Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
0.93s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 2000
In City of Paris v. … In Pogue v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2006
The latter type of communication was at issue in Harris v. City of Fort Smith, No. 04-485 (Ark.Sup.Ct. … Board meeting subject to the FOIA.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1995
See Cox v. Commissioners of Maynard Fire Imp. Dist. No. 1, 287 Ark. 173 , 697 S.W.2d 104 (1985). … Furthermore, the boards may establish a different fee for commercial property than for residential property. A.C.A. § 14-284-212 (g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1999
See, e.g. , Matthews v. Byrd, 187 Ark. 458 , 60 S.W.2d 909 (1933); Cone v. Garner, 175 Ark. 860 , 3 S.W.2d 1 (1927); Reitzammer v. Desha Road Improvement Dist. No. 2, 139 Ark. 168 , 213 S.W. 773 (1919). … Indeed, in Reitzammer v. Desha Road Imp. Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1994
If not, does the Sebastian County Board of Election Commissioners have the authority to remove this independent candidate's name from the ballot, which seems to be inappropriate in view of State v. … It thus appears that the board of election commissioners must determine the prima facie sufficiency of the petition. See generally Carroll v. Schneider, 211 Ark. 538 , 201 S.W.2d 221 (1947) and Swiderski v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1990
Co. v. Pireno, 458 U.S. 119 , 132 (1982). "Whether the claim will be paid or not is dependent on the terms and conditions of the insurance contract and its enforcement." Alleghany Corp. v. Pomeroy, 700 F. … Additionally, the scope of chiropractic is defined by statute and there would be no authority for the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractors to expand that definition by resolution. See, generally, People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 2002
Arkansas State Board of Education, 303 Ark. 666 , 799 S.W.2d 791 (1990) (moneys spent to further Pulaski County desegregation not unconstitutional diversion); and Fayetteville School District No. 1 v. … Matthews, 75 S.E. 166 (1912), which had previously been cited with approval in Board of Education of Lonoke County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1993
The institution employs dorm parents who are apparently compensated for their service by being given free room and board, many work around the clock. … See generally Richter v. Barrett, 173 F.2d 320 (3rd Cir. 1949).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 29, 2002
The Arkansas Supreme Court addressed a separation of powers challenge brought pursuant to this provision in Walker v. Washington Co., 263 Ark. 317 , 564 S.W.2d 513 (1978). … . §§ 12-12-1008 , -1009, -1010, -1011; Section 3 of the Board's Rules and Regulations; Op. Att'y Gen. No. 91-394 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2009
without an advisory or administrative board." 17-4109(10)(a). . . . … [I]t may be presumed that contracts in this regard are entered into on behalf of the county either through the county judge or an administrative board. Cf. Eaton Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 2006
See also Hampton School District v. Phillips, 251 Ark. 90 , 470 S.W.2d 934 (1971). Op. Att'y Gen. 1998-133 , quoting Op. Att'y Gen. 1991-427 . … See e.g., See e.g., In re MacIntyre, 74 F.3d 186 (9 th Cir. 1996); and BTC Federal Credit Union v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1995
See Caldwell v. Board of Election Commissioners, 236 Ark. 719 , 368 S.W.2d 85 (1963). An appeal of the county court's action was provided to the circuit court. See Garland County Board of Election Commissioners v. … See Hollis Co. v. McCarroll, 200 Ark. 523 , 140 S.W.2d 420 (1940), at n. 4 and Op. Att'y Gen. 91-319 at 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1995
In Loftin v. … Cone v. Garner, 175 Ark. 860 , 3 S.W.2d 1 (1927), involved a bill whose original purpose was to abolish township boards of assessment and to create boards of equalization in populous counties.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1994
Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Bank Bldg. Equipment Corp. of America, 225 Ark. 889 , 896 , 286 S.W.2d 323 (1956). … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 2010
Brown State Representative 1001 Oakwood Drive Wynne, Arkansas 72396-1801 Dear Representative Brown: You have asked my opinion about the types of projects to which cities may appropriate moneys pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-174- … Nos. 2006-056 , 2005-206. 2 E.g., Kyle v. State , 312 Ark. 274 , 849 S.W.2d 935 (1993) 3 Id. 4 See, e.g. , Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Sauer , 358 Ark. 89 , 97 , 186 S.W.3d 229 , 235 (2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 2009
. §§ 25-19-101 — 109 (Repl. 2002 and Supp. 2009): Do emails from a school board member addressed to the school superintendent and copied on at least one other board member fall under the disclosure requirements of FOIA? … School board members and a superintendent, as school officials, are certainly entities covered by the act. Cf. Op.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1987
See Cabbiness v. City of North Little Rock, 228 Ark. 356 , 307 S.W.2d 529 (1957). … See Helton v. Sisters of Mercy of St. Joseph's Hospital, 234 Ark. 76 , 351 S.W.2d 129 (1961).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 2003
See also generally Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v. … See also Nakdimen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 23, 1998
See generally Brimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd., 312 Ark. 401 , 849 S.W.2d 948 (1993). … See also A.C.A. § 17-47-201 (c) (Supp. 1997) (providing that "[a] member of the [State Board of Registration for Professional Soil Classifiers] may be reappointed to succeed himself.")
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2004
Soil, Water Conserv. v. City of Bentonville, 351 Ark. 289 , 92 S.W.3d 47 (2002); Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services, 351 Ark. 13 , 89 S.W.3d 884 (2002). … See McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219 , 766 S.W.2d 909 (1989).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna