Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
0.85s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 7, 1995
NCALA therefore obviously is not an office, department, or board of Van Buren County. … No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc., 313 Ark. 661 , 858 S.W.2d 74 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1989
Cook, Commissioner of Revenues v. Arkansas State Rice Milling Company, 213 Ark. 396 , 400 , 210 S.W.2d 511 (1948). … Buzbee v. Hutton, 186 Ark. 134 , 52 S.W.2d 647 (1932); Board of Trustees of the Municipal Judges and Clerk's Fund v. Beard, 273 Ark. 423 , 620 S.W.2d 295 (1981). All doubt must be resolved in favor of constitutionality.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1995
Are cost of living adjustments passed by the Arkansas Legislature the type of `benefit enhancements' contemplated by Paragraph V(d) of the model QDRO? … Sincerely, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General WB:EAW/cyh 1 The QDRO form was adopted pursuant to A.C.A. § 9-18-103 (Repl. 1993) which states, under subsection (b), that "[t]he boards of trustees of the retirement systems shall
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 2010
Kurrus v. Priest , 342 Ark. 434 , 29 S.W.3d 669 (2000); Donovan v. Priest , 326 Ark. 353 , 931 S.W.2d 119 (1996); and Plugge v. McCuen , 310 Ark. 654 , 841 S.W.2d 139 (1992). … Bailey v. McCuen , 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen , 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen , 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall , supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1989
Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1, 201 Ark. 512 , 515 , 135 S.W.2d 344 (1940). … The matter of accepting such dues could, however, arguably be addressed by the commissioners pursuant to the board's power to establish rules and regulations governing the use of the district's facilities.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2003
advertising and promotion commission in the City of Brinkley, a city of the first class: The corporate authority of cities in Arkansas are [sic] `vested in one (1) principal officer, to be called the mayor, and one (1) board … A.C.A. § 14-43-501 (1987); Gibson v. City of Truman, 311 Ark. 561 , 845 S.W.2d 515 (1993). The mayor is also granted a vote when his vote is needed to pass any ordinance. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 2004
Flowers v. … See generally Chandler v. Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retirement System of the State of Arkansas, 236 Ark. 256 , 365 S.W.2d 497 (1963), and cf. specifically South Carolina Op. Att'y. Gen. issued April 24, 1987.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1990
Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425 , 434 , 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984); see also Harris v. State, 285 Ark. 345 , 686 S.W.2d 440 (1985). … See, e.g., Brown Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand Gravel, Inc., 767 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1985); see also Lovell v. State, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 1991
Co. v. Pritchard, 97 Ark. 100 , (1910). Such penalties, however, may be strictly construed. St. Louis, I.M. S.R. Co. v. McClerkin, 88 Ark. 277 , 114 S.W. 240 (1908). … See also Marvin v. Trout, Ohio, 199 U.S. 212 (1905).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1997
In State Board of Education v. Commission of Finance, 122 Utah 164 , 247 P.2d 435 (1952), a case which relied upon the Arkansas case of State v. … Lucas v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1987
Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians, 285 Ark. 128 , 685 S.W.2d 502 (1985); Hot Springs School District No. 6 v. Wells, 281 Ark. 303 , 663 S.W.2d 733 (1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1987
to state or federal statute, or (3) duly appointed member of a committee of a medical staff of a licensed hospital (provided the medical staff operates pursuant to written bylaws that have been approved by the governing board … A committee that is not formed for the purpose reflected in Hayden v. Brace does not, in my opinion, meet the spirit or intent of 71-5101.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 2007
Section 23-52-107 of the Code (Supp. 2005) mandates that as a condition of conducting business a "check casher" obtain a permit from the State Board of Collection Agencies. … The question you have posed in your request is in many respects similar to one addressed in Heidelberg v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1986
See Baldasaar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222 (1980) (plurality opinion); Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425 , 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984); State v. Brown, 283 Ark. 304 , 675 S.W.2d 822 (1984). Without addressing whether Mr. … See Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980); Reynolds v. State, No. CACR 86-38 (Ark.App. July 9, 1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2011
As noted above, a nonprofit dispensary agent may be, among other things, an officer, board member, or manager. … Section 8(2)(a)(ii)(C) requires dispensaries to state in applications "the name, address and date of birth of each principal officer and board member. . . ." The words "officer" and "board member" imply a corporation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 1997
See Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 1989
Packard Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485 (1946); Consumer's Union of United States, Inc. v. Heimann, 589 F.2d 531 (D.C. Cir. 1978); Louisiana Chemical Ass'n v. Bingham, 496 F. Supp. 1188 (D.C. … Cunningham. 1 See e.g., Central Television Service, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 16, 1989
See, e.g., McFerrin v. Knight, 265 Ark. 658 , 580 S.W.2d 463 (1979); Brown v. Davis, 226 Ark. 843 , 294 S.W.2d 481 (1956). … In Chastain v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 2003
Huckabee, 328 Ark. 202 , 943 S.W.2d 225 (1997) (upholding appropriation to fund a multipurpose civic center to be owned by quasi-public facilities board); Chapman v. … One of the leading cases in which the Arkansas Supreme Court addressed the issue of the unlawful use of public resources for a private purpose was Chandler v. Board of Trustees, 236 Ark. 256 , 365 S.W.2d 447 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 23, 2002
Zych, 702 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. 1985); Aurentz v. Planning Board, 171 N.J. Super. 135 , 408 A.2d 140 (1979); State ex. rel Stewart v. King, 562 S.W.2d 704 (Mo. 1978); Stoltz v. … Board of Commissioners of the City of Fargo, 211 N.W.2d 399 (N.D. 1973).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna