Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1994

In Terwilliger v. St. … City of Fort Smith v. Brewer, 255 Ark. 813 , 502 S.W.2d 643 (1973).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 2006

Co. v. Arkansas Short Line, 172 Ark. 317 , 288 S.W. 715 (1926); Arlington Hotel Co. v. Rector, 124 Ark. 90 , 186 S.W. 622 (1916). … In Chandler v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 1990

However, A.C.A. 7-5-207 (b) only addresses ballot preparation by the board of election commissioners in general and special elections and then only speaks to eligibility determinations. In a recent case, State v. … The board, being a ministerial entity, simply does not have that power. . . . The board may not exercise discretion or make findings of fact concerning the eligibility of a candidate.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 2006

See also, Jackson v. … Bd. v. Bolding, 324 Ark. 238 , 920 S.W.2d 825 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc., 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994); Junction City Sch. Dist. v. Alphin, 313 Ark. 456 , 855 S.W.2d 316 (1993); Brimer v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1992

With regard to your second question, the Arkansas Supreme Court recently made the statement, in the case of Davis v. … Id. , citing Krone v. Cooper, 43 Ark. 547 (1884).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1994

Since the aforementioned attorney general's opinion was issued, the case of Warren v. … If boards of governors are allowed to purchase real estate, it is likely this provision would be applicable to them as well.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2001

In any event, the two foregoing rules of evidence clearly provide authority for the proposition that in a context in which the Rules of Evidence are applicable ( i.e., court proceedings, see McCambridge v. … give rise to sanctions by the Board.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 2002

See Foster v. Jefferson, 321 Ark. 105 , 901 S.W.2d 809 (1995); Walmsley v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 269 , 885 S.W.2d 10 (1994); see also Williams v. Douglas, 251 Ark. 555 , 473 S.W.2d 896 (1971). … County Planning Board or Municipal Planning Commission?

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1997

President Arkansas State Board of Optometry 119 North Main Street Warren, Arkansas 71671 Dear Dr. … Washington v. State, 319 Ark. 583 , 892 S.W.2d 505 (1995). For a copy of the most recent schedules of controlled substances, contact the Arkansas Department of Health.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 12, 1997

Dept. of Human Serv. v. Wilson, 323 Ark. 151 , 913 S.W.2d 783 (1996); Caplener v. Bluebonnet Mill. Co., 322 Ark. 751 , 911 S.W.2d 586 (1995).) … Because I have opined that the board does not have the authority to employ an environmental enforcement officer, Question No. 4 is moot.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2009

As you can see, a district may be dissolved by a "unanimous vote of the board of commissioners" under two scenarios. 1 A district that has discharged all its debts has the option of dissolving by a vote of its board if title … Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1 , 201 Ark. 512 , 145 S.W.2d 344 (1940). See also Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 2000

Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1986

The "Board" has specific authority to "decide all questions of doubt raised by any provisions" of Act 364 of 1981. See 7.05(c). … Glover v. Henry, 231 Ark. 111 , 328 S.W.2d 382 (1959); Henderson v. Russell, 267 Ark. 140 , 589 S.W.2d 565 (1979). This is especially true where, as here, the body of the Act does not expressly identify its purpose.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1993

Specifically, you have enclosed a letter from a local justice of the peace who poses the following questions in this regard: 1) If a School Board votes to reduce millage by a certain amount, a) may the Board simply request … See generally, Adams v. DeWitt Special School District No. 1, 214 Ark. 771 , 218 S.W.2d 359 (1949) and Sims v. Hazen School District No. 2, 215 Ark. 536 , 221 S.W.2d 401 (1949). But see A.C.A. 26-80-102 (1987).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 2007

See Granger and Wife v. … Muse v. Prescott School Dist. , 233 Ark. 789 , 349 S.W.2d 329 (1961); see also Corbin v. Spec.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 19, 2011

Smith School Dist. v. … See Omega Tube Conduit Corp. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1990

Historically, the Supreme Court of Arkansas appears to have presumed in its opinions that write-in candidates could be elected to school board positions. In Bennett v. … The court in Clement v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1987

Box 926 Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401 RE: School Board Election Petitions Dear Mr. … However, since school elections are nonpartisan in nature, Henley v. Goggins, 250 Ark. 912 , 467 S.W.2d 697 (1971), a more reasonable interpretation of Ark. Stat.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1989

The enforcement powers of the board are less clear. … SEE GENERALLY, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. SUMNER FINANCIAL CORP., C.A., 451 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1971), and 73 C.J.S. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE 50.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 2010

the board. 7 As reflected in the attached Ark. … See, e.g., ACW Inc. v. Weiss , 329 Ark. 302 , 947 S.W.2d 770 (1997).