Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
1.67s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1987
Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 , 13 L.Ed. 996 (1852); H.P. Hood Sons, Inc. v. DuMond, 336 U.S. 525 (1949); Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617 (1978); Hughes v. Oklahoma, 441 U.S. 322 (1979). … See, e.g., McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Min. Co., 309 U.S. 33 (1940); Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622 (1951). The Court stated as follows in Breard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1997
Lucas v. Hancock, 266 Ark. 142 , 583 S.W.2d 491 (1979). … Harrison v. Matthews, 235 Ark. 915 , 362 S.W.2d 704 (1962). Substantive legislation, on the other hand, is that which creates new rights or extinguishes old ones. Gannett River States Publishing Co. v. Arkansas Indus.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 28, 1988
Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1, 201 Ark. 512 , 515 , 145 S.W.2d 344 (1940). The court in Page v. … Page v. Highway 10, 201 Ark. at 518 . 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1993
Bell v. Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge Dist. , 109 Ark. 433 , 160 S.W. 390 (1913). … The "Telephone Consumer Protection Act," codified at 47 U.S.C. § 227 (which in any event has been enjoined by a federal court as violating the First Amendment ( Moser v. F.C.C., 811 F. Supp. 541 (D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 1996
Because I have used the provisions of A.C.A. § 14-47-124 and the decision in Czech v. … The language of A.C.A. § 14-47-124 , which the Czech v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1993
Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge Dist., 188 Ark. 396 , 66 S.W.2d 619 (1934). … A.C.A. § 6-18-206 (b)(3). 3 See also Love v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 2010
Comm'n v. … See, e.g., Donaldson v. State , 370 Ark. 3 , 257 S.W.3d 74 (2007).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2000
. § 17-93-308 (a)(8) continues to state: (a) After due notice and hearing, the board may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license of any person licensed under this chapter, or take other appropriate action against … Donoho v. Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994); Thomas v. State, 315 Ark. 518 , 868 S.W.2d 85 (1994). Routh Wrecker Serv., Inc. v. Wins, 312 Ark. 123 , 847 S.W.2d 707 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1994
United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co., 509 U.S. ___ , ___, 113 S.Ct. 2696 , 2703 , 125 L.Ed.2d 345 , 355 (1993) (citing Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York v. … See Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469 , 480 , 109 S.Ct. 3028 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1990
Snuggs v. Board of Trustees of Arkansas State Emp. Retirement System, 241 Ark. 402 , 407 S.W.2d 933 (1966). … Alexander v. Lee Way Motor Freight, 15 Ark. App. 41 , 689 S.W.2d 3 (Ark.App. 1985); U.S. v. Mashburn, 85 F. Supp. 968 (E.D.Ark. 1949).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 2010
Extradition and Detainers § 5. 2 Smith v. Fox , 358 Ark. 388 , 392 , 193 S.W.3d 238 , 241 (2004). 3 E.g., Brown v. State , 375 Ark. 499 , 502 , 292 S.W.3d 288 , 290 (2009). 4 E.g., Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. … ."); Commonwealth of Penn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1997
See Belvedere Sand Gravel Co. v. … Accord, Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp. , 308 Ark. 124 , 823 S.W.2d 852 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 2002
Powers v. … Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, 300 Ark. 405 , 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989) (stating that such boards' actions are ministerial only, and that they "[d]o not have the authority to declare a candidate ineligible
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 2007
See also Halbert v. … [Citing Chandler v. Board of Trustees, supra.] A determination of the question of who is receiving the primary benefit of the property will turn upon a consideration of all of the relevant facts . . . . Op.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 2007
Others are Public Facilities Boards, Not-For-Profit Corporations, Private Corporations, and Regional Water Distribution Districts. 3. … Waterworks v. Kristen Investment Properties , 72 Ark. App. 37 , 42 , 32 S.W.3d 60 (2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 2003
Brown Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand and Gravel, Inc., 767 F.2d 464 (8 th Cir. 1985). If the legislature intends to relocate this power of appointment in the mayor, I believe it must do so expressly and directly. … Att'y Gen. 99-349 ; 98-275; 94-283; and 94-446, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman, 201 Ark. 370 , 144 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates, 40 Ark. App. 143 , 844 S.W.2d 374 (1992); Acme Brick Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 24, 2004
You indicate that you presented a request under the FOIA to the Fayetteville Public Schools for copies of the "Superintendent's Benefit Package approved June 26, 2003 by the Fayetteville Board of Education." … Stilley v. McBride, 332 Ark. 306 , 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 2005
See Dailey v. … See generally Little Rock Road Machinery Co. v. Jackson County, 233 Ark. 53 , 342 S.W.2d 407 (1961); Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. New, 208 Ark. 874 , 187 S.W.2d 948 (1945); Fort Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 2001
Troy v. Yelle, 36 Wash.2d 192 , 217 P.2d 337 (1950); Schmoldt v. … Tipton v. Erickson, 93 Mont. 466 , 19 P.2d 227 (1933); State ex rel. Toomey v. State Board of Examiners, 74 Mont. 1 , 238 P. 316 (1925); Riley v. Johnson, 219 Cal. 513 , 27 P.2d 760 (1933); State Budget Commission v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 1998
Hice v. State, 268 Ark. 57 , 593 S.W.2d 169 (1980). Each section is read in light of every other section, and the object and purposes of the legislation are to be considered. Chism v. … Locke v. Cook, 245 Ark. 787 , 434 S.W.2d 598 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna