Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 6, 1995

Att'y Gen. 91-225 , copy enclosed (opining that the FOIA applied when two city board members met to discuss a matter that would foreseeably be acted upon by the board). … The opinion noted the court's statement in Arkansas Gazette Co. v. Pickens, 258 Ark. 69 , 73 , 522 S.W.2d 350 (1975), that the decision therein was "not in any manner predicated upon the number of board members. . . ."

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2000

Federal Express Corp. v. Skelton, 265 Ark. 187 , 578 S.W.2d 1 (1979). … The issue in Board of Regents of Higher Education v. Judge, 168 Mont. 433 , 543 P.2d 1323 (1975), was whether this appropriation bill infringed on the authority of the board, a constitutional body.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990

Holman, 275 S.W.2d 280 (Mo. 1955); Board of Commissioner's of Decatur County v. Greensberg Times, 215 Ind. 4781 , 19 N.E.2d 459 (1939); State v. … Board of County Commissioners, 106 Mont. 251 , 76 P.2d 648 (1938); Robinson v. State, 143 S.W.2d 629 (Tex. 1940).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2003

See, e.g., A.C.A. § 20-17-1006 (setting forth powers and duties of the Cemetery Board). … See A.C.A. § 20-17-1003 (a) (3) and Assembly of God Church v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1991

See Special School District No. 60 v. … Love v. Hill, 297 Ark. 96 , 759 S.W.2d 550 (1988).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 2003

Courtney, D.C., President Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners 101 East Capitol, Suite 209 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. … Supreme Court ruling in Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller, 00-1471, which was decided on April 2, 2003?

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1991

For examples of various lawsuits that might be brought, see City of Fort Smith v. Driggers, 305 Ark. 409 , S.W.2d (May 6, 1991); Worth v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 297 Ark. 251 , 761 S.W.2d 169 (1988); Bennett v. … Comm'n, 293 Ark. 136 , 733 S.W.2d 414 (1987); Connor v. Ricks, 213 Ark. 768 , 212 S.W.2d 552 (1948); and Civil Serv. Comm'n of Van Buren v. Matlock, 205 Ark. 286 , 168 S.W.2d 424 (1943).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 2000

Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 2004

Subsection 26-77-102 (a) provides: Any city council, board of commissioners, or board of aldermen of any municipal corporation in this state shall have the power to enact, by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of all members elected … In City of Mountain Home v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2001

The Honorable Mark Riable, Chair Board of Trustees Arkansas Schools for the Blind and the Deaf P.O. … RESPONSE It is my understanding that your questions are at issue in the recently filed case of John Doe et al. v. Carl Barger et al., U.S. District Court Case No. 4-01-CV-00196 (E.D. Ark. 2001).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 2000

Id. at 10, quoting Board of Education of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 , 250 (1990). … Again, the issue will turn upon all the relevant facts and circumstances. 2 See also, more recently, Alder, Emily, et al. v. Duval City School Board et al., (U.S.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1989

The only exception to the doctrine was noted by the court in CASH, by quoting the following language from CHAPMAN DEWEY LAND CO. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ST. … No such power existed in the board in the case at bar.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998

(4) Is the holding in Cross v. … See, e.g. , Cross v. Bruce, 284 Ark. 230 , 681 S.W.2d 339 (1984); Orrell Abernathy v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 2006

Board of University and School Lands, 21 N.D. 212 , 129 N.W. 1029 .) See also People v. Riggs, 87 P.3d 109 (Colo. 2004); Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. Janklow, 308 N.W.2d 559 , 561 (S.D. 1981) (citing Gustafson v. … See Black v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 2002

Cathyrn Hinshaw, Executive Director Arkansas Fire and Police Pension Review Board P.O. Drawer 34164 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Ms. … Boothe v. Boothe, 341 Ark. 381 , 17 S.W.3d 464 (2000). In my opinion, it is possible to read A.C.A. § 24-11-827 and A.C.A. § 24-11-818 (f) so that both can be given effect.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 2002

Jackson v. Blytheville Civ. Serv. Com., 345 Ark. 56 , 43 S.W.3d 748 (2001); Looper v. Gordon, 201 Ark. 841 , 147 S.W.2d 24 (1941). … Looper v. Gordon, 201 Ark. at 847 .

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1990

Chaffin v. Arkansas Game and Fish Comm'n, 296 Ark. 431 , 437 , 757 S.W.2d 950 (1988) (quoting from Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … Judge, 168 Mont. 433 , 543 P.2d 1323 (1975) (on whether line item restrictions in a university system appropriation bill infringe on the authority of the university board)).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 7, 2007

Fulkerson v. Refunding Board, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 2002

In analyzing the issue, the court stated: In State, Ex Rel, Attorney General v. State Board of Education, 195 Ark. 222 , 112 S.W.2d 18 , this Court said: "In Davis v. … The school boards operate the schools in their respective districts, purchase the required property, hold title to the property for the district, and have complete charge of maintenance. Muse v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2002

Box 1038 North Little Rock, AR 72115-1038 Dear Senator Hoofman: I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on several questions raised by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of Maumelle Suburban Improvement … Moreover, as the Arkansas Supreme Court noted in Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v.