Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1992

Rainwater v. Haynes, 244 Ark. 1191 , 428 S.W.2d 254 (1968). … See Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of Education, 303 Ark. 666 , 671 , 799 S.W.2d 791 (1990).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 2009

Hanley v. Arkansas State Claims Comm'n , 333 Ark. 159 , 970 S.W.2d 198 (1998); McKinney v. Robbins , 319 Ark. 596 , 892 S.W.2d 502 (1995). Agape Church, Inc. v. Pulaski County , 307 Ark. 420 , 821 S.W.2d 21 (1991). … The reports are to include, inter alia , the names and addresses of the district's board members and officers, any vacancies on the board, and the time, date, and location of board meetings. Id.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 2004

See Abrego v. United Peoples Fed. Sav. Loan, 281 Ark. 308 , 315 , 664 S.W.2d 858 (1984). … Harrison v. Matthews, 235 Ark. 915 , 362 S.W.2d 704 (1962).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 2000

Bd. v. Bolding, 324 Ark. 238 , 920 S.W.2d 825 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc., 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994); Junction City Sch. Dist. v. Alphin, 313 Ark. 456 , 855 S.W.2d 316 (1993); Brimer v. … Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd., 312 Ark. 401 , 405 , 849 S.W.2d 948 (1993); Pledger v. Boyd, 304 Ark. 91 , 799 S.W.2d 807 (1990); Arkansas Department of Human Services v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1998

You note that some school board members apparently think that annual increases in the salaries of school superintendents are mandated by law while others think such increases are discretionary with the respective school boards … See also Hampton School District v. Phillips, 251 Ark. 90 , 470 S.W.2d 934 (1971). I have found no provision of law which mandates annual salary increases for superintendents.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1994

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Lawrence, 215 Ark. 718 , 223 S.W.2d 823 (1949). … Davis v. Holt, 304 Ark. 619 , 804 S.W.2d 362 (1991) (citing Thomas v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1987

The Act as it applies to members of the Board of Directors of a non-profit corporation, provides that a member of the Board of Directors of a non-profit corporation, that is a corporation which holds a valid federal income … Resort, Inc. v. First American National Bank and Lena Bell Young, Co-Trustees of the Harold A. Young Trust, 3 Ark. App. 290 , 625 S.W.2d 557 (1981).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 1993

See Wells v. State, 285 Ark. 9 , 684 S.W.2d 248 (1985). … See Patrick v. State, 295 Ark. 473 , 750 S.W.2d 391 (1988).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1992

Safferstone v. Tucker, 235 Ark. 70 , 73 , 357 S.W.2d 3 (1962) (citations omitted). … I would suggest, however, in the absence of clear authority for this use of a school district's bus, that the consent of the county board of education be obtained.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1991

The ordinance is entitled: An Ordinance to Require the Conway County Fire Department Board to Reimburse County General for Their Worker's Compensation Premium, Line Item 10 — Worker's Compensation, Attachment V of Ordinance … The title indicates, as noted in your correspondence, that the ordinance rquires the Conway County Fire Department Board to reimburse the county general fund for amounts appropriated under Line Item 10 of Attachment V of

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2003

A directive from the PHA Board to all PHA employees. 5. An undated report, itemizing various complaints relating to the Executive Director's performance and listing the Board's responses thereto. 6. … See Stilley v. McBride, 332 Ark. 306 , 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998); Ops. Att'y Gen. Nos. 2001-123 ; 99-054.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1995

. * * * (d) For the purpose of determining how to prorate benefits, the proration shall be considered just and equitable if: (1) The board of trustees pays the full minimum benefit each month to all eligible beneficiaries … McArthur v. Smallwood, 225 Ark. 328 , 281 S.W.2d 428 (1955).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 1995

The act provides a mechanism for these districts to do away entirely with an existing board of commissioners and to elect a new five member board of commissioners. … Sargent v. Cole, 269 Ark. 121 , 598 S.W.2d 749 (1980). See also Walker v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 508 , 886 S.W.2d 577 (1994).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 2005

The court has also explicitly held that service as a school board member is a "civil office under this state" for the purposes of dual service analyses. See, e.g. Williams v. … Att'y Gen. 99-396 (quoting Martindale v. Honey, 259 Ark. 416 , 533 S.W.2d 198 (1976) (Fogleman and Jones, J.J. dissenting)).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1996

. § 24-8-301 et seq. are governed by a board of trustees. … See Conner v. Burnett, 216 Ark. 559 , 226 S.W.2d 984 (1950); Op. Att'y Gen.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1996

Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn. , 193 Ark. 1023 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937). … Maddox v. State, 220 Ark. 762 , 249 S.W.2d 972 (1952).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 1993

See Scott v. … the contract), and Evans v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2002

The school districts have not yet petitioned the State Board of Education to approve the consolidation. … See Sims v. Hazen School Dist. No. 2, 215 Ark. 536 , 221 S.W.2d 401 (1949); Adams v. DeWitt Special School Dist. No. 1, 214 Ark. 771 , 218 S.W.2d 359 (1949); Ops. Att'y Gen. Nos. 96-008 and 94-338.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 26, 1989

Brummund v. City of Oakland, 111 C.A.2d 114, 244 P.2d 441 (1952). City of Ardmore ex rel. Firemen's Relief and Pension Bd. v. Ozment, 467 P.2d 502 (Okla. 1970); Davis v. Peters, 224 S.W.2d 490 (Civ. App. 1949). … Additionally, it is my opinion that the following language from Kelly v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1999

The board has, in fact, established an inspection program, under which individuals who inspect the fitness of heating/ventilation/air conditioning/refrigeration systems must be licensed by the board. … See City Of New York v. FCC, 486 U.S. 57 (1988); Louisiana Public Service Comm'n v. FCC, 476 U.S. 355 (1986).