Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
0.48s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1999
In Brimer v. … In Chandler v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 2008
See also, Nabholz Construction v. … See Stilley v. McBride, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1992
See generally Stroud v. … Klinger v. City of Fayetteville, 293 Ark. 128 , 131 , 732 S.W.2d 859 (1987). The word "materials" does not, in ordinary usage, include services or labor.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 2000
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1992
This latter approach is reflected in the Arkansas Supreme Court's decision in Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Clark, 226 Ark. 548 , 291 S.W.2d 262 (1956). … State Board of Pharmacy v. Troilett, 249 Ark. 1098 , 1102 , 463 S.W.2d 383 (1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1987
Robinson v. … Therefore, it would appear to be a direct conflict of interest for a school director to also serve on the County Board of Election Commissioners.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 2001
board); School District 18 v. … Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 2001
issued in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter and the rules and regulations promulgated by the board. … Southwestern Bell Tel. v. Ar. Pub. Serv. Comm'n., 69 Ark. App. 323 , ___ S.W.3d ___ (2000); Ford v. Keith, a 338 Ark. 487 , 996 S.W.2d 20 (1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1990
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Stroud, 289 Ark. 284 , 711 S.W.2d 785 (1986), citing Thomas v. Easley, 277 Ark. 222 , 640 S.W.2d 797 (1982). … Williams v. Pulaski Co. Elec. Comm'n, 249 Ark. 309 , 459 S.W.2d 52 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2011
Allen v. Ranklin , 269 Ark. 517 , 521 , 602 S.W.2d 673 , 675 (1980) (quoting Goggin v. … See also Lewelling v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1987
Warren v. State, 232 Ark. 823 , 340 S.W.2d 400 (1960). … Kirk v. High, 169 Ark. 152 , 273 S.W. 389 (1925); Lake v. Tatum, 175 Ark. 90 , 1 S.W.2d 554 (1927); Norman v. Blair, 177 Ark. 649 , 7 S.W.2d 328 (1928).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1991
Vandergrift v. Lowery, 195 Ark. 257 , 111 S.W.2d 510 (1937). The county assessor is only authorized to assess real property until July 1st of each tax year and personal property until July 31st. … See Jensen v. Dierks Lumber Coal Co. , 209 Ark. 262 , 190 S.W.2d 5 (1945).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1992
While there may be an argument that the regional districts would not fall within the definitional purview of "state agency" based on Fagan Electric Co. v. … If the board member, who also happens to be a representative of the county or city, is acting solely as an agent for the board in making a board contract, and it is clear that funding for the board's project is done not through
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2006
See generally Flowers v. Norman Oaks Const. Co., 341 Ark. 474 , 17 S.W.3d 472 (2000) and Chism v. … Murphy Oil Corp. v. Hickel, 439 F.2d 417 (8th Cir. 1971). See also Brimer v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 1992
It is my opinion that § 6-61-303 may be cited in support of the State Board's authority to permit the acceptance of a technical college as a branch campus of a four-year institution, assuming that this falls within the Board's … See generally Sargent v. Cole, 269 Ark. 121 , 598 S.W.2d 749 (1980). Of particular significance is the provision under § 6-53-402 for the conversion of an existing two-year branch campus to a technical college.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1988
And as previously noted, the board's responsibilities include carrying out other duties required for the "efficient operation" of the cooperative. … Rainwater v. Haynes, 244 Ark. 1191 , 1195 , 428 S.W.2d 254 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 2003
In Chandler v. … Compare Bond, County Judge v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1997
President Arkansas State Board of Optometry 119 North Main Street Warren, Arkansas 71671 Dear Dr. … Washington v. State, 319 Ark. 583 , 892 S.W.2d 505 (1995). For a copy of the most recent schedules of controlled substances, contact the Arkansas Department of Health.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1994
Since the aforementioned attorney general's opinion was issued, the case of Warren v. … If boards of governors are allowed to purchase real estate, it is likely this provision would be applicable to them as well.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1988
The case of Brewer v. Howell, 227 Ark. 517 , 299 S.W.2d 851 (1957) may be dispositive of the questions posed. … (According to the ruling in Brewer v. Howell, supra, mere employment does not indicate that the school board member is interested "directly or indirectly" within the meaning of 80-505.)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna