Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
0.93s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2001
See Employer's Liability v. … ["AHDC"] v. Governmental Bonding Board, 319 Ark. 716 , 894 S.W.2d 580 (1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 13, 1996
See Pledger v. C.B. Form Co. , 316 Ark. 22 , 871 S.W.2d 333 (1994); Allen v. Ingalls, 182 Ark. 991 , 33 S.W.2d 1099 (1930). In Allen v. … It did so in the course of discussing the earlier case of State v. Martin Lipe, 134 Ark. 420 , 204 S.W. 622 (1918), in which the rules of a board of health had been challenged.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1997
Dept. v. Hope Brick Works, Inc., 294 Ark. 490 , 744 S.W.2d 711 (1988); Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W.2d 753 (1968). … Commercial Printing Co. v. Rush, 261 Ark. 468 , 549 S.W.2d 790 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 2000
L.L.C. et al. v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority , Case No. LR-C-99-307, held that ADFA is not an "alter ego" of the state that might avoid suit by invoking Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. … However, in my opinion this holding in no way undermines the conclusion that the ADFA board is a state board eligible to participate in the Fidelity Bond Program.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 2003
Regulations of the Arkansas Board of Corrections, Regulation 7.9 (Meritorious Good Time), V(B) (Definitions). … See Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas DHS, 351 Ark. 13 , 89 S.W.3d 884 (2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 2001
While the Planning Board may thus recommend zoning, such recommendations are not binding until adopted by the Quorum Court. Accord Rickman v. Mobbs, 253 Ark. 969 , 490 S.W.2d 129 (1973). … of the Board, as it may do pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-17-203 (f).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 1990
The Board's long-standing interpretation of these statutory provisions must be given consideration and will not be disregarded by a court unless clearly wrong. See, e.g., Morris v. … McArthur v. Smallwood, 225 Ark. 328 , 281 S.W.2d 428 (1955). We cannot conclude, following the above precepts, that the Board's action in this instance in imposing a one year experience requirement is "clearly wrong."
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 2000
See e.g., Vanderpool v. Fidelity Casualty Ins. Co., 327 Ark. 123 , 847 S.W.2d 707 (1997); and Thomas v. Cornell, 316 Ark. 366 , 872 S.W.2d 370 (1994). … See Kifer v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 777 F.2d 1325 (1985); Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. v. Gus Blass Co., 150 F.2d 988 , cert. denied 326 U.S. 773 (1945).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 2005
See generally Cloverleaf Express v. Fouts, No. CA 04-921 (Ark.Ct.App. April 27, 2005). I cannot say that the Board's interpretation of A.C.A. § 24-8-211 is clearly wrong in this instance. … See Omega Tube Conduit Corp. v. Maples, 312 Ark. 489 , 850 S.W.2d 317 (1992), reh'g denied, (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 2004
See also Lewelling v. … See generally Glover v. Henry, 231 Ark. 111 , 328 S.W.2d 382 (1959) (holding that a school district board member is not an "officer" under Ark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 2002
That agreement specifically states, `[t]he number of members of the present Board of Directors of the Trumann District will be increased to six (6) to accommodate one board member from the Central District in accordance with … . § 6-13-630 (school board resolution as adopting zoned school board member elections); and East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1988
If a member of a pension fund board of trustees is also an officer of a financial institution in which the pension fund board is considering investing money, does a conflict of interest exist for that board member and what … See, Home Fire Insurance Co. v. Benton, 106 Ark. 552 , 153 S.W.2d 830 (1913); Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. W. S. Fox Sons, Inc., 251 Ark. 247 , 472 S.W.2d 766 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 2004
Additionally, according to my understanding, the Rule you have alluded to is currently the subject of an action pending in the Pulaski County Circuit Court ( Arkansas Psychology Association v. … Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology (No. 2003-4543)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 2008
The issue will focus on the Board's grant of authority under the Public Facilities Boards Act, as well as the creating ordinance, see A.C.A. § 14-137-107 (Repl. 1998), and the question of whether the particular transactions … See, e.g., City of Blytheville v. Parks , 221 Ark. 734 , 255 S.W.2d 962 (1953); Little Rock Chamber of Commerce v. Pulaski County , 113 Ark. 439 , 168 S.W. 848 (1914); Op. Att'y Gen. 2002-099 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1988
Glover v. Henry, 231 Ark. 111 , 328 S.W.2d 382 (1959). … Additional support for this conclusion is found in Walther v. McDonald, 243 Ark. 912 , 422 S.W.2d 854 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 14, 2005
Nos. 2001-042 ; 2000-072; 99-349; 98-275; 94-283; and 94-446, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman, 201 Ark. 370 , 144 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates, 40 Ark. … App. 143 , 844 S.W.2d 374 (1992); Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 307 Ark. 363 , 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991); and 63A Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees § 321.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 2009
Compare Salley v. … Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 2000
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 4, 1994
See generally Moss v. Allstate Ins. Co., 29 Ark. App. 33 , 776 S.W.2d 831 (1989). … Additionally, the Arkansas Supreme Court has interpreted a school board director's oath of office as prohibiting a director from making private sales to his district. See Dowell v. School Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1989
Bank. v. Abbot [Abbott], 288 Ark. 304 , 705 S.W.2d 3 (1986). … Gonzales v. Manzagol, 87 N.M. 230 , 531 P.2d 1203 (1975). ___________. A response to your other two questions is unnecessary, in light of the foregoing.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna