Case law

Carl Rorie v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. App. 106 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 14, 2024

Officer Starnes told Donnie Brown, who answered the door, that he was looking for Rorie, and Brown took him to Rorie’s bedroom. … See Hill v. State, 65 Ark.

Ham v. Daniels

270 Ark. 961 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1980

Because of the abbreviated nature of the board of review opinion, we are unable to tell the extent to which the letters were considered by the board of review. … Having found substantial evidence in support of the board’s decision, we must affirm. Terry Dairy Products, Inc. v. Cash, 224 Ark. 576 , 275 S.W. 2d 12 (1944); Deatherage v. Charles L.

Caldwell v. BLYTHEVILLE, ARK. SCH. D. 5

746 S.W.2d 381 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1988

A school board's action in this regard is arbitrary and capricious only if the board's decision is not supportable on any rational basis. Leola, supra ; Lee v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Timpani v. Lakeside School District

2011 Ark. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 2, 2011

Russell v. Watson Chapel Sch. Dist., 2009 Ark. 79 , 313 S.W.3d 1 ; Fayetteville Pub. Schs. v. Dial, 2010 Ark. App. 296 , 2010 WL 1379801 . … Dist. #2 v.

King v. State

42 Ark. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1993

Here, as in Smith v. … Brown v. State, 38 Ark. App. 18 , 827 S.W.2d 174 (1992). Under the totality of the circumstances in this case, we cannot say the trial judge erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress. Affirmed.

Christopher Hall v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

685 S.W.3d 925 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 27, 2024

The Board affirmed the Tribunal’s dismissal. Hall appealed the Board’s decision, which we affirm without opinion today in Hall v. Director (E-23-7). … This court’s decision in Carman v.

Wynne Public Schools v. Lockhart ex rel. Lockhart

72 Ark. App. 24 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 29, 2000

Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. at 577, citing Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1968). The courts have been reluctant to interfere with the authority of local school boards to handle local problems. Fortman v. Texarkana Sch. … The courts have been reluctant to interfere with the authority of local school boards to handle local problems. Our position was well stated in Safferstone v.

Shane Perry v. Brandie Perry

594 S.W.3d 126 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 29, 2020

Langston v. Brown, 2016 Ark. App. 535, at 10, 506 S.W.3d 261, 268. … Kelly v. Kelly, 2011 Ark. 259, at 5–6, 381 S.W.3d 817, 822–23.

Tejuana Dillard v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Na Security, Inc.

2026 Ark. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 13, 2026

REVIEW V. … This led to the Tribunal, and ultimately the Board, dismissing the appeal as untimely. The error was that no such appeal was before the Tribunal. See Fulmer v. Dir., 2026 Ark. App. 152.

Gamble v. Ark. Dep't of Hum. Servs.

636 S.W.3d 368 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 20, 2021

On cross-examination, appellant stated that the tiny home is more like a brown wooden shed that has been turned into a one-bedroom home. … She stated that she receives board payments as the children’s foster parent.

Bank of Fayetteville v. Dir.

2016 Ark. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2016

E-15-630 THE BANK OF FAYETTEVILLE NA Opinion Delivered February 10, 2016 APPELLANT V. … Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co., 370 Ark. 477, 261 S.W.3d 454 (2007).

Williams v. Pate

463 S.W.3d 734 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 20, 2015

In Passmore v. Hinchey, 2010 Ark. … App. 327 In Brown v. Fountain Hill School District, 67 Ark. App. 358, 1 S.W.3d 27 (1999), Brown filed suit alleging the tort of outrage, and the trial court granted summary judgment to the school district.

Shelley Diane Cooper and Annette Michelle Edelen, Individually and as Trustees of the Dolores S. Bryant Revocable Living Trust v. Horace E. Bryant and Nancy Elizabeth Edelen, Individually and in Her Capacity as Trustee of the Dolores S. Bryant Revocable Living Trust

2022 Ark. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 23, 2022

Box v. State, 348 Ark. 116, 71 S.W.3d 552 (2002) (quoting Brown v. 5 State, 63 Ark. App. 38, 44, 972 S.W.2d 956 (1998)). … The supreme court’s opinion in Sloan v. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Loan & Scholarship Board, 369 Ark. 442, 255 S.W.3d 834 (2007), is controlling here. Like this case, Sloan involved an untimely notice of appeal.

Victor Bernard Williams, M.D. v. Baptist Health D/B/A/ Baptist Health Medical Center

2019 Ark. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 23, 2019

8, 2012, when the Board accepted Dr. … The Board later determined that Dr.

Wash. Cnty., Arkansas v. Presley

573 S.W.3d 563 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 6, 2019

Although the property was zoned for residential and agricultural uses, the Washington County Planning Board and Zoning Board of Adjustments (the board) may authorize other uses upon a finding of the following: (1) That a … Inge v. Walker , 70 Ark. App. 114 , 15 S.W.3d 348 (2000).

Shreck v. State

499 S.W.3d 677 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 7, 2016

White v. State, 2012 Ark. 221, 408 S.W.3d 720; Brown v. State, 2010 Ark. 420, 378 S.W.3d 66. … See Brown supra.

Vivian Anderson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, and Inspiration Day Treatment, Inc.

2020 Ark. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 23, 2020

Garrett v. Dir., 2014 Ark. 50, at 6. There is an element of intent associated with misconduct. Id. … Similarly, in Rodriguez v. Director, 2013 Ark.

Weavers v. Daniels

1 Ark. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1981

Appellant cites Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971) and Kaylor v. Department of Human Resources, 32 Cal. App. 3d 732 , 108 Cal. … In Harris v. Daniels, 263 Ark. 897 , 567 S.W. 2d 954 (1978), the court stated: In appellate review under Ark. Stat.

Crystal Vann v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 6, 2024

Brown v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 403, 500 S.W.3d 781. She argues, “In the instant case, the probation officer testified of the technical violations from a report he did not create. … Affirmed. 6 GLADWIN and BROWN, JJ., agree. Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.

Lawson v. Brooks

29 Ark. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 13, 1989

Paulino v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 676 , 599 S.W.2d 760 (Ark. App. 1980). … We hold that the Board erred in dismissing the appellant’s appeal, and we remand for a hearing to determine whether the late filing was the result of circumstances beyond the appellant’s control. See Paulino v.