Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
1.70s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1987
See also Thompson v. Clark, 221 Ark. 955 , 257 S.W.2d 42 (1953). The State holds its title to the beds of navigable streams and rivers as trustee for all its citizens. State v. … Hicks v. Arkansas State Medical Board, 537 S.W.2d 794 , 260 Ark. 31 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1993
Elrod, 244 Ark. 671 , 426 S.W.2d 797 (1968); Bailey v. Abington, 201 Ark. 1072 , 148 S.W.2d 176 (1941), and generally, Block v. Allen, 241 Ark. 970 , 411 S.W.2d 21 (1967). … The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Williams v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 2006
See Schuman v. … of Education v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 1999
Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v. … See Bailey v. McCuen, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 2002
Cathyrn Hinshaw Executive Director Arkansas Fire and Police Pension Review Board P.O. Drawer 34164 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Ms. … In Jackson v. Blytheville Civ. Serv.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 23, 2002
Bourne v. Board of Trustees, 347 Ark. 19 , 59 S.W.3d 432 (2001). The ordinary meanings of some of these designated uses could clearly encompass certain items for fire departments or other municipal departments.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 16, 1999
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 2007
See Thompson v. Roberts , 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998). The Arkansas Supreme Court has stated that two offices are "incompatible" if "there is a conflict of interests." Byrd v. … See, e.g., Thompson v. Roberts , 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1993
Sander v. Blytheville, 164 Ark. 434 , 262 S.W. 23 (1924); City of Fort Smith v. Van Zandt, 197 Ark. 91 , 122 S.W.2d 187 (1938). … City of Little Rock v. Smith, 204 Ark. 692 , 696 , 163 S.W.2d 705 (1942), quoting Beaty v. Humphrey, 195 Ark. 1008 , 115 S.W.2d 559 (1938).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 30, 2001
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1999
The Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act states in pertinent part: Every contract of employment made between a teacher and the board of directors of a school district shall be renewed in writing on the same terms and for the … Mitchell v. State, 178 Ark. 659 , 12 S.W.2d 407 (1928). Therefore, the "terms" of a teacher's contract can be increased or decreased by law. Act 773 had this effect.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1999
Magnolia School District No. 14 v. … Arkansas State Board of Education, 303 Ark. 666 , 799 S.W.2d 791 (1990) (payment of court-ordered attorneys fees for desegregation not an unlawful diversion of school funds under art. 14, § 2).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1995
Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 719 S.W.2d 428 (1986). In addition, and with reference to § 14-58-303 (a), a general law does not apply where there is another statute governing the particular subject. Williams v. … See Klinger v. City of Fayetteville, 293 Ark. 128 , 732 S.W.2d 859 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 1992
See, e.g., Russell v. Tate, 52 Ark. 541 (1889). The city must use the property it holds for purposes sanctioned by law. See Gritton v. City of Des Moines, 73 N.W.2d 813 , 247 Iowa 326 (1955) (citing Russell v. … See also generally Sears v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1995
. § 17-31-204 (f) gives cities full authority to supervise plumbing inspections, notwithstanding regulation by the State Board of Health. This particular statute was cited in Lavender v. … Potts v. Hay, 229 Ark. 830 , 318 S.W.2d 826 (1958); Linwood Auburn Levee Dist. v. State, 121 Ark. 489 , (1915).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 2011
See generally Fulkerson v. Refunding Board , 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941). … See, e.g., Crain v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 2011
Sincerely, DUSTIN McDANIEL Attorney General DM:EAW/cyh 1 A.C.A. § 26-79-104 (Repl. 2008) (emphasis added). 2 McLane v. Southern, Inc. v. … Arkansas Tobacco Control Board , 2010 Ark. 498 , 18 , ___ S.W.3d ___ (2010). 3 A.C.A. § 25-20-104 (a) (Supp. 2009). Accord Op.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 1996
Const., art. 2 , § 8 ; Prather v. Martin, 257 Ark. 576 ; 519 S.W.2d 72 (1975); Diercks Forest v. Shell, 240 Ark. 966 , 403 S.W.2d 83 (1966). … countywide or statewide reappraisal of property: (1) Pursuant to court order; or (2) Pursuant to directive of law enacted by the General Assembly; or (3) When the reappraisal is initiated by the assessor, the county equalization board
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2004
City of West Helena v. Sullivan, 353 Ark. 420 , 107 S.W.3d 166 (2003); Williams v. City of Fayetteville, 348 Ark. 768 , 76 S.W.3d 235 (2002); Villines v. Harris, 340 Ark. 319 , 11 S.W.3d 516 (2000); Ghegan v. … One of the leading cases in which the Arkansas Supreme Court addressed the issue of the unlawful use of public resources for a private purpose was Chandler v. Board of Trustees, 236 Ark. 256 , 365 S.W.2d 447 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 25, 1988
In Hostetter v. … Still earlier, the court stated in State Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna