Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 1, 2006

Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 1999

You have posed three questions in this regard, as follows: 1) Is Act 1059 of 1999 preempted by Regulation M of the Federal Reserve Board? … See Arkansas Automobile Dealers Association, Inc. v. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., Case No. 99-7044, Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Second Division.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1991

Owen v. Dalton, 296 Ark. 351 , 354 , 757 S.W.2d 921 (1988), citing Board of Trustees for Little Rock Police Pension Fund v. City of Little Rock, 295 Ark. 585 , 750 S.W.2d 950 (1988). … Board of Trustees of Municipal Judges and Clerks Fund, City of Little Rock v. Beard, 273 Ark. 423 , 620 S.W.2d 295 (1981).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1989

Hudson: This is in response to your request for an opinion on several questions which have arisen due to the Lafayette County Memorial Hospital Board's decision to close the hospital. … See generally Johnson v. Dermott , 189 Ark. 830 , 75 S.W.2d 243 (1934).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 2005

It has come to my attention that the issues you have raised are currently the subject of litigation in the case City of Russellville Police Pension Retirement Board v. Gibson, et al.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 2001

Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489 (1982); Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. State of Minnesota, 910 F.2d 479 (8th Cir. 1990); Cambiano v. … Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997); Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 , 631 (1996); Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 (1982); Craft v. City of Fort Smith, 335 Ark. 417 , 984 S.W.2d 22 (1998).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 2003

Nos. 2000-072 (opining that a school board member who was also a member of the plaintiff class in an action against the school district was not legally precluded from participating in board actions relating to the litigation … See City of Little Rock v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 2005

It has come to my attention that the issues you have raised are currently the subject of litigation in the case City of Russellville Police Pension Retirement Board v. Gibson, et al.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 30, 2003

See Yarbrough v. Witty, 336 Ark. 479 , 484 , 987 S.W.2d 257(1999); Lawhon Farm Services v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 948 S.W.2d 1 (1998); Citizens To Establish A Reform Party v. … Priest, 325 Ark. 257 , 926 S.W.2d 432 (1996); Henson v. Fleet Mortgage Co., 319 Ark. 491 , 892 S.W.2d 250 (1995); Neely v. State, 317 Ark. 312 , 877 S.W.2d 589 (1994); Death and Total Permanent Disability Trust Fund v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 16, 1987

Therefore, the question is, does the "not more than 10% of the portfolio" preclude us from investing more than 10% if the Board so chooses? 3. … You have asked whether this language precludes the System from investing more than 10% if the Board so chooses.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 14, 1991

State v. Brown, 283 Ark. 304 , 675 S.W.2d 822 (1984)). When read as a whole, it can be seen that subsection (b)(1) of the statute refers to buildings with no parking provided for the public.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1995

Holbert Chairman of the Board Aerospace Education Center 3301 East Roosevelt Road Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. … See, e.g., Depoyster v. Cole, 298 Ark. 203 , 766 S.W.2d 606 (1989); Rehab Hospital Services Corp. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1993

The court in Lewis v. … Id. at 721, citing Kirkwood v. Carter, County Judge, 252 Ark. 1124 , 482 S.W.2d 608 (1972).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1992

. § 6-18-202 (d)(1) or § 6-18-205 (b)(1)(A). 1 In response to your third question, it appears that the decision in Stephens v. Humphrey, 145 Ark. 172 , 224 S.W. 442 (1920), renders the answer to this question "no." … The court held that the second district had no right to refuse admittance, stating: ". . . neither the teacher, nor the board of the latter district, nor both combined, had authority to prescribe as a condition precedent

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 1989

BOARD OF EDUCATION, 31 Ohio Misc. 49 , 277 N.W.2d 92 (1971)), census information (Id.), the address from which tax returns are made, (BOARD OF EDUCATION v. … Supreme Court in VLANDIS v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 2006

The Travelers Insurance Company v. … See City of Caddo Valley v. George, 340 Ark. 203 , 9 S.W.3d 481 (2000).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2001

In the recent case of Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. … See Yarbrough v. Witty, 336 Ark. 479 , 484 , 987 S.W.2d 257(1999); Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 948 S.W.2d 1 (1998); Citizens To Establish A Reform Party v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1990

respective cities. (2) The rules and regulations shall have the same force and effect of law. (3) The board shall keep a record of its examinations and shall investigate the enforcement and effect of this chapter and the … It appears that the two most closely relevant decisions of our Arkansas Supreme Court are found in Civil Service Commission of North Little Rock, v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 1, 2003

Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1996

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 104 (1976); see Lair v. Oglesby, 14 F.3d 15 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying standard), and Union County v. … Warner Brown Hosp., 297 Ark. 460 , 762 S.W.2d 798 (1989) (regarding duty of governmental units under U.S. Const. amend. 14 to provide medical treatment to detainees prior to trial).