Case law

Rainbolt v. Everett

3 Ark. App. 48 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1981

That decision was affirmed by the Appeals Tribunal and also affirmed by the Board of Review. … In Foote’s Dixie Dandy, Inc. v.

Michael Nellums v. Pine Bluff School District

707 S.W.3d 496 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 19, 2025

State Univ. v. Pro. … Dep’t of Corr. v. Shults, 2018 Ark. 94, 541 S.W.3d 410; Scoggins v.

Walker v. Dir.

2014 Ark. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2014

WALKER Opinion Delivered December 3, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS V. … We reverse and remand because the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. The facts in this case are very similar to those found in McDaniel v.

Michael Jones v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

668 S.W.3d 189 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 3, 2023

V. … On appeal, we review the findings of the Board in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, reversing only when the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Davis v. Dir., 2013 Ark.

Milner v. Daniels

269 Ark. 762 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1980

See also, Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 383 A. 2d 345 (D.C. 1978); Barnett v. Commonwealth of Penn. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 408 A. 2d 195 (Pa. 1979); Demech v. … Board of Review, 167 N.J. Super. 35 , 400 A. 2d 502 (1979). In its decision approving the determination made by the referee, there is no discussion by the board of review of the facts in this case.

Mytear Berkhalter v. Director, Division of Workforce Services And Arkansas Building Services, LLC

2024 Ark. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 21, 2024

OF REVIEW [NO. 2022-BR-01225] V. … We remand this case to the Board to settle and supplement the record. See Robinson v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 585. Remanded to settle and supplement the record. GLADWIN and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

Leatherwood v. State

69 Ark. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 1, 2000

Stewart v. State, 338 Ark. 608 , 999 S.W.2d 684 (1999). On April 1, 1997, the appellant’s wife called the police advising them that the appellant “pulled” a 30-06 on her. Mr. … Brown: Your Honor, I have some specific objections. If I may approach. THE COURT: All right, what are your objections? Mr. Brown: Your Honor, to all the pages that I’ve certified, Your Honor.

Lamar Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department

2011 Ark. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 16, 2011

Co. v. Department of Public Works, 289 Mass. 149 , 193 N.E. 799 (1935). Board of Adjustment v. Osage Oil & Transp., Inc., 258 Ark. 91, 94 , 522 S.W.2d 836, 838 (1975); see also Donrey Comme’ns Co. v. … GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree. . Section 750.707(c) reads as follows: (c) Grandfather clause.

Exson v. Everett

9 Ark. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 14, 1983

Brewer v. Everett, 3 Ark. App. 59 , 621 S.W.2d 883 (1981); Stagecoach Motel v. Krause, 267 Ark. 1093 , 593 S.W.2d 495 (Ark. App. 1980). In Willis Johnson Co. v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 795 , 601 S.W.2d 890 (Ark. … On appeal, this Court is required to review the evidence in the light most favorable to the decision reached by the Board of Review and to affirm the decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Harris v.

Brannan v. Everett

5 Ark. App. 271 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1982

In the first appeal, Brannan v. Everett, et al, No. … In Johnson v. Coleman, 4 Ark.

Mullinax v. State

53 Ark. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 1, 1996

The Supreme Court determined that the balancing analysis in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979), and United States v. … See Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, supra; Brown v. Texas, supra; Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979); United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, supra; and United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975).

Tate v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

100 Ark. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 5, 2007

Whether Tate’s actions constituted misconduct in connection with her work was a fact question for the Board to answer. Terravista Landscape v. Williams, 88 Ark. App. 57, 64 , 194 S.W.3d 800, 804 (2004). … The question for this court is whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Ibid. It does.

Ittle Rock Plastic Surgery, P.A. v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Bathsheba McCall

2026 Ark. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 21, 2026

BOARD OF REVIEW APPELLANT V. … CFO Network, LLC v. Dir., 2023 Ark. App. 303; see also IHOP #1914 v. Dir., 2023 Ark.

Gilder v. Cedar Ridge Farms LTD

2013 Ark. App. 544 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2013

CV-2010-701] V. HONORABLE JOHN PLEGGE, JUDGE CEDAR RIDGE FARMS, LTD. … WYNNE and BROWN, JJ., agree. The Law Offices of Thomas Burns, P.A., by: Thomas Burns, for appellants. Baxter Law Firm, by: Ray Baxter, for appellees. 2

Dray v. Director, Employment Security Department

55 Ark. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1996

On appeal, we review the findings of fact of the Board of Review in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, only reversing where the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Roberson v. … Baker v. Director of Labor, 39 Ark. App. 5 , 832 S.W.2d 864 (1992); Feagin v. Everett, Director, 9 Ark. App. 59 , 652 S.W.2d 839 (1983); Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-515 (b) (1987).

Strother v. LaCroix Optical

2013 Ark. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2013

F406963] V. … BROWN, Judge Appellant appeals from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) reversal of the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) finding that appellant was permanently and totally disabled.

Loftin v. Daniels

268 Ark. 611 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1980

Terry Dairy Products Company, Inc. v. Carsh, Commissioner of Labor, 224 Ark. 576 (Ark. App. 1979). … On the basis of the evidence we are unable to say that the determination of the board of Review is not supported by substantial evidence.

Davis v. State

493 S.W.3d 339 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 18, 2016

Gikonyo v. State, 102 Ark. App. 223, 283 S.W.3d 631 (2008); Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). … Brown v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 873. The crimes of which appellant was convicted are defined in our criminal code.

Moore v. King

56 Ark. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1997

First National Bank v. Arkansas State Bank Comm’r, 301 Ark. 1 , 781 S.W.2d 744 (1989). … See Hosey v. Burgess, 319 Ark. 183 , 890 S.W.2d 262 (1995).

Dangelo v. Neil

10 Ark. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 7, 1983

Brown v. Brown, 233 Ark. 422 , 345 S.W.2d 27 (1961). … Pender v. McKee, supra.