Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
1.22s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 2011
Co., Inc. v. Town Creek Const. Dev., LLC , 2011 Ark. 281 , ___ S.W.3d ___ , 2011 WL 2477185 . … E.g., Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway Transp. Dept. , 2009 Ark. 361 , 324 S.W.3d 336 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1989
of election commissioners together with one (1) additional or third member to be appointed by the State Board of Election Commissioners. … Ashley, Drew Northern Ry. v. United Transp., 625 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir. 1980); Ragland v. Allen Transformer Co., 293 Ark. 601 , 740 S.W.2d 133 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2011
Allen v. Ranklin , 269 Ark. 517 , 521 , 602 S.W.2d 673 , 675 (1980) (quoting Goggin v. … See also Lewelling v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1997
See, e.g. , Lavidas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 (1994). … Vanderpool v. Fidelity Cas. Ins. Co. , 327 Ark. 407 , 939 S.W.2d 280 (1997).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2003
See, e.g., Autry v. … Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 2000
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1991
See Pike v. Bruce Church, 397 U.S. 137 (1970), and Opinion No. 90-143 . … Sincerely, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General WB:cyh Enclosure 1 The case of Ohio Academy of Chiropractic Physicians v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1991
Vandergrift v. Lowery, 195 Ark. 257 , 111 S.W.2d 510 (1937). The county assessor is only authorized to assess real property until July 1st of each tax year and personal property until July 31st. … See Jensen v. Dierks Lumber Coal Co. , 209 Ark. 262 , 190 S.W.2d 5 (1945).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 1993
This exception to the disclosure requirements under the FOIA was the subject of recent litigation in the case of Bryant v. Mars, 309 Ark. 480 , 830 S.W.2d 879 (1992). … When the board provides notice under this subsection, the board shall solicit the written or oral recommendations of the victim or his next of kin regarding the granting of a pardon. . . . (3) The board shall retain a copy
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1990
Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians, 285 Ark. 128 , 685 S.W.2d 502 (1985). In construing the act, however, each provision must be read in light of every other provision. Chism v. … Friedman v. Supreme Court of Virginia, 822 F.2d 423 (4th Cir. 1987), aff'd 487 U.S. 59 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 2003
In establishing the acceptable range of variance, the department is directed to use the remedial guideline established in Little Rock School District v. … State Police v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1998
Id. at 46; Baxter County Newspapers v. Medical Staff of Baxter General Hospital, 273 Ark. 511 , 622 S.W.2d 495 (1981). … Arkansas Gazette v. Pickens, 258 Ark. 69 , 522 S.W.2d 350 (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1990
McArthur v. Smallwood, 225 Ark. 328 , 281 S.W.2d 428 (1855). See also, Venhaus v. State ex rel. Lofton, 285 Ark. 23 , 684 S.W.2d 252 (1985). … See also McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 261 Cal.Rptr. 313 (1989); Boles Trucking Inc., v. O'Connor, 138 Ill. App.3d 764 , 456 N.E.2d 362 (1985); and 63 Opins. Md. Att Gen. 305.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 2006
Gardner v. Nashville Housing Auth. , 514 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1975). … Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn. , 193 Ark. 1023 , 1024 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937). Accord Thompson v. Roberts, 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1996
See 65 Am.Jur.2d § 152, citing Grant v. A.B. Leach Co. , 280 U.S. 351 (1929). In the case about which you have inquired, the chancery judge chose to create a limited receivership. … See 65 Am.Jur.2d § 154, citing Smith v. McCullough, 104 U.S. 25 (1881), cited with approval in Chapin v. Stuckey, 286 Ark. 359 , 692 S.W.2d 609 (1985) (case decided on exception to cited rule of law).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1998
See Jones v. Cheney, 253 Ark. 926 , 489 S.W.2d 785 (1973); Pyle v. Webb, 253 Ark. 940 , 489 S.W.2d 796 (1973). … See Jones v. Cheney, 253 Ark. 926 , 489 S.W.2d 785 (1973), citing Anders v. Nicholson, 111 Fla. 849 , 150 So. 639 (1933).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1999
In light of the majority opinion in State Board of Workforce Education v. King, 99-04, what is the legal and constitutional status of the legislative members of the Code Revision Commission? 2. … RESPONSE Question 1 — In light of the majority opinion in State Board of Workforce Education v. King, 99-04, what is the legal and constitutional status of the legislative members of the Code Revision Commission?
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 2006
These questions relate to the following reported factual background: During a public meeting of the Forth Smith Board of Directors (the "Board") in December 2005, the Board approved four separate resolutions which provided … RESPONSE I have received correspondence from counsel that represents the City of Fort Smith and various individual city employees and board members in a case captioned Robert A. Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 2007
See generally Bush v. … Additionally, it seems well-established that due process affords the right to present and cross-examine witnesses at school board hearings held on disciplinary matters. See Casada v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1998
El Dorado Mayor v. El Dorado Broadcasting Co. , 260 Ark. 821 , 824 , 544 S.W.2d 206 (1976); Op. Att'y Gen. No. 96-074 . … Therefore, if, during the gathering that takes place after official adjournment of the board's meeting, the board discusses any matter upon which foreseeable action might be taken, that occurrence will constitute a "meeting
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna