis v. Davis, 79 Ark.App. 178 , 84 S.W.3d 447 (2002); Cochran v. Cochran, 7 Ark.App. 146 , 644 S.W.2d 635 (1983).

Tommy Conder and Conder Cattle Company, LLC v. Janet Conder and Chad Conder

2024 Ark. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2024

Parkerson v. Brown, 2010 Ark. App. 505, at 5, 379 S.W.3d 485, 488. The question here is not necessarily about the legitimacy of the appellants’ alleged interests but rather when they chose to assert it. … See, e.g., Kelly v. Est. of Edwards, 2009 Ark. 78, 312 S.W.3d 316; Ballard v. Garrett, 349 Ark. 371, 78 S.W.3d 73 (2002). Affirmed. KLAPPENBACH and BROWN, JJ., agree. Brett D.

Jefferson-Lincoln County Circuit Court v. Director, Department of Workforce Services Employer Contributions Unit

469 S.W.3d 817 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 16, 2015

OF REVIEW APPELLANT [No. 2014-EC-22] V. … Code Ann. § 11-10-308 (d).1 On appeal, the findings of the Board of Review are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Barb’s 3-D Demo Serv. v. Dir., 69 Ark.

Clark v. Director, Employment Security Department

58 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1997

On appeal, the Board of Review’s findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence. Rucker v. Director, 52 Ark. App. 126 , 915 S.W.2d 315 (1996). … As we pointed out in Perry v. Gaddy, 48 Ark.

Von Holt v. State

2009 Ark. App. 544 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jul 1, 2009

BROWN, Judge. liThis is a no-merit appeal from the revocation of appellant Frankie Von Holt’s suspended sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. … See generally Brown v. State, 85 Ark.App. 382 , 155 S.W.3d 22 (2004) (citing Barbee v. State, 346 Ark. 185 , 56 S.W.3d 370 (2001)).

Pulaski County Special School District; Charles McNulty, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Pulaski County Special School District and Custodian of Certain Records; And Valerie Bailey, in Her Official Capacity as Public Information Specialist v. Russell R. Racop

2026 Ark. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 8, 2026

State Police v. Wren, 2 2016 Ark. 188, 491 S.W.3d 124; Pulaski Cnty. v. Ark. Democrat-Gazette, Inc., 370 Ark. 435, 260 S.W.3d 718 (2007); Young v. … See Hyman v. Sadler, 2018 Ark. App. 82, 539 S.W.3d 642; Thomas v. Hall, 2012 Ark. 66, 399 S.W.3d 387; Stilley v. McBride, 332 Ark. 306, 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998).

Nirvana Med Spa v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2024 Ark. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 1, 2024

OF REVIEW V. … IHOP #1914 v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 102.