Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkag

2,277 results

0.34s

  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 2001

    Brown #151 c/o Bill Sadler, Public Information Officer Arkansas State Police #1 State Police Plaza Drive Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Trooper Brown: I am writing in response to your request for my opinion regarding application … See Yarbrough v. Witty, 336 Ark. 479 , 484 , 987 S.W.2d 257(1999); Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 948 S.W.2d 1 (1998); Citizens To Establish A Reform Party v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1996

    See Pockrus v. Bella Vista Property Owners, 316 Ark. 468 , 872 S.W.2d 417 (1994); Scott County v. Frost, 305 Ark. 358 , 807 S.W.2d 469 (1991). … See, e.g., Summers Chevrolet v. Yell County, 310 Ark. 1 , 832 S.W.2d 486 (1992), reh. denied 1992; Gilmore v. Lawrence County, 246 Ark. 614 , 439 S.W.2d 643 (1969). See also Baldwin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 2008

    Att'y Gen. 1999-349 ; 98-275; 94-283; and 94-446, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman , 201 Ark. 370 , 144 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates , 40 Ark. App. 143 , 844 S.W.2d 374 (1992); Acme Brick Co. v. … See Van Hovenberg v. Holman , supra .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2004

    In the absence of guidance from the Court or the State Board, it is my opinion that the term "school district," as used in A.C.A. § 6-17-2403 (c), must be interpreted to refer to a public school district. … impacted by the decision that will be reached by the Arkansas Supreme Court in consultation with two special masters who were appointed on February 4, 2004, in Lake View School District No. 25 of Phillips County, Arkansas, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2005

    The agreement provides for a Board of Trustees appointed by the Crawford County Judge and approved by the Crawford County Quorum Court. … The Board is empowered to manage the System and is given "exclusive control of the expenditures of all moneys collected to the credit of the library fund. . . ." Agreement at §§ IV and V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 2002

    See also State Board of Education Standards for Accreditation of Public Schools § V(D) (providing that districts must develop and file written student discipline policies in accordance with Department of Education guidelines … However, in Rudd v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1995

    The court so held in Harvey v. … Maddox v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1991

    See, e.g. , Rainwater v. Haynes, supra (holding a school district liable for paying special assessments in connection with school property benefited by the improvement); County Board of Education v. … Board of Education of Lonoke County v. Lonoke County, 181 Ark. 1046 , 1054 , 29 S.W.2d 268 (1930).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2002

    such as the Social Work Licensing Board? … In Arkansas DOH v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 2002

    See generally State v. … Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, 300 Ark. 405 , 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989) (stating that such boards' actions are ministerial only, and that they "[d]o not have the authority to declare a candidate ineligible

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1988

    Section 24-3-402 provides in pertinent part: The [Board] of Trustees of the . . . … Donovan v. Walton, 609 F. Supp. 1221 , 1228 (D.C. Fla. 1985). It is thus clear that the "prudent investor rule" would dictate consideration of, inter alia, the financial objectives of the retirement plan.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 24, 2005

    Art. 7 , § 47 ; A.C.A. §§ 16-19-301 through -306 (Repl. 1999); Reed v. State, 330 Ark. 645 , 650 , 957 S.W.2d 174 (1997); and Op. Att'y Gen. 2005-082 . … A constable must comply with any requirements properly promulgated by Supervisory Board before being granted access. I agree with my predecessor and reiterate his earlier opinions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1989

    Eastern Missouri Laborers District, et al. v. St. Louis County, (WL #24761) (Mo.App. 1989); Willman v. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 74 Pa. Comm. 67, 459 A.2d 855 (1983); and Wring v. … Dumas v. Jerry, 257 Ark. 1031 , 521 S.W.2d 539 (1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1992

    The Arkansas Supreme Court discussed the legislative purpose behind the adoption of Act 443 of 1987 in Arkansas Burial Association Board v. McEuen Burial Association, 302 Ark. 133 , 788 S.W.2d 234 (1990). … The Act gives the Burial Association Board the authority to establish actuarial rates and reserve requirements necessary to "insure the financial integrity of all burial associations." A.C.A. § 23-78-108 (a)(7) (Cum.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2006

    See State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, supra (stating that such commissions' actions are ministerial only). Id. … Charisse v. Eldred, supra, citing Phillips v. Melton, 222 Ark. 162 , 257 S.W.2d 931 (1953); Ptak v. Jameson, 215 Ark. 292 , 220 S.W.2d 592 (1949); Wilson v. Luck, 201 Ark. 594 , 146 S.W.2d 696 (1941); and Wheat v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1990

    Beverly Bassett, Secretary Arkansas Cemetery Board Heritage West Building, Third Floor 202 East Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Ms. … Railway v. Burke, 53 Ark. 430 (1890). Applying this principle to the facts at hand compels the conclusion that the "consent" exception was not intended to be included in the adoption by reference.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 2005

    Serv. v. Delta-Hills Health Sys. Inc., 285 Ark. 397 , 687 S.W.2d 840 (1985). … See also Harris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 2008

    See Young v. Rice , 308 Ark. 593 , 826 S.W.2d 252 (1992). … Stilley v. McBride , 332 Ark. 306 , 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 2010

    Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings Loan , 281 Ark. 308 , 315 , 664 S.W.2d 858 (1984). … This means that any appeal that might be filed before the ABC board cannot be heard until after July 1, 2010.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1988

    Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 719 S.W.2d 428 (1986). It is my opinion, in response to your second question, that the determinative date is the first day of the month on which the retirant receives benefits. … Under the Board's policy, a pension will be payable on the first day of the month.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.