Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
2.58s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1991
You note that this opinion relied on the cases of Easterling v. Cook, 175 Ark. 574 , 299 S.W. 1009 (1927) and Board of Education v. Morgan, 182 Ark. 1110 , 34 S.W.2d 1063 (1931), both of which have now been overruled. … The Court in Mears v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2004
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1998
. §§ 16-17-208 and 14-47-110 as are the rest of the City Board of Directors' races without a primary, or in another manner. … This purpose is also confirmed by the following language from Williamson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 1989
Hinshaw Executive Director Arkansas Local Police Fire Retirement System Arkansas Fire Police Pension Review Board 2020 West 3rd, Suite 300 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Ms. … See generally Burke v. State, 76 Ga. App. 612 , 47 S.E.2d 116 (1948), (holding that the chief of police is a "policeman".)
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1991
The loan is first reviewed by ATRS staff members, then by the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, and then by the Investment Committee, which is composed of five members of the Board of Trustees of the Retirement System … Plante v. Gonzales, 575 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 (1979); McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219 , 766 S.W.2d 909 (1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 2004
" means space occupied by personnel performing their daily work functions; (2) "Smoking" means a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, or any other ignited tobacco product; and (3) "State agency" means any department, agency, board … E.g., Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas DHS, 351 Ark. 13 , 89 S.W.3d 884 (2002). Question 2 — Under A.C.A. § 25-1-102 (b), what rights of nonsmokers are recognized? Again, I am unable to answer this question.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1998
of Adjustment of Fayetteville v. … See generally City of Lowell v. M N Mobile Home Park, 323 Ark. 332 , 916 S.W.2d 95 (1996); City of Little Rock v. Breeding, 273 Ark. 437 , 619 S.W.2d 664 (1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 2008
Weiss v. McFadden , supra . … Att'y Gen. 2001-042 ; 2000-072; 99-349; 98-275; 94-283; and 94-446, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman , 201 Ark. 370 , 144 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates , 40 Ark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 2008
United States, 167 U.S. 518 (1897) and McKelvey v. United States, 260 U.S. 353 (1922). See also, Robbins v. … beyond territorial limits'") and Montero v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1995
Kerr v. East Central Arkansas Regional Housing Authority, 208 Ark. 625 , 187 S.W.2d 189 (1945). … The General Assembly, in establishing the Arkansas School for Mathematics and Sciences, has stated that: "[t]he board [of trustees of the ASMS] is authorized and empowered to receive contributions, donations, gifts, bequests
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1998
See generally Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler, 295 Ark. 223 , 748 S.W.2d 129 (1988). … See Morris v. Torch Club, 278 Ark. 285 , 645 S.W.2d 938 (1983). I cannot conclude that AHTD is clearly wrong in its interpretation of § 27-65-129 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1991
. § 14-92-601 may continue to collect both their current and delinquent assessments or either, as the board elects. 2 The crux of your question is whether Act 281 of 1991 in any way repeals the provisions of A.C.A. § 14-92 … May Co., v. McCastlain, 244 Ark. 495 , 426 S.W.2d 158 (1968). The new act simply provides more effective collection measures for districts whose taxes are collected by the county officials under § 14-92-228 et seq.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1991
Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc. v. Bingham County Board of County Commissioners, 102 Idaho 838 , 642 P.2d 553 (1982). … The only analogous case from another jurisdiction which we have found is Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority v. Conyer, 207 Va. 351 , 150 S.E.2d 87 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1997
Certain members of the association's board have approached the county judge and requested that all easements concerning the association be filed free of charge for the benefit of the county residents and to help ensure that … The above-quoted provision is stated in mandatory language, see Campbell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 1990
See Berger v. Lutterloh, 69 Ark. 576 , 68 S.W. 37 (1901); Martin v. McDiarmid, 55 Ark. 213 , 17 S.W. 877 (1891). The above opinions did not, however, address the situation involving a recessed quorum court meeting. … The Arkansas Supreme Court in Martin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2006
Schuman v. Metropolitan Trust Co., 199 Ark. 283 , 134 S.W.2d 539 (1940). … Hercules Inc. v. Pledger, 319 Ark. 702 , 894 S.W.2d 576 (1995); Boone County Board of Education v. Taylor, 185 Ark. 869 , 50 S.W.2d 241 (1932).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 2002
Cyphers v. United Parcel Service, 68 Ark. App. 62 , 3 S.W.3d 698 (1999); Little Rock Cleaning Sys. Inc. v. Weiss, 326 Ark. 1007 , 935 S.W.2d 268 (1996); Douglass v. … the effective date of the newly adopted benefit program is expressly designated as "the first day of the calendar month specified by the governing body, the first day of the calendar month next following receipt by the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1992
Fayetteville Board of Adjustment v. Osage Oil, 258 Ark. 91 , 522 S.W.2d 836 (1975). This office is not empowered as a fact finder. It is my opinion that the answer to your second question is also "no."
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1997
Coleman v. State, 327 Ark. 381 , 938 S.W.2d 845 (1997 ); Richie v. Board of Educ. , 326 Ark. 587 , 933 S.W.2d 375 (1996). … Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. Priest, 325 Ark. 257 , 926 S.W.2d 432 (1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 2001
Moreover, it is my understanding that the Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board has not promulgated a rule or regulation addressing the placement of advertising, nor has it had occasion to address a situation … See, e.g., Worth v. City Of Rogers, 341 Ark. 12 , 14 S.W.3d 471 (2000). The common usage meaning of the word "about" can be derived from the dictionary definition.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna