Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
1.51s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1992
The Arkansas Supreme Court discussed the legislative purpose behind the adoption of Act 443 of 1987 in Arkansas Burial Association Board v. McEuen Burial Association, 302 Ark. 133 , 788 S.W.2d 234 (1990). … The Act gives the Burial Association Board the authority to establish actuarial rates and reserve requirements necessary to "insure the financial integrity of all burial associations." A.C.A. § 23-78-108 (a)(7) (Cum.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1989
Eastern Missouri Laborers District, et al. v. St. Louis County, (WL #24761) (Mo.App. 1989); Willman v. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 74 Pa. Comm. 67, 459 A.2d 855 (1983); and Wring v. … Dumas v. Jerry, 257 Ark. 1031 , 521 S.W.2d 539 (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2005
The agreement provides for a Board of Trustees appointed by the Crawford County Judge and approved by the Crawford County Quorum Court. … The Board is empowered to manage the System and is given "exclusive control of the expenditures of all moneys collected to the credit of the library fund. . . ." Agreement at §§ IV and V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 2008
See Young v. Rice , 308 Ark. 593 , 826 S.W.2d 252 (1992). … Stilley v. McBride , 332 Ark. 306 , 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1995
The court so held in Harvey v. … Maddox v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 9, 1999
Brown State Senator 17900 Ridgeway Drive Siloam Springs, AR 72761-8866 Dear Senator Brown: This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question: Are individual tenant files maintained by the Siloam … Constitution (see Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977)) can apply in some instances to prevent disclosure of records that would otherwise be open to public inspection under the Arkansas FOIA. 2 See, e.g. , McCambridge v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 2010
Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings Loan , 281 Ark. 308 , 315 , 664 S.W.2d 858 (1984). … This means that any appeal that might be filed before the ABC board cannot be heard until after July 1, 2010.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 2006
RESPONSE I must respectfully decline to answer your questions, which raise issues that were the subject of litigation in Hot Spring County et al. v. … CV-2003-279-2 and Hot Spring County Solid Waste Authority v. Hot Spring County et al., CA 06-38 (September 27, 2006).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1994
You have asked whether the Board of Election Commissioners should have counted the absentee ballots that were not in the small unmarked white envelope. … See Bingamin v. City of Eureka Springs, 241 Ark. 447 , 408 S.W.2d 607 (1966) and Martin v. Hefley, 259 Ark. 484 , 533 S.W.2d 521 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 2008
Jones v. Mear , 256 Ark. 825 , 828 , 510 S.W.2d 857 (1976). … Smith v. State , 354 Ark. 226 , 235-36 , 118 S.W.3d 542 , 547 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 1988
Jail Co. v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson, 179 N.E. 708 , 709 , 258 N.Y. 303 (1932). … See Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W.2d 753 (1968); Scott v. Smith, 292 Ark. 174 728 S.W.2d 515 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 9, 1999
See, e.g. , Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, 720 A.2d 1032 (Pa. 1999); Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Ctr., 77 Ohio St.3d 284 , 673 N.E.2d 1311 (1997); Hutchinson v. … See also Davis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 1998
See, e.g. , Marullo v. N.T.R. Ltd., 1996 R.I. … The immunity doctrines and provisions discussed in this opinion do not, in my opinion, afford immunity from inquiries made to professional boards.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 2004
the board. … Walker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 2001
I am informed that these facilities are county-owned nonprofit institutions governed by a seven-member board appointed by the county judge. … In George v. Jefferson Hospital Ass'n.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 1989
This source of authority was recently noted by the Arkansas Court of Appeals in the case of Credit v. State, 25 Ark. … See, generally, Berry v. Gordon, 237 Ark. 547 , 376 S.W.2d 279 (1964) (statutes must, as a general matter, be read in harmony) and Brown Root, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 13, 1994
It is my opinion, however, that the arbitration hearing at issue in your question is not a "meeting" of the school board for purposes of the FOIA. … See City of Fayetteville v. Edmark, 304 Ark. 179 , 801 S.W.2d 275 (1990). See also Op. Att'y Gen. Nos. 94-023 , 93-154 , and 83-163.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1995
Moreover, under the Arkansas Supreme Court's unequivocal holdings in Quattlebaum v. Davis, 265 Ark. 588 , 579 S.W.2d 599 (1979) and Green v. … Jeffery v. Trevanthan, 215 Ark. 311 , 220 S.W.2d 412 . Green v. Shell, 239 Ark. 1161 , 1162 , 397 S.W.2d 363 , 364 (1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1993
Specifically, you have enclosed a sample school board grievance policy and question its compliance with this act. … Tazewell County School Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1997
Park v. Kincannon, 214 Ark. 398 , 216 S.W.2d 376 (1949). See also Tuck v. Cotton, 175 Ark. 409 , 299 S.W.2d 613 (1927). … Stucco Plus v. Rose, 327 Ark. 314 , 938 S.W.2d 556 (1997); Files v. Ark. State Highway and Transp. Dept. , 325 Ark. 291 , 925 S.W.2d 404 (1996).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna