Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
3.70s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1996
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 104 (1976); see Lair v. Oglesby, 14 F.3d 15 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying standard), and Union County v. … Warner Brown Hosp., 297 Ark. 460 , 762 S.W.2d 798 (1989) (regarding duty of governmental units under U.S. Const. amend. 14 to provide medical treatment to detainees prior to trial).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 22, 2001
Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 1, 2003
Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1996
See Allen v. Malvern Country Club, 295 Ark. 65 , 746 S.W.2d 546 (1988) (emphasis original), citing Chamber of Commerce v. Barton, 195 Ark. 274 , 112 S.W.2d 619 (1937). … Another marginally relevant provision is found in the minutes of the very first meeting of the Board of Directors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1994
See Betterton, et al. v. Mississippi County Board of Election Commissioners, et al., Mississippi County Circuit Court No. C-94-186.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1997
. § 9-28-205 (Supp. 1995) (pertaining to youth services centers), construed in light of the case of Allred v. Arkansas Dep't of Correction Sch. … The Board of Correction and Community Punishment acts as "the school board for the school district." § 12-29-301 (c).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1999
Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1995
It is my understanding that the board of election commissioners in that instance did not count the ballots in question. … See Washington, et al. v. Lincoln County Election Commission, et al., No. CIV-94-108-3 (Dec. 30, 1994). It is my understanding that no appeal was filed in that case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 2007
App. 77 , ___ S.W.3d ___ (2005); Wenderoth v. City of Fort Smith, 256 Ark. 735 , 510 S.W.2d 296 (1974); Ark. State Hwy. Comm. v. … See generally Freeze, Mayor v. Jones Harvel, 260 Ark. 193 , 199-200 , 539 S.W.2d 425 (1976), citing Lincoln Hotel Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2005
Flowers v. … Invoking City of Paris [ v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 1994
Madden v. United States Associates, 40 Ark. App. 143 , 149 , 844 S.W. 2d 374 (1992), citing Acme Brick Co. v. … Co., Inc., v. The Board of Adjustment of Pottawattamie County, Iowa, 499 N.W.2d 12 , 14 (1993), citing Netluch, 130 N.J. Super. at 108 , 325 A.2d at 519 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 27, 2003
. • An ordinance was placed on the agenda for the Fort Smith Board of Directors regular meeting held Tuesday, May 20, 2003. … Serv. v. Delta-Hills Health Sys. Inc., 285 Ark. 397 , 687 S.W.2d 840 (1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 2006
RESPONSE Because of pending litigation, namely Oklahoma v. … Specifically I am referring to Oklahoma v. Tyson, et al., Case No. 4:05-CV-329-TCK-SAJ filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1992
Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of Education, 303 Ark. 666 , 799 S.W.2d 791 (1990). … Ass'n. v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy, 297 Ark. 454 , 763 S.W.2d 73 (1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2001
See Felton v. Schaeffer, 229 Cal.App.3d 229 , 279 Cal.Rptr. 713 (1991); Keene v. Wiggins, 69 Cal.App.3d 308 , 138 Cal.Rptr. 3 (1977). … Green v. Walker, 910 F.2d 291 , 296 (5th Cir. 1990) (interpreting Louisiana law); see also Daly v. U.S., 946 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir. 1991) (interpreting Washington law); Betesh v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2005
NAME OF OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION BASE DELINQUENCY Brown, Bill pt. … Sluder v. Steak Ale of Little Rock, Inc., ___ Ark. ___, S.W.3d ___ (March 31, 2005) (quotation omitted); see also Op. Att'y Gen. 2004-339 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1986
Watson Bell, Chairman White County Board of Election Commissioners County Clerk's Office White County Courthouse Searcy, AR 72143 Dear Mr. … In answer to your first question, I am enclosing a copy of the decision of Smith v. Ark. 385 F. Supp. 703 (1974). In answer to your second question I am enclosing a copy of Ark. Stat. Ann. 3-613 and 3-614.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1992
If a person is convicted of a controlled substance crime, and pays a fine, but does no time, is that person eligible for expungement by the court (as opposed to the Director of Alternative Services, the parole board or the … Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 719 S.W.2d 428 (1986). Legislative action will, therefore, in my opinion, be necessary in order to make the person in your scenario eligible for expungement. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1987
Lindsey v. Natural Carbonic Gas Company, 220 U.S. 61 (1911), as well as Arkansas Supreme Court cases. See, Dupree v. Alma School District, 279 Ark. 340 , 651 S.W.2d 90 (1983); U-Drive-Em v. … See, Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). Since Act 599 is an action of the state legislature, the anti-trust laws are not applicable to it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1995
Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna