Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
1.43s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1988
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922). … Marling v. City of Little Rock, 245 Ark. 876 , 435 S.W.2d 94 (1968); Herring v. Stannus, 169 Ark. 244 , 275 S.W.2d 321 (1925).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 23, 2007
The Board has promulgated standard bylaws in the Board Manual and it is stated that "All burial associations shall have and maintain by-laws embodying" the provisions set out in the Board's standard bylaws. … See Thompson v. White River Burial Association, 178 F.2d 954 (8th Cir. 1950) (Emphasis added).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1990
Historically, the Supreme Court of Arkansas appears to have presumed in its opinions that write-in candidates could be elected to school board positions. In Bennett v. … The court in Clement v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1991
Fagan Electric Co., Inc. v. The Housing Authority of the City of Blytheville, 216 Ark. 932 , 228 S.W.2d 39 (1950). … In either case, and in contrast to local housing authorities, the city council exercises authority over the board or commission, (A.C.A. §§ 14-201-104 and 14-201-206 ), and acts to fill vacancies on the board or commission
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 2001
The phrase "[d]ecisions of the board in respect to the above" does not, however, in my opinion, encompass so-called "conditional uses." … See also Rolling Pines v. City of Little Rock, 73 Ark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1997
Jones v. American Home Life Ins. Co. , 293 Ark. 330 , 738 S.W.2d 387 (1987); Op. Att'y Gen. 96-348 . Municipal corporations are not authorized to pass any law contrary to the general laws of the state. Ark. … Att'y Gen. 96-247 ; Cox v. City of Caddo Valley, 305 Ark. 155 , 806 S.W.2d 6 (1991); A.C.A. § 1-2-203 (Repl. 1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1987
of education are sued because of actions taken by the board, is it the duty of the prosecuting attorney for the county (or his deputy) to defend the board? … As a caveat, your attention is directed to McCuen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 2008
Sanderson v. … See also Yates v. Sturgis , 312 Ark. 397 , 849 S.W.2d 523 (1993) ( citing Sanderson, supra ). Provision 1 thus does no more than acknowledge the application of state law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1997
See Hays v. McDaniel, 130 Ark. 52 , 196 S.W. 934 (1917). … See Mears v. Hall, 263 Ark. 827 , 569 S.W.2d 91 (1978). See also Stayton v. Paschall, 9 F.2d 109 (D.C. Ark. 1925).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 2008
See, e.g., Memphis Trust Co. v. St. … Uniform Linen Supply Co. v. Inst. Serv. Corp. , 287 Ark. 370 , 373 , 700 S.W.2d 358 (1985) (noting the court's statement, in dictum , in Adams v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 2005
Clark, Executive Director Arkansas Fire Police Pension Review Board 620 West Third Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2212 Dear Mr. … See Campbell v. State, 311 Ark. 641 , 846 S.W.2d 639 (1993); Chrisco v. Sun Industries, 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990). See also Hattison v. State, 324 Ark. 317 , 920 S.W.2d 849 (1996) and Baumer v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2002
See Ashcraft v. Cox, 310 Ark. 703 , 839 S.W.2d 219 (1992). It has also been stated that it is the province of courts to see that every legal vote cast is counted where the possibility exists. Cain v. … See Meyers v. Jackson, 390 F.Supp. 37 (E.D. Ark. 1975) (holding the precinct durational residency requirement unconstitutional); see also generally State v. Craighead County Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 2008
See also, Hannah v. Deboer , 311 Ark. 215 , 843 S.W.2d 800 (1992). … See, e.g., Butler v. Board of Directors , 99 Ark. 100 , 137 S.W. 251 (1911) and Curlin v. Harding Drain Improvement District , 221 Ark. 412 , 252 S.W.2d 345 (1952).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 2008
Att'y Gen. 2003-349 at 4, quoting Magnolia School District No. 14 v. … See generally Bunch v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 2005
If such an agreement is entered, the local pension fund would be administered by the LOPFI board, thereby placing the money in the local fund within the administration of the LOPFI board. See Op. Att'y Gen. 96-192 . … See generally Cross v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1990
The case of Williams v. Douglas, 251 Ark. 555 , 473 S.W.2d 896 (1971) offers guidance in this regard wherein the Arkansas Supreme Court construed, and reconciled, Section 7 and Section 10 of Article 5. … It was contended in Williams v. Douglas, supra, that a school board member is excepted from the ban of Article 5, 10 by the provisions of Article 5, 7, supra. 251 Ark. at 556 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1993
Your questions will be restated and answered in the order posed and, per your direction, your references to the Guaranty Fund will be taken to mean the Guaranty Fund Board of Directors. … McArthur v. Smallwood, 225 Ark. 328 , 281 S.W.2d 428 (1955). The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Catherine Templeton.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1994
See generally Stewart v. Hunnicutt, 178 Ark. 829 , 12 S.W.2d 418 (1929) and Rubens v. Hodges, 310 Ark. 451 , 837 S.W.2d 465 (1992). … It must be recognized that according to the Arkansas Supreme Court, a county board of election commissioners is a "ministerial entity" and does not have judicial power. State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 10, 1993
See e.g., McGee v. Armorel Public Schools, 309 Ark. 59 , 827 S.W.2d 137 (1992). But see City of Fort Smith v. Tate, 38 Ark. App. 172 , 832 S.W.2d 262 (1992), aff'd 311 Ark. 405 , 844 S.W.2d 356 . … See Urrey Ceramic Tile Co. v. Mosley, 304 Ark. 711 , 805 S.W.2d 54 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 3, 1991
Because your question references the "Board of Directors" of a "volunteer fire district" (emphasis added), we will assume that it is asked with reference to the board of commissioners of a fire protection district formed … While one might contend that these positions are "incompatible" (see generally Byrd v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna