Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersarkag

2,277 results

2.75s

  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 2009

    Laman v. McCord , 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W.2d 753 (1968); e.g. , Op. Att'y Gen. 2003-170 ; Watkins Peltz, supra , at 5-9. … Ragland v. Yeargan , 288 Ark. 81 , 702 S.W.2d 23 (1986); e.g. , Op. Att'y Gen. 90-001 ; Watkins Peltz, supra , at 8-9.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1989

    The following was also stated in Walnut Grove School District No. 6 v. County Board of Education, 204 Ark. 354 , 162 S.W.2d 64 (1942): `. . . … The act gives the State Plant Board authority to license nurseries and persons nurseries, and to adopt rules and regulations regulating them.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 27, 2003

    . • An ordinance was placed on the agenda for the Fort Smith Board of Directors regular meeting held Tuesday, May 20, 2003. … Serv. v. Delta-Hills Health Sys. Inc., 285 Ark. 397 , 687 S.W.2d 840 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1994

    McCoy v. Walker, 317 Ark. 86 , 876 S.W.2d 252 (1994). The basic rule of statutory construction to which all other interpretive guides defer is to give effect to the intent of the legislature. Id. … Gonzales v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2005

    Flowers v. … Invoking City of Paris [ v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 2006

    RESPONSE Because of pending litigation, namely Oklahoma v. … Specifically I am referring to Oklahoma v. Tyson, et al., Case No. 4:05-CV-329-TCK-SAJ filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 1991

    See, e.g. , NLRB v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., 331 U.S. 416 (1947), reh. denied, 331 U.S. 868 (1947), motion denied, 332 U.S. 823 (1947); Weber v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of Village of Wheeling, 149 Ill. … App. 3d 358 , 562 N.E.2d 318 (1990); Hodgson v. McGuire, 427 N.Y.S.2d 820 , 75 A.D. 763 (1980); Spencer v. Board of Education of City of Schenectady, 333 N.Y.S.2d 308 , 69 Misc.2d 1091 (1972); Ferraro v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1999

    In that case, the Hempstead County Equalization Board hired an appraisal firm to prepare a county wide reappraisal. … The court had reached a similar result in Board of Education of Lonoke County v. Lonoke County, 181 Ark. 1046 , 29 S.W.2d 268 (1930). In Rainwater v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 2005

    Att'y Gen. 2004-091 (citing Scott v. Dunaway, 228 Ark. 943 , 311 S.W.2d 305 (1958)); see also Shuffield v. Raney, 226 Ark. 3 , 287 S.W.2d 588 (1956); and Op. Att'y Gen. 2003-053 . … Ansley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1991

    Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 719 S.W.2d 428 (1986). If a statute is clear and unambiguous on its face, legislative intent must be discerned from the language employed therein. Mourot v. … Brown Root, Inc. v. Hemstead County Sand Gravel, Inc., 767 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1985); Williams v. Pulaski Co. Election Comm., 249 Ark. 309 , 459 S.W.2d 52 (1970).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 1999

    We know from the case of Rehab Hospital Services Corp. v. … Sincerely, MARK PRYOR Attorney General MP:EAW/cyh 1 As also previously noted, however, some uncertainty remains in this regard as a result of certain dicta in the case of El Dorado Mayor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1999

    Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 2001

    While it is my opinion that the City Council likely has the authority to abolish the Waterworks Commission ( see generally City of Ward v. … Faucette Mayor v. Gerlach, 132 Ark. 58 , 200 S.W. 279 (1918). Arkansas law recognizes the official acts of de facto officers as valid. See generally Brown v. Anderson, 210 Ark. 970 , 198 S.W.2d 188 (1946).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1991

    Brown v. Bozeman, 138 Cal. App. 133 , 32 P.2d 168 (1934). It seems clear that if faced with this question, an Arkansas court will consider the city's stated reasons for splitting up the contract. … Klinger v. City of Fayetteville, 297 Ark. 385 , 762 S.W.2d 388 (1988); Conway Corp. v. Contruction Eng'rs, Inc. 300 Ark. 225 , 782 S.W.2d 36 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2004

    Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941). This rule stems from Amendment 7 to the Constitution of Arkansas, which gives the people ninety days within which to file referendum petitions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1989

    Phillips County v. Clayton, 29 Ark. 246 (1874). … See, e.g., Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 710 S.W.2d 428 (1986); Brown v. David, 226 Ark. 843 , 294 S.W.2d 428 (1956). We have found no authority for the collection of the fee when the warrant is issued or served.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1987

    Box 38 Lowell, Arkansas 72745 Dear Representative Matthews: You have requested an official opinion concerning the following question: Are commissioner/board members of suburban improvement districts immune from civil liability … Matthews v. Martin, 280 Ark. 345 , 658 S.W.2d 374 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 2001

    With regard to this issue, the Pennington court stated: [W]e conclude that [the board members in question] were de facto members of the Board, and that their actions were therefore valid. … Chronister v. State, 55 Ark. App. 93 , 931 S.W.2d 944 (1996) and Appleby v. Belden Corp., 22 Ark. App. 243 , 738 S.W.2d 807 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2005

    Using Rehab Hospital Services, Corp. v. … See Waterworks v. Kristen Investment Properties, 72 Ark.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 1992

    Hilton v. … Moss v. Allstate Ins. Co., 29 Ark. App. 33 , 726 S.W.2d 831 (1989). See also Scottish Union Union National Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 183 Ark 860 , 39 S.W.2d 303 (1931); and Associated Seed Growers, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.